Genetics of quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana

Heredity

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 456-464

  Kearsey, M J ^a   Pooni, H S ^a   Syed, N H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dominance; Epistasis; Heritability; Heterosis; QTL analysis; Triple test cross

Indexed keywords

ECOTYPE; GENETICS; HERITABILITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARABIDOPSIS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CROSSES, GENETIC; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; TIME FACTORS;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 0242493919     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800306     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Doganlar S, Frary A, Tanksley SD (2000). The genetic basis of seed weight variation: tomato as a model system. Genetics 100: 1267-1273.
2. Jansen RC, Van Ooijen JW, Stam P, Lister C, Dean C (1995). Genotype-by-environment interaction in genetic mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci. Theor Appl Genet 91: 33-37.
3. Jayasekera NEM, Karunasekera KB, Kearsey MJ (1994). Genetics of production traits in Hevea brasiliensis (rubber). I. Changes in genetical control with age. Heredity 73: 650-656.
4. Kearsey MJ, Farquhar AJ (1998). QTL analysis in plants: where are we now? Heredity 80: 137-142.
5. Kearsey MJ, Hyne V (1994). QTL analysis: a simple 'marker-regression' approach. Theor App Genet 89: 698-702.
6. Kearsey MJ, Jinks JL (1968). A general method of detecting additive dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. I. Theory. Heredity 23: 403-409.
7. Kearsey MJ, Pooni HS (1996). The Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Chapman and Hall: London.
8. Koumproglou R, Wilkes TM, Townson P, Wang XY, Beynon J, Pooni HS et al (2002). STAIRS: a new genetic resource for functional genomic studies of Arabidopsis. Plant J 31: 355-364.
9. Lister C, Dean C (1993). Recombinant inbred lines for mapping RFLP and phenotypic markers in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 4: 745-750.
10. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998). Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA.
11. Mayo O, Hopkins AM (1985). Problems of estimating the minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation. Biom J 27: 181-187.
12. Melchinger AE, Utz HF, Schon CC (1998). QTL mapping using different testers and independent population samples in maize reveals low power of QTL detection and large bias in estimates of QTL effects. Genetics 149: 383-403.
13. Monforte AJ, Friedman E, Zamir D, Tanksley SD (2001). Comparison of a set of QTL NILs for chromosome 2 of tomato: deductions about natural variation and implications for germplasm utilization. Theor Appl Genet 102: 572-590.
14. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981). Biometry. WH Freeman and Co.: New York.
15. Tanksley SD (1993). Mapping polygenes. Annu Rev Genet 27: 205-233.
16. Utz HF, Melchinger AE, Schön CC (2000). Bias and sampling error of the estimated proportion of genetic variance explained by QTL determined from experimental data in maize using cross validation and validation with independent samples. Genetics 154: 1839-1849.
17. Wright S (1934). The results of crosses between inbred strains of guinea pigs differing in number of digits. Genetics 19: 537-551.