Embedding interactive whiteboards in teaching and learning: The process of change in pedagogic practice

Education and Information Technologies

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 291-303

  Lewin, Cathy ^a   Somekh, Bridget ^a   Steadman, Stephen ^b  

^a MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Change; Evaluation; Interactive whiteboards; Pedagogy

Indexed keywords

EID: 59849097566     PISSN: 13602357     EISSN: 15737608     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-008-9070-z     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. G. Beauchamp 2004 Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard in primary schools: towards an effective transition framework. Technology Pedagogy & Education 13 3 327 248
2. T. Fisher 2006 Educational transformation: is it, like "beauty", in the eye of the beholder, or will we know when we see it Education and Information Technologies 11 3-4 293 303
3. J. Gillen J. Kleine Staarman K. Littleton N. Mercer A. Twiner 2007 A 'learning revolution'? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British primary classrooms Learning, Media and Technology 32 3 243 256
4. D. Glover D. Miller D. Averis V. Door 2007 The evolution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard in mathematics and modern languages: an empirical analysis from the secondary sector Learning, Media and Technology 32 1 5 20
5. Goldstein, H. (1983). Multilevel statistical models (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
6. Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (1997). Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed-method evaluation. In J. C. Greene, & V. J Caracelli (Eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (pp. 5-18). San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass.
7. Haldane, M. (2005). A typology of interactive whiteboard pedagogies. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference, Glamorgan, September.
8. C. Jewitt G. Moss A. Cardini 2007 Pace, interactivity and multimodality in teachers' design of texts for interactive whiteboards in the secondary school classroom Learning, Media and Technology 32 3 303 317
9. S. Kennewell 2001 Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technology in teaching and learning Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 10 1-2 101 116
10. Kennewell, S. (2004) Researching the influence of interactive presentation tools on teacher pedagogy. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference, UMIST, Manchester, September.
11. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
12. Lewin, C., Scrimshaw, P., & Somekh, B. (in press). The impact of formal and informal professional development opportunities on primary teachers' adoption of interactive whiteboards. Technology, Pedagogy & Education (in press).
13. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
14. F. Smith F. Hardman S. Higgins 2006 The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies British Educational Research Journal 32 3 443 457
15. H. Smith S. Higgins K. Wall J. Miller 2005 Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21 91 101
16. Somekh, B. (2007). Pedagogy and learning with ICT: Researching the art of innovation. London and New York: Routledge.
17. Somekh, B., Underwood, J., Convery, A., Dillon, G., Jarvis, J., Lewin, C., et al. (2007a). Evaluation of the ICT test bed project: final report. Coventry, UK: BECTA.
18. Somekh, B., Haldane, M., Jones, K., Lewin, C., Steadman, S., Scrimshaw, P., et al. (2007b). Evaluation of the primary schools whiteboard project. Coventry, UK: BECTA.
19. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Teddlie, C., & Tashakorri, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social sciences. In A. Tashakorri, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (pp. 3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
21. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.