Iterative blind deconvolution in magnetic resonance brain perfusion imaging

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 805-815

  Grüner, Renate ^a,b   Taxt, Torfinn ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Iterative blind deconvolution; Leakage; Local arterial input function; MR perfusion imaging; Recirculation; Richardson Lucy deconvolution

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CONVOLUTION; DISPERSIONS; ITERATIVE METHODS; LEAKAGE (FLUID);

ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; ITERATIVE BLIND DECONVOLUTION; MR PERFUSION IMAGING; RECIRCULATIONS; RICHARDSON-LUCY;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; ARTICLE; ASTROCYTOMA; BRAIN CIRCULATION; BRAIN PERFUSION; CASE REPORT; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; COLLATERAL CIRCULATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FIBROMUSCULAR DYSPLASIA; FIRST PASS EFFECT; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TIME;

EID: 33645767626     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20850     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:715-725.
2. Sorensen AG, Reimer P. Cerebral MR perfusion imaging; principles and current applications. New York: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2000. 162 p.
3. Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, Becker CR, Guckel F, Lorenz WJ. Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994;193:637-641.
4. Alsop DC, Wedmid A, Schlaug G. Defining a local input function for perfusion quantification with bolus MRI. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Honolulu, HI, USA, 2002. p 659.
5. Calamante F, Morup M, Hansen LK. Defining a local arterial input function for perfusion MRI using independent component analysis. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:789-797.
6. Vonken EPA, Beekman FJ, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Maximum likelihood estimation of cerebral blood flow in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:343-350.
7. Andersen IK, Szymkowiak A, Rasmussen CE, Hanson LG, Marstrand JR, Larsson HB, Hansen LK. Perfusion quantification using Gaussian process deconvolution. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:351-361.
8. Wu O, Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Benner T, Rosen BR, Sorensen AG. Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with block-circulant deconvolution matrix. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:164-174.
9. Yamada K, Wu O, Gonzalez RG, Bakker D, Ostergaard L, Copen WA, Weisskoff RM, Rosen BR, Yagi K, Nishimura T, Sorensen AG. Magnetic resonance perfusion-weighted imaging of acute cerebral infarction: effect of the calculation methods and underlying vasculopathy. Stroke 2002;33:87-94.
10. Weisskoff RM, Belliveau JW, Kwong KK, Rosen BR. Functional MR imaging of capillary hemodynamics. In: Potchen EJ, Haake EM, Siebert JE, Gottschalk A, editors. Magnetic resonance angiography. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993. p 473-484.
11. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, Evelhoch JL, Henderson E, Knopp MV, Larsson HB, Lee T-Y, Mayr NA, Parker GJ, Port RE, Taylor J, Weisskoff RM. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of diffusible tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:223-232.
12. 2*-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:961-968.
13. Vonken EP, van Osch MJ, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Simultaneous quantitative cerebral perfusion and Gd-DTPA extravasation measurement with dual-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:820-827.
14. Kreyszig, E. Advanced engineering mathematics. New York: Wiley; 1999. 1156 p.
15. Richardson WH. Bayesian-based iterative method of image restoration. J Opt Soc Am 1972;62:55-59.
16. Lucy LB. An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions. Astron J 1974;79:745-765.
17. Bi H, Boerner G. When does the Richardson-Lucy deconvolution converge? Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 1994;108:409-415.
18. Shepp LA, Vardi Y. Maximum Likelihood reconstructions for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1982;1:113-122.
19. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc B 1977;39:1-38.
20. Holmes TJ. Blind deconvolution of quantum-limited incoherent imagery: maximum-likelihood approach. J Opt Soc Am A 1995;9:1052-1062.
21. Fish DA, Brinicombe AM, Pike ER. Blind deconvolution by means of the Richardson-Lucy algorithm. J Opt Soc Am A 1995;12:58-65.
22. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannerby BP. Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992. 1002 p.
23. Aronen HJ, Gazit IE, Louise DN, Buchbinder BR, Pardo FS, Weisskoff RM, Harsch GR, Cosgrove GR, Halpern EF, Hochberg FH, et al. Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings. Radiology 1994;191:41-51.
24. Oppenheim AV, Schafer RW, Stockham TG. Non-linear filtering of multiplied and convolved signals. Proc IEEE 1968;56:1264-1291.
25. Stockham TG, Cannon TM, Ingebretsen RB. Blind deconvolution through digital signal processing. Proc IEEE 1986;63:678-692.
26. Kundur D, Hatzinakos D. Blind image deconvolution. IEEE Signal Processing Mag 1996;13:43-64.
27. Ayers GR, Dainty JC. Iterative blind deconvolution method and its application. Opt Lett 1988;13:547-549.
28. Kundur D. Blind deconvolution of still images using recursive filtering. MSc.thesis, University of Toronto, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering; 1995.
29. McCallum BC. Blind deconvolution by simulated annealing. Opt Commun 1990;75:101-105.
30. Tsumuraya F. Deconvolution based on the Wiener-Lucy chain algorithm: an approach to recover local information losses in the deconvolution procedure. Richardson-Lucy algorithm. J Opt Soc Am A 1996;13:1532-1536.