Increased cell proliferation in spleen and lymph nodes peripheral to contact allergen application site

Toxicology

Volumn 257, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 113-116

  Chipinda, Itai ^a   Anderson, Stacey E ^a   Butterworth, Leon F ^a   Beezhold, Donald ^a   Siegel, Paul D ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Contact sensitizer; Local lymph node assay; Peripheral lymph nodes; Spleen

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDE; ALLERGEN; HEXYLCINNAMALDEHYDE; OXAZOLONE; THYMIDINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIGENICITY; ARTICLE; AXILLARY LYMPH NODE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EAR; FEMALE; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; LYMPH NODE; LYMPHATIC DRAINAGE; LYMPHOCYTE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIZATION; SPLEEN; SPLEEN CELL;

ALLERGENS; ANIMALS; CELL PROLIFERATION; DERMATITIS, CONTACT; FEMALE; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; LYMPH NODES; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; OXAZOLONE; SPLEEN; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC; THYMIDINE;

ANIMALIA; MUS;

EID: 60249103711     PISSN: 0300483X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.12.019     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Buehler E.V. Delayed contact hypersensitivity in the Guinea pig. Arch. Dermatol. 91 (1965) 171-177
2. Dean J.H., Twerdok L.E., Tice R.R., Sailstad D.M., Hattan D.G., and Stokes W.S. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 34 3 (2001) 258-273
3. Jowsey I.R., Clapp C.J., Safford B., Gibbons B.T., and Basketter D.A. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay. Cutan. Ocul. Toxicol. 27 2 (2008) 67-75
4. Kimber I., Dearman R.J., Basketter D.A., Ryan C.A., and Gerberick G.F. The local lymph node assay: past, present and future. Contact Dermatitis 47 6 (2002) 315-328
5. Kimber I., Dearman R.J., Betts C.J., Gerberick G.F., Ryan C.A., Kern P.S., Patlewicz G.Y., and Basketter D.A. The local lymph node assay and skin sensitization: a cut-down screen to reduce animal requirements?. Contact Dermatitis 54 4 (2006) 181-185
6. Kimber I., Dearman R.J., Scholes E.W., and Basketter D.A. The local lymph node assay: developments and applications. Toxicology 93 1 (1994) 13-31
7. Magnusson B., and Kligman A.M. Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Guinea Pig. Identification of Contact Allergens (1970), Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL
8. Porter C.J., Edwards G.A., and Charman S.A. Lymphatic transport of proteins after s.c. injection: implications of animal model selection. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 50 1-2 (2001) 157-171
9. Ryan C.A., Chaney J.G., Kern P.S., Patlewicz G.Y., Basketter D.A., Betts C.J., Dearman R.J., Kimber I., and Gerberick G.F. The reduced local lymph node assay: the impact of group size. J. Appl. Toxicol. 28 4 (2008) 518-523
10. Siegel P.D., Fedorowicz A., Butterworth L.F., Law B., Anderson S.E., Snyder J., and Beezhold D. Physical-chemical and solvent considerations in evaluating the influence of carbon chain length on the skin sensitization activity of 1-bromoalkanes. Toxicol. Sci. 107 1 (2009) 78-84
11. Swartz M.A. The physiology of the lymphatic system. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 50 1-2 (2001) 3-20
12. Van den Broeck W., Derore A., and Simoens P. Anatomy and nomenclature of murine lymph nodes: descriptive study and nomenclatory standardization in BALB/cAnNCrl mice. J. Immunol. Methods 312 1-2 (2006) 12-19