Paretic hand rehabilitation with constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 84, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 501-505

  Tarkka, Ina M ^a   Pitkänen, Kauko ^a   Sivenius, Juhani ^a  

^a Brain Research and Rehabilitation Center Neuron   (Finland)

Author keywords

Chronic Stroke; Motor Control; Movement Therapy; Neurorehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISABILITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ENDURANCE; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT THERAPY; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT;

ADULT; CHRONIC DISEASE; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL;

EID: 20544455114     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.phm.0000166881.71097.9d     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Stineman MG, Maislin G, Fiedler RC, et al: A prediction model for functional recovery in stroke. Stroke 1997;28: 550-6
2. Taub E: Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: Implications for rehabilitation medicine, in Ince LP, ed: Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine: Clinical Applications. New York, Williams and Wilkins, 1980, pp 371-401
3. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA,: Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:347-54
4. Elbert T, Flor H, Birbaumer N,: Extensive reorganization of the somatosensory cortex in adult humans after nervous system injury. Neuroreport 1994;5:2593-7
5. Miltner WR, Bauder H, Sommer M, et al: Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: A replication. Stroke 1999;30: 586-92
6. Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I, et al: Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: An exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1374-7
7. Sterr A, Freivogel S: Motor-improvement following intensive training in low-functioning chronic hemiparesis. Neurology 2003;61:842-4
8. Grotta JC, Noser EA, Boake C, et al: Constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke 2004; 35(11 suppl 1):2699-701
9. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, et al: Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989;104:125-32
10. Guyatt GH, Walter S, Norman G: Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chron Dis 1987;40:171-8
11. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, et al: Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:624-8
12. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, Sifuentes F, et al: Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 1996;272:1791-4
13. Liepert J, Miltner W, Bauder H, et al: Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998;250:5-8
14. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R: Constraint-induced movement therapy: A new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation. A clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999;36:1-17