Introduction

Higher Education Research and Development

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 165-172

  Bain, John D ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013913238     PISSN: 07294360     EISSN: 14698366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0729436990180201     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. Alexander, S., and Hedberg, J., 1994. “ Evaluating technology-based learning: Which model? ”. In Multimedia in higher education: Designing for change in teaching and learning, Edited by: Beattie, K., McNaught, C., and Wills, S., 233–244. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2. Alexander, S., and McKenzie, J., 1998. An evaluation of information technology projects in university learning, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Services (AGPS).
3. Gunn, C., 1997. Future directions for CAL evaluation. Association of Learning Technology Journal, 5(1): 40–47.
4. Hayden, M., and Speedy, G., 1995. Evaluation of the 1993 National Teaching Development Grants, Canberra: Committee for the Advancement of University Teaching (CAUT).
5. King, K., and Kitchener, K.S., 1994. Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Laurillard, D., 1993. Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology, London: Routledge.
7. Laurillard, D., 1994. “ The role of formative evaluation in the progress of multimedia ”. In Multimedia in higher education: Designing for change in teaching and learning, Edited by: Beattie, K., McNaught, C., and Wills, S., 287–293. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
8. Oliver, M., 1998. A framework for evaluating the use of educational technology, London, England: University of London. Available at: http://www.unl.ac.uk/latid/elt/reportl.htm
9. Reeves, T.C., Effective dimensions of interactive learning systems. Information Technology for Training and Education Conference — ITTE ‘92. pp. 99–113. Brisbane: University of Queensland.
10. Reeves, T.C., 1997. “ Established and emerging evaluation paradigms for instructional design ”. In Instructional development paradigms, Edited by: Dills, C.R., and Romiszowski, A.J., 163–178. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
11. Reeves, T.C., and Reeves, P.M., 1997. “ Effective dimensions of interactive learning on the world wide web ”. In Web-based instruction, Edited by: Khan, B.H., 59–66. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
12. Sommerlad, E., 1997. Evaluation of the impacts of the 1994 National Teaching Development Grants, Canberra: Committee for University Teaching and Staff Development (CUTSD).