Retrieval of Günther Tulip optional vena cava filters 30 days after implantation: A prospective clinical study

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 11 I, 2006, Pages 1781-1789

  De Gregorio, Miguel Angel ^a   Gamboa, Pablo ^b   Bonilla, Diana L ^a   Sanchez, Maitane ^a   Higuera, Maria T ^a   Medrano, Jokin ^a   Mainar, Antonio ^a   Lostalé, Fernando ^a   Laborda, Alicia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^b RIVERSIDE METHODIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAUSE OF DEATH; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEVICE; DEVICE REMOVAL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DYNAMOMETRY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FILTRATION; FOLLOW UP; FORCE; HEART FAILURE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; SAFETY; THROMBOSIS; VENA CAVA FILTER; IMPLANTATION; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; SAFETY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VENA CAVA FILTERS;

EID: 33751294819     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000244837.46324.72     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Kinney TB. Update on inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:425-440.
2. White RH, Zhou H, Kim J, et al. A population-based study of the effectiveness of inferior vena cava filter use among patients with venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:2033-2041.
3. Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F, et al. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:409-415.
4. Millward SF, Bormanis J, Burbridge BE, et al. Preliminary clinical experience with the Gunther temporary inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1994; 5:863-868.
5. Millward SF, Oliva VL, Bell SD, et al. Günther Tulip retrievable vena cava filter: results from the Registry of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12:1053-1058.
6. Asch M. Initial experience in humans with a new retrievable inferior vena cava filter. Radiology 2002; 225:835-844.
7. Oliva VL, Szatmari F, Giroux MF, et al. The JONAS study: evaluation of the retrievability of the Cordis OptEase inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16:1439-1445.
8. Rosenthal D, Wellons ED, Lai KM, et al. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters: early clinical experience. J Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 46:163-169.
9. Millward SF. Vena cava filters: continuing the search for an ideal device. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16:1423-1425.
10. Recovery Cone Removal System for use with the Recovery Filter [instructions for use]. Tempe, AZ: Bard Peripheral Vascular, 2005. Available at: http://www.bardpv.com/pdfs/IFURecovery-Cone.pdf.
11. Terhaar OA, Lyon S, Given M, et al. Extended interval for retrieval of Günther Tulip filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15:1257-1262.
12. Binkert CA, Bansal A, Gates JD. Inferior vena cava filter removal after 317-day implantation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16:395-398.
13. Millward SF, Grassi CJ, Kinney TB, et al. Reporting standards for inferior vena caval filter placement and patient follow-up: supplement for temporary and retrievable/optional filters J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16: 441-443.
14. de Gregorio MA, Gimeno MJ, Lostale F, et al. Retrievability of uncoated versus paclitaxel-coated Günther-Tulip IVC filters in an animal model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15:719-726.
15. de Gregorio MA. Inferior vena cava filter update. Arch Bronconeumol 2004; 40:193-195.
16. Girard P, Stern JP, Parent F. Medical literature and vena cava filters: so far so weak. Chest 2002; 122:963-967.
17. Haire WD. Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:409-415.
18. Chuu W, Wang NY, Perry D. Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:46.
19. Athanasoulis CA, Kaufman JA, Halpern EF, et al. Inferior vena caval filters: review of a 26-year single-center clinical experience. Radiology 2000; 216:54-66.
20. Stein PD, Kayali F, Olson RE. Twenty-one-year trends in the use of inferior vena cava filters. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164:1541-1545.
21. Decousus H. Eight-year follow-up of a randomized trial investigating vena caval filters in the prevention of PE in patients presenting a proximal DVT: the PREPIC trial. J Thromb Haemost 2003; 1(suppl 1):OC440.
22. Neuerburg J, Gunther RW, Vorwerk D, et al. Results of a multicenter study of the retrievable Tulip vena cava filter: early clinical experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1997; 20:10-16.
23. Rosenthal D, Wellons ED, Levitt AB, et al. Role of prophylactic temporary inferior vena cava filters placed at the ICU bedside under intravascular ultrasound guidance in patients with multiple trauma. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40:958-964.
24. Hoff WS, Hoey BA, Wainwright GA, et al. Early experience with retrievable inferior vena cava filters in high-risk trauma patients. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199:869-874.
25. Leon L, Rodriguez H, Tawk RG, et al. The prophylactic use of inferior vena cava filters in patients undergoing high-risk spinal surgery. Ann Vasc Surg 2005; 19:442-447.
26. Zerati AE, Wolosker N, Yazbek G, et al. Vena cava filters in cancer patients: experience with 50 patients. Clinics 2005; 60:361-366.
27. Offner PJ, Hawkes A, Madayag R, et al. The role of temporary inferior vena cava filters in critically ill surgical patients. Arch Surg 2003; 138:591-594.
28. Wallace MJ, Jean JL, Gupta S, et al. Use of inferior vena caval filters and survival in patients with malignancy. Cancer 2004; 101:1902-1907.
29. Yamagami T, Kato T, Iida S, et al. Günther Tulip inferior vena cava filter placement during treatment for deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2005; 28:442-453.
30. Rutherford RB. Prophylactic indications for vena cava filters: critical appraisal. Semin Vasc Surg 2005; 18:158-165.
31. Rosenthal D, Swischuk JL, Cohen SA, et al. OptEase retrievable inferior vena cava filter: initial multicenter experience. Vascular 2005; 13:286-289.
32. Neuerbeurg JM, Handt S, Beckert K, et al. Percutaneous retrieval of the Tulip vena cava filter: feasibility, short- and long-term changes - an experimental study in dogs. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2001; 24:418-423.
33. de Gregorio MA, Gimeno MJ, Tobio R, et al. Animal experience in the Günther Tulip retrievable inferior vena cava filter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2001; 24:413-417.
34. Brountzos EN, Kaufman JA, Venbrux AC, et al. A new optional vena cava filter: retrieval at 12 weeks in an animal model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:763-772.
35. De Gregorio MA, Gamboa P, Gimeno MJ, et al. The Günther tulip filter: prolonged temporary filtration by repositioning within the inferior vena cava. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:1259-1265.
36. Millward SF, Bhargava A, Aquino J, et al. Günther Tulip filter: preliminary clinical experience with retrieval. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11:75-82.
37. Lopera J, Araki J, Kirsch D, et al. Modified technique to minimize filter tilting during deployment of the Günther Tulip filter: in vitro study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16:1539-1544.