Disentangling effects of auditory distraction and of stimulus-response sequence

Psychophysiology

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 425-438

  Roeber, Urte ^a   Berti, Stefan ^b   Müller, Dagmar ^a   Widmann, Andreas ^a   Schröger, Erich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory distraction; Involuntary attention; P3a; P3b; Sequential effects

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ATTENTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 60049088667     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00766.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Barcelo, F., Escera, C., Corral, M. J. Perianez, J. A. (2006). Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1734 1748.
2. Barcelo, F., Perianez, J. Nyhus, E. (2008). An information theoretical approach to task-switching: Evidence from cognitive brain potentials in humans. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 1, 13.
3. Bendixen, A., Roeber, U. Schröger, E. (2007). Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1664 1677.
4. Bertelson, P. (1961). Sequential redundancy and speed in a serial two-choice responding task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 90 102.
5. Bertelson, P. (1965). Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition. Nature, 206, 217 218.
6. Berti, S. (2008a). Object switching within working memory is reflected in the human event-related brain potential. Neuroscience Letters, 434, 200 205.
7. Berti, S. (2008b). Cognitive control after distraction: event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation. Psychophysiology, 45, 608 620.
8. Berti, S., Roeber, U. Schröger, E. (2004). Bottom-up influences on working memory: Behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength. Experimental Psychology, 51, 249 257.
9. Berti, S. Schröger, E. (2001). A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: Behavioral and event-related indices. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 265 273.
10. Berti, S. Schröger, E. (2003). Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: Evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1119 1122.
11. Berti, S. Schröger, E. (2004). Distraction effects in vision: Behavioral and event-related potential indices. Neuroreport, 15, 665 669.
12. Berti, S. Schröger, E. (2006). Visual distraction: A behavioral and event-related brain potential study in humans. Neuroreport, 17, 151 155.
13. Campbell, K. C. Proctor, R. W. (1993). Repetition effects with categorizable stimulus and response sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1345 1362.
14. Coles, M. G. H., Smid, H. G. O., Scheffers, M. K. Otten, L. J. (1995). Mental chronometry and the study of human information processing. In M. D. Rugg M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (pp. 86 131). London : Oxford University Press.
15. Comerchero, M. D. Polich, J. (1999). P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 24 30.
16. Escera, C., Alho, K., Schröger, E. Winkler, I. (2000). Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 5, 151 166.
17. Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I. Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590 604.
18. Escera, C. Corral, M. J. (2007). Role of mismatch negativity and novelty-P3 in involuntary auditory attention. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 251 264.
19. Escera, C., Yago, E. Alho, K. (2001). Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching. European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 877 883.
20. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494 500.
21. Horvath, J., Czigler, I., Birkas, E., Winkler, I. Gervai, J. (2007). Age-related differences in distraction and reorientation in an auditory task. Neurobiology of Aging, doi : [Epub ahead of print].
22. Jääskeläinen, I. P., Alho, K., Escera, C., Winkler, I., Sillanaukee, P. Näätänen, R. (1996). Effects of ethanol and auditory distraction on forced choice reaction time. Alcohol, 13, 153 156.
23. Jankowiak, S. Berti, S. (2007). Behavioral and event-related potential distraction effects with regularly occurring auditory deviants. Psychophysiology, 44, 79 85.
24. Jentzsch, I. Sommer, W. (2001). Sequence-sensitive subcomponents of P300: Topographical analyses and dipole source localization. Psychophysiology, 38, 607 621.
25. Johnson, R., Jr. (1986). A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology, 23, 367 384.
26. Kähkönen, S., Ahveninen, J., Pekkonen, E., Kaakkola, S., Huttunen, J., Ilmoniemi, R. J. Jääskeläinen, I. P. (2002). Dopamine modulates involuntary attention shifting and reorienting: An electromagnetic study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1894 1902.
27. Kleinsorge, T. (1999). Response repetition benefits and costs. Acta Psychologica, 103, 295 310.
28. Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75 82.
29. Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W. Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339 354.
30. Leuthold, H. Sommer, W. (1993). Stimulus presentation rate dissociates sequential effects in event-related potentials and reaction times. Psychophysiology, 30, 510 517.
31. Mager, R., Falkenstein, M., Stormer, R., Brand, S., Muller-Spahn, F. Bullinger, A. H. (2005). Auditory distraction in young and middle-aged adults: A behavioural and event-related potential study. Journal of Neural Transmission, 112, 1165 1176.
32. Munka, L. Berti, S. (2006). Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential. Neuroscience Letters, 396, 177 181.
33. Näätänen, R., Alho, K. Schröger, E. (2002). Electrophysiology of attention. In H. Pashler J. Wixted (Eds.), Steven's handbook of experimental psychology, (3rd ed., vol. 4) Methodology in experimental psychology (pp. 601 653). New York : John Wiley.
34. Näätänen, R. Winkler, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 826 859.
35. Notebaert, W. Soetens, E. (2003). The influence of irrelevant stimulus changes on stimulus and response repetition effects. Acta Psychologica, 112, 143 156.
36. Pashler, H. Baylis, G. C. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 33 48.
37. Polich, J. (2003). Theoretical overview of P3a and P3b. In J. Polich (Ed.), Detection of change: Event-related potential and fMRI findings (pp. 83 98). Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
38. Polich, J. (2007). Updating p300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128 2148.
39. Quinlan, P. T. (1999). Sequential effects in auditory choice reaction time tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 297 303.
40. Roeber, U., Berti, S., Widmann, A. Schröger, E. (2005). Response repetition vs. response change modulates behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distraction. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 451 456.
41. Roeber, U., Widmann, A. Schröger, E. (2003). Auditory distraction by duration and location deviants: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 347 357.
42. Schröger, E., Giard, M. H. Wolff, C. (2000). Auditory distraction: Event-related potential and behavioral indices. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 1450 1460.
43. Schröger, E. Wolff, C. (1998a). Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. Neuroreport, 9, 3355 3358.
44. Schröger, E. Wolff, C. (1998b). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 71 87.
45. Smith, M. C. (1968). Repetition effect and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 435 439.
46. Soetens, E. (1998). Localizing sequential effects in serial choice reaction time with the information reduction procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 547 568.
47. Soetens, E. Notebaert, W. (2005). Response monitoring and expectancy in random serial RT tasks. Acta Psychologica, 119, 189 216.
48. Sommer, W., Leuthold, H. Soetens, E. (1999). Covert signs of expectancy in serial reaction time tasks revealed by event-related potentials. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 342 353.
49. Squires, K., Petuchowski, S., Wickens, C. Donchin, E. (1977). Effects of stimulus sequence on event related potentials: A comparison of visual and auditory sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 31 40.
50. Squires, K. C., Wickens, C., Squires, N. K. Donchin, E. (1976). The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. Science, 193, 1142 1146.
51. Verleger, R. (1997). On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology, 34, 131 156.