Günther tulip filter retrievability multicenter study including CT follow-up: Final report

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1017-1023

  Hoppe, Hanno ^a   Nutting, Charles W ^b   Smouse, H Robert ^c   Vesely, Thomas M ^d   Pohl, Christoph ^e   Bettmann, Michael A ^f   Kaufman, John A ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BANNER GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c OSF SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e GEISINGER HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^f WAKE FOREST BAPTIST HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FILTER; FOLLOW UP; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INFERIOR CAVA VEIN OBSTRUCTION; JUGULAR VEIN; LUNG EMBOLISM; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THROMBOEMBOLISM; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33748199059     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.90000223689.49091.76     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Streiff MB. Vena caval filters: a comprehensive review. Blood 2000; 95:3669-3677.
2. Mobin-Uddin K, Smith PE, Martinez LO, et al. A vena caval filter for the prevention of pulmonary embolus. Surg Forum 1967; 18:209-211.
3. Ferris EJ, McCowan TC, Carver DK, et al. Percutaneous inferior vena caval filters: follow-up of seven designs in 320 patients. Radiology 1993; 188:851-856.
4. Athanasoulis CA, Kaufmann JA, Halpern EF, et al. Inferior vena cava filters: review of a 6-year single-center clinical experience. Radiology 2000; 216:54-66.
5. Brountzos EN, Kaufmann JA, Venbrux AC, et al. A new optional vena cava filter: retrieval at 12 weeks in an animal model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:763-772.
6. Kaufman JA. Filter placement in deep venous thrombosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166:457-458.
7. Lorch H, Welger D, Wagner V, et al. Current practice of temporary vena cava filter insertion: a multicenter registry. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11:83-88.
8. Millward SF, Bhargava A, Aquino J, et al. Gunther Tulip filter: preliminary clinical experience with retrieval. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11:75-82.
9. Neuerburg JM, Gunther RW, Vorwerk D, et al. Results of a multicenter study of the retrievable tulip vena cava filter: early clinical experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1997; 20:10-16.
10. Oliva VL, Szatmari F, Giroux MF, et al. The Jonas study: evaluation of the retrievability of the Cordis OptEase inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16:1439-1445.
11. Millward SF, Oliva VL, Bell SD, et al. Günther Tulip retrievable vena cava filter: results from the registry of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12:1053-1058.
12. Millward SF. Günther Tulip retrievable filter: why, when, how? Can Assoc Radiol J 2001; 52:188-192.
13. Greenfield LJ, Rutherford RB. Recommended reporting standards for vena caval filter placement and patient follow-up. Vena Caval Filter Consensus Conference. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10:1013-1019.
14. Wicky S, Doenz F, Meuwly JY, et al. Clinical experience with retrievable Günther Tulip vena cava filters. J Endovasc Ther 2003; 10:994-1000.
15. Asch MR. Initial experience in humans with a new retrievable inferior vena cava filter. Radiology 2002; 225:835-844.
16. De Gregorio MAP, Gimeno MJ, Madariaga B, et al. The Gunther Tulip retrievable filter: prolonged temporary filtration by repositioning within the inferior vena cava. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:1259-1265.
17. Lopera JE, Araki JU, Kirsch D, et al. A modified technique to minimize filter tilting during deployment of the Gunther Tulip filter: in vitro study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16:1539-1544.
18. Neuerburg JM, Handt S, Beckert K, et al. Percutaneous retrieval of the Tulip vena cava filter: feasibility, short- and long-term changes? an experimental study in dogs. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2001; 24:418-423.
19. Dibie A, Musset D, Heissler M, et al. In vivo evaluation of a retrievable vena cava filter? the Dibie-Musset filter: experimental results. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1998; 21:151-157.
20. De Gregorio MA, Gimeno MJ, Tobio R, et al. Animal experience in the Günther Tulip retrievable inferior vena cava filter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2001; 24:413-417.
21. Grassi CM, Swan TL, Cardella JF, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous permanent inferior vena cava filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14(suppl):S271-S275.
22. Linsenmaier U, Rieger J, Schenk F, et al. Indications, management, and complications of temporary inferior vena cava filters. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1998; 21:464-469.
23. Matchett WJ, Jones MP, McFarland DR, et al. Suprarenal vena caval filter placement: follow-up of four filter types in 22 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998; 9:588-593.
24. Kachura JR. Inferior vena cava filter removal after 475-day implantation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16:1156-1158.
25. Terhaar OA, Lyon SM, Given MF, et al. Extended interval for retrieval of Gunther Tulip filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15:1257-1262.