What motivates nonconformity? Uniqueness seeking blocks majority influence

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 309-320

  Imhoff, Roland ^a   Erb, Hans Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b HELMUT SCHMIDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Consensus; Majority; Minority; Social influence; Uniqueness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MOTIVATION; PERSONALITY; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HIERARCHY, SOCIAL; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTIVATION; PERSONALITY; PILOT PROJECTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL CONFORMITY; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 59949097012     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: 15527433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167208328166     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Asch, S.E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70, 1-70.
2. Axsom, D., Yates, S., & Chaiken, S. (1987). Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 30-40.
3. Baker, S.M., & Petty, R.E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 5-19.
4. Bond, R., & Smith, P.B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111-137.
5. Brewer, M.B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
6. Brewer, M.B., & Pickett, C.L. (1999). Distinctiveness motive as a source of the social self. In T. R. Tyler, R. M. Kramer, & O. P. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 71-87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Brewer, M.B., & Roccas, S. (2001). Individual values, social identity, and optimal distinctiveness. In C. Sedikides & M. Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 219-237). New York: Psychology.
8. Chaiken, S., & Stangor, C. (1987). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 575-630.
9. Cialdini, R.B. (1993). Influence: Science and practice. New York: HarperCollins.
10. Cialdini, R.B., & Trost, M.R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, (Vol. 2, 4 th ed., pp. 151-192). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/ Correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3 rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Crano, W.D. (2001). Social influence, social identity, and ingroup leniency. In N. K. De Vries & C. K. W. De Dreu (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 122-143). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
13. Darke, P., Chaiken, S., Bohner, G., Einwiller, S., Erb, H.-P., & Hazlewood, D. (1998). Accuracy motivation, consensus information, and the law of large numbers: Effects on attitude judgment in the absence of argumentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1205-1215.
14. David, B., & Turner, J.C. (1996). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: Is being a member of the out-group an advantage ? British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 179-199.
15. David, B., & Turner, J.C. (2001). Majority and minority influence: A single process self-categorization analysis. In N. K. De Vries & C. K. W. De Dreu (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 91-121). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
16. De Dreu, C.K.W. (2007). Minority dissent, attitude change, and group performance. In A. R. Pratkanis (Ed.), The science of social influence (pp. 247-270). New York: Psychology.
17. De Dreu, C.K.W., De Vries, N.K., Franssen, H., & Altink, W. (1999). Minority dissent in organizations: Factors influencing willingness to dissent. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 2451-2466.
18. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H.B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
19. Erb, H.-P. (1998). Sozialer Einfluss durch Konsens: Werbung mit Meinungsübereinstimmung [Social influence through consensus: Advertising with shared attitudes]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 29, 156-164.
20. Erb, H.-P., & Bohner, G. (2007). Social influence and persuasion: Recent theoretical developments and integrative attempts. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Frontiers of social psychology: Social communication (pp. 191-221). Hove, UK: Psychology.
21. Erb, H.-P., Bohner, G., Werth, L., Hewstone, M., & Reinhard, M.-A. (2006). Large minorities and small majorities: Interactive effects of inferred and explicit consensus on attitudes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 221-231.
22. Erb, H.-P., Bohner, G., Rank, S., & Einwiller, S. (2002). Processing minority and majority communications: The role of conflict with prior attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1172-1182.
23. Erb, H.-P., Bohner, G., Schmälzle, K., & Rank, S. (1998). Beyond conflict and discrepancy: Cognitive bias in minority and majority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 620-633.
24. Fromkin, H.L. (1970). Effects of experimentally aroused feelings of undistinctiveness upon valuation of scarce and novel experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 521-529.
25. Fromkin, H.L. (1972). Feelings of interpersonal undistinctiveness: An unpleasant affective state. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 178-185.
26. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
27. Higgins, E.T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
28. Hornsey, M.J., & Jetten, J. (2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 248-264.
29. Kim, H., & Markus, H.R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 785-800.
30. Kruglanski, A.W. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 493-529). New York: Guilford.
31. Kruglanski, A.W., & Mackie, D.M. (1990). Majority and minority influence: A judgmental process analysis. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 229-261.
32. Latané, B., & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88, 438-453.
33. Le Pine, J., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853-868.
34. Lynn, M., & Harris, J. (1997). Individual differences in the pursuit of self-uniqueness through consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1861-1883.
35. Lynn, M., & Snyder, C.R. (2002). Uniqueness seeking. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 395-419). New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Maass, A., & Clark, R.D. (1984). Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 428-450.
37. Mackie, D.M. (1987). Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 41-52.
38. Maheswaran, D., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in low motivation settings: The effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 13-25.
39. Maslach, C. (1974). Social and personal bases of individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 411-425.
40. Maslach, C., Stapp, J., & Santee, R.T. (1985). Individuation: Conceptual analysis and assessment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 729-738.
41. McGuire, W.J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 233-346). New York: Newbery Award Records.
42. Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press.
43. Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behaviour. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209-239). New York: Academic Press.
44. Moscovici, S., Lage, E., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32, 365-379.
45. Moscovici, S., & Perez, J.A. (2007). A study of minorities as victims. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 725-746.
46. Mugny, G. (1975). Negotiations, image of the other, and the process of minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 209-228.
47. Mugny, G. (1982). The power of minorities. London: Academic Press.
48. Nail, P.R. (1986). Toward an integration of some models and theories of social response. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 190-206.
49. Nowak, A., Szamrej, J., & Latané, B. (1990). From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review, 97, 362-376.
50. Pickett, C.L., Silver, M.D., & Brewer, M.B. (2002). The impact of assimilation and differentiation needs on perceived group importance and judgments of ingroup size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 546-558.
51. Sigall, H., Mucchi-Faina, A., & Mosso, C. (2006). Minority influence is facilitated when the communication employs linguistic abstract-ness. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 443-451.
52. Simonson, I., & Nowlis, S.M. (2000). The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: Unconventional choices based on reasons. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 49-68.
53. Snyder, C.R., & Fromkin, H.L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 518-527.
54. Snyder, C.R., & Fromkin, H.L. (1980). Uniqueness, the human pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum.
55. Tian, K.T., Bearden, W.O., & Hunter, G.L. (2001). Consumers' need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 50-66.
56. Turner, J.C. (1991). Social influence. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
57. Turner, J.C., Hogg, M., Oakes, P., Reicher, S., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
58. Vignoles, V.L., Chryssochoou, X., & Breakwell, G.M. (2000). The distinctiveness principle: Identity, meaning, and the bounds of cultural relativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 337-354.
59. Watts, W.A., & Holt, L.E. (1979). Persistence of opinion change under conditions of forewarning and distraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 778-789.
60. White, G.L., & Zimbardo, P.G. (1980). The effects of threat of surveillance and actual surveillance on expressed opinions toward marijuana. Journal of Social Psychology, 111, 49-61.
61. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J.A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.
62. Ziller, R.C. (1964). Individuation and socialization: A theory of assimilation in large organizations. Human Relations, 17, 341-360.
63. Zimbardo, P.G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order vs. deindividuation, impulse and chaos. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 237-307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.