Hemiparetic optimal practice and evaluation (H.O.P.E.) for the stroke survivor with very low hand function

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 586-592

  Carter, Valerie ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hemiparesis; Low function; Neuroplasticity; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BALANCE IMPAIRMENT; BODY WEIGHT; DISABLED PERSON; FALL RISK; GAIT; HAND FUNCTION; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; REHABILITATION CARE; STROKE PATIENT; SURVIVOR; TREADMILL;

ADULT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE;

EID: 60449116705     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1506-586     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday C. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2007 update: A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2007;115:e69-e171.
2. Heart and Stroke Facts. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 2002.
3. Dobkin B. The economic impact of stroke. Neurology. 1995;45:86-89
4. Duncan P. Synthesis of intervention trails to improve motor recovery following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1997;3:1-20.
5. Olsen TS. Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1990;21:247-251.
6. Thorngren M, Westling B. Rehabilitation and achieved health quality after stroke: A population-based study of 258 hospitalized cases followed for one year. Acta Neurol Scand. 1990;82:374-380.
7. Smith D, Akhtar A, Garraway W. Motor function after stroke. Age Ageing 1985;14:46-48.
8. Parker VM, Wade DT, Hewer RL. Loss of arm function after stroke: Measurement, frequency, and recovery. Int Rehabil Med. 1986;8:69-73.
9. Thorngren M, Westling B. Rehabilitation and achieved health quality after stroke: A population-based study of 258 hospitalized cases followed for one year. Acta Neurol Scand. 1990;82:374-380.
10. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci. 1996;16:785-807.
11. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75:2144-2149.
12. Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM, Ochs MT, Allard T, Guic-Robles E. Functional reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in adult owl monkeys after behaviorally controlled tactile stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 1990;3:82-104.
13. Elbert T, Pantev C, Wienbruch C, Rockstroh B, Taub E. Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science. 1995;270:305-307.
14. Sterr A, Müller MM, Elbert T, Rockstroh B, Pantev C, Taub E. Changed perceptions in Braille readers. Nature. 1998;391:134-135.
15. Langhome P, Wagenaar R, Partridge C. Physiotherapy after stroke: More is better? Physiother Res Int. 1996;1:75-88
16. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar R, Koelmen T, Lankhorst G, Koetsier J. Effects of intensity of stroke rehabilitation a research synthesis. Stroke. 1997;28:1550-1556.
17. Kleim J, Jones T. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: Implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hearing Res. 2008:51;S225-S239.
18. Taub E, Morris, D. Constraint-induced movement therapy to enhance recovery after stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2001;3:279-286.
19. Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, Miltner WH, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000;31:1210-1216.
20. Tarkka IM, Pitkanen K, Sivenius J. Paretic hand rehabilitation with constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84:501-505.
21. Morris D, Crago JE, DeLuca SC, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabilitation. 1997;9:29-43.
22. Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, et al. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization for stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000;31:1210-1216.
23. Wolf S, Winstein C, Miller P, et al. Effects of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on upper extremity function 3-9 months after stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;296:2095-2104.
24. Page S, Levine P. Modifed constraint-induced therapy in patients with chronic stroke exhibiting minimal movement ability in the affected arm. Phys Ther. 2002;87:873-878.
25. Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, et al. Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: A clinical practice guideline. Stroke. 2005;36:e100-e143.
26. Miltner W, Bauder H, Sommer M, et al. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: A replication. Stroke. 1999;30:586-692.
27. Wolf S. Revisiting Constraint Induced Movement Therapy: Are we too smitten with the mitten? Is all nonuse "learned"? and other quandaries. Phys Ther. 2007;87(9):1212-1223.
28. Bonifer N, Anderson K, Arciniegas D. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: Efficacy for patients with minimal upper extremity motor ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;36:237-251.
29. Bonifer N, Anderson K. Application of constraint induced movement therapy for an individual with severe chronic upper extremity hemiplegia. Phys Ther. 2003;83:384-398.
30. Kwakkel C, Kollen B, Twisk J. Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:2348-2353.
31. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther. 1983;63:1606-1610.
32. Wolf S, Catlin P, Ellis M, Archer A, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1635-1639.
33. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1999.
34. Harris-Love M, McCombe Waller S, Whitall J. Exploiting inter-limb coupling to improve paretic arm reaching performance in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(11):2131-2137.
35. Van Peppen R, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks H, Van der Wees P, Dekkler J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: What's the evidence? Stroke. 2004;18:833-862.
36. Kwakkel G, Van Peppen R, Wagenaar R, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke. Stroke. 2004;35;2529-2536.
37. Winstein C, Gardner E, McNeal D, Barto P, Nicholson D. Standing balance training: Effects on balance and locomotion in hemiparetic adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70:755-762.
38. Nichols-Larsen D, Clark PC, Zerinque A, Greenspan A. Factors influencing stroke surviviors' quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke. 2005;36:1480.
39. Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S, Reker D, Lai SM, Richards L. Daily functioning and quality of life in a randomized controlled trial of therapeutic exercise for subacute stroke survivors. Stroke. 2005;36:1764-1770.
40. Seitz R, Azari N, Knorr U, Binkofski F, Herzog H, Freund HJ. The role of diaschisis in stroke recovery. Stroke. 1999;30:1844-1850.
41. Kugler C, Alternhoner T, Lochner P. Does age influence early recovery from ischemic stroke? J Neurol. 2003;250:676-681.
42. Duncan P, Wallace D, Lai S, Johnson D, Emebrestson S, Laster L. The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0: Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30:2131-2140.
43. Duncan PW, Lai SM, Bode RK, Perera S, DeRosa JT. Stroke Impact Scale-16 (SIS-16): A brief instrument for assessing physical function in stroke patients. Neurology. 2003;60:291-296.