Improved residue function and reduced flow dependence in MR perfusion using least-absolute-deviation regularization

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 418-428

  Wong, Kelvin K ^a   Tam, Chi Pan ^a,b   Ng, Michael ^b   Wong, Stephen T C ^a   Young, Geoffrey S ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b HONG KONG BAPTIST UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Bolus delay; LAD; Least absolute deviation; Mr perfusion; Quantitative perfusion analysis

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; HEMODYNAMICS; SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION;

BOLUS DELAY; CEREBRAL BLOOD VOLUME; DECONVOLUTION TECHNIQUES; LEAST ABSOLUTE DEVIATIONS; LEAST ABSOLUTE DEVIATIONS (LAD); MR PERFUSION; PERFUSION ANALYSIS; PERFUSION-WEIGHTED IMAGING;

SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

GADOLINIUM;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

EID: 60549114731     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21860     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Meier P, Zierler KL. On the theory of the indicator-dilution method for measurement of blood flow and volume. J Appl Physiol 1954;6:731-744.
2. Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. I. Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:715-725.
3. Ostergaard L. Cerebral perfusion imaging by bolus tracking. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:3-9.
4. Knutsson L, Larsson EM, Thilmann O, Stahlberg F, Wirestam R. Calculation of cerebral perfusion parameters using regional arterial input functions identified by factor analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;23:444-453.
5. Alsop D, Wedmid A, Schlaug G. Defining a local input function for perfusion quantification with bolus contrast MRI. In: Proceeding of the 10th Annual Meeting of ISMRM. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2002. (abstract 659).
6. Calamante F, Morup M, Hansen LK. Defining a local arterial input function for perfusion MRI using independent component analysis. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:789-797.
7. Lorenz C, Benner T, Chen PJ, Lopez CJ, Ay H, Zhu MW, Menezes NM, Aronen H, Karonen J, Liu Y, Nuutinen J, Sorensen AG. Automated perfusion-weighted MRI using localized arterial input functions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:1133-1139.
8. Mouridsen K, Christensen S, Gyldensted L, Ostergaard L. Automatic selection of arterial input function using cluster analysis. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:524-531.
9. Gruner R, Taxt T. Iterative blind deconvolution in magnetic resonance brain perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:805-815.
10. Wu O, Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Benner T, Rosen BR, Sorensen AG. Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block-circulant deconvolution matrix. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:164-174.
11. Smith MR, Lu H, Trochet S, Frayne R. Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artifacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:631-634.
12. Jain RK, Tong RT, Munn LL. Effect of vascular normalization by anti- angiogenic therapy on interstitial hypertension, peritumor edema, and lymphatic metastasis: insights from a mathematical model. Cancer Res 2007;67:2729-2735.
13. Chen JJ, Smith MR, Frayne R. The impact of partial-volume effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:390-399.
14. Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Quantification of perfusion using bolus tracking magnetic resonance imaging in stroke: assumptions, limitations, and potential implications for clinical use. Stroke 2002;33:1146-1151.
15. Kjolby BF, Ostergaard L, Kiselev VG. Theoretical model of intravascular paramagnetic tracers effect on tissue relaxation. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:187-197.
16. Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:466-473.
17. Fu H, NG MK, Nikolova M, Barlow JL. Efficient Minimization Methods of Mixed l2-l1 and l1-l1 Norms for Image Restoration. SIAM J Sci Comput 2006;27:1881-1902.
18. Stewart GN. Researches on the Circulation Time in Organs and on the Influences which affect it: parts I.-III. J Physiol 1893;15:1-89.
19. Liu HL, Pu Y, Liu Y, Nickerson L, Andrews T, Fox PT, Gao JH. Cerebral blood flow measurement by dynamic contrast MRI using singular value decomposition with an adaptive threshold. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:167-172.
20. Andersen IK, Szymkowiak A, Rasmussen CE, Hanson LG, Marstrand JR, Larsson HB, Hansen LK. Perfusion quantification using Gaussian process deconvolution. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:351-361.
21. Salluzzi M, Frayne R, Smith MR. An alternative viewpoint of the similarities and differences of SVD and FT deconvolution algorithms used for quantitative MR perfusion studies. Magn Reson Imaging 2005;23:481-492.
22. Wirestam R, Ståhlberg F. Wavelet-based noise reduction for improved deconvolution of time-series data in dynamic susceptibility-contrast MRI. MAGMA 2005;18:113-118.
23. Sakoglu U, Sood R. Cerebral blood flow estimation from perfusion- weighted MRI using FT-based MMSE filtering method. Magn Reson Imag 2008;26:313-322.
24. Chen JJ, Smith MR, Frayne R. Advantages of frequency-domain modeling in dynamic-susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance cerebral blood flow quantification. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:700-707.
25. Vonken EP, Beekman FJ, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Maximum likelihood estimation of cerebral blood flow in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:343-350.
26. Willats L, Connelly A, Calamante F. Improved deconvolution of per- fusion MRI data in the presence of bolus delay and dispersion. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:146-156.
27. Smith MR, Lu H, Frayne R. Signal-to-noise ratio effects in quantitative cerebral perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:122-128.
28. Calamante F. Bolus dispersion issues related to the quantification of perfusion MRI data. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:718-722.
29. Salluzzi M, Frayne R, Smith MR. Is correction necessary when clinically determining quantitative cerebral perfusion parameters from multi-slice dynamic susceptibility contrast MR studies? Phys Med Biol 2006;51:407-424.
30. Hansen P, editor. Rank-deficient and discrete ill-posed problems. Numerical aspects of linear inversion. Philadelphia: SIAM; 1998.