Modeling, analysis and reliability of seismically excited structures: Computational issues

International Journal of Computational Methods

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 483-511

  Fragiadakis, Michalis ^a,b   Papadrakakis, Manolis ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY   (Greece)

Author keywords

Earthquake engineering; Fiber element; Modeling; Nonlinear analysis; Structural analysis; Time history analysis; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ARTS COMPUTING; CIVIL ENGINEERING; COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS; CONCRETE BRIDGES; EARTHQUAKES; ENGINEERING; ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; FIBER ELEMENT; MODELING; TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 59149104898     PISSN: 02198762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219876208001674     Document Type: Review

References (120)

1. Abrahamson, N. A. and Bommer, J. J. [2005] Probability and uncertainty in seismic hazard analysis, Earthq. Spectra 21(2), 603-607.
2. Addessi, D. and Ciampi, V. [2007] A regularized force-based beam element with a damage-plastic section constitutive law, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 70(5), 610-629.
3. Alemdar, B. N. and White, D. W. [2005] Displacement, flexibility and mixed beam-column finite element formulations for distributed plasticity analysis, J. Struct. Eng. 131(12), 1811-1819.
4. Anagnostopoulos, S. [1981] Inelastic beams for seismic ananlysis of structrures, J. Struct. Eng. 107(7), 1297-1311.
5. Antoniou, S. and Pinho, R. [2004] Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure, J. Earthq. Eng. 8(5), 643-661.
6. Argyris, J. H., Hilpert, O., Malejannakis, G. A. and Scharpf, D. W. [1979] On the geometrical stiffness of a beam in space - a consistent v. w. approach, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 20(1), 105-131.
7. Argyris, J. H., Boni, B., Hindenlang, U. and Kleiber, M. [1982] Finite element analysis of two- and three-dimensional elasto-plastic frames - the natural approach, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 110 11), 221-248.
8. Armero, F. [2006] Energy-dissipative momentum-conserving time-stepping algorithms for finite strain multiplicative plasticity, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 195(37-40), 4862-4889.
9. ATC-40, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings (Applied Technology Council, California Seismic Safety Commission, Redwood City, California, USA, 1996).
10. Bairan, G. J. M. and Mari, A. R. [2007] Shear-bending-torsion interaction in structural concrete members: A nonlinear coupled sectional approach, Arch. Comput. Meth. Eng. 14(3), 249-278.
11. Banon, H., Biggs, J. and Irvine, M. [1981] Seismic damage in reinforced concrete frames, J. Struct. Eng. 107(9), 1713-1729.
12. Barbat, A. H., Oller, S., Onate, E. and Hanganu, A. [1997] Viscous damage model for Timoshenko beam structures, Int. J. Solids Struct. 34(30), 3953-3976.
13. Barbato, M. and Conte, J. P. [2005] Finite element response sensitivity analysis: A comparison between force-based and displacement-based frame element models, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 194(12-16), 1479-1512.
14. Bathe, K. J. and Cimento, A. P. [1980] Some practical procedures for the solution of nonlinear finite element equations, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 22(1), 59-85.
15. Bathe, K. J. and Dvorkin, E. N. [1983] On the automatic solution of non-linear finite element equations, Comput. Struct. 17 5-6), 871-879.
16. Batoz, J. L. and Dhatt, G. [1979] Incremental displacement algorithms for non-linear problems, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 26, 1262-1267.
17. Bazant, S. and Bhat, P. [1977] Prediction of hysteresis in reinforced concrete members, J. Struct. Eng. 103(1), 151-167.
18. Bazant, Z. P. and Planas, J. Fracture and Size Effect in Concrete and Other Quasi-Brittle Materials (CRC, 1998).
19. Bergman, L. A. et al. [1997] A state-of-the-art report on computational stochastic mechanics, Prob. Eng. Mech. 12(4), 197-321.
20. Comitee Euro-International du Beton CEB. RC frames under earthquake loading: State of the art report (1996).
21. Ceresa, P., Petrini, L. and Pinho, R. [2007] Flexure-shear fiber beam-column elements for modeling frame structures under seismic loading - state of the art, J. Earthq. Eng. 11(1), 46-88.
22. Chopra, A. K. [1995] Dynamics of Structures (Prentice-Hall, New York).
23. Chopra, A. K. and Goel, R. K. [2004] A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 33(8), 903-927.
24. Clough, R. and Benuska, L. [1967] Nonlinear earthquake behavior of tall buildings, J. Mech. Eng. 11(4), 129-198.
25. Clough, R. W. and Johnston, S. B. [1966] Effect of stiffness degradation on earthquake ductility requirements, in Proc. Japan Earthq. Eng. Symp., pp. 227-232.
26. Cofer, W. F., Zhang, Y. and McLean, D. I. [2002] A comparison of current computer analysis methods for seismic performance of reinforced concrete members, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 38(9), 835-861.
27. Coleman, J. and Spacone, E. [2001] Localization issues in force-based frame elements, J. Struct. Eng. 127(11), 1257-1265.
28. Conte, J. P., Barbato, M. and Spacone, E. [2004] Finite element response sensitivity analysis using force-based frame models, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 59(13), 1781-1820.
29. Cornell, C. A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R. O. and Foutch, D. A. [2002] Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines, J. Struct. Eng. 129(4), 526-533.
30. Crisfield, M. A. [1980] Fast incremental/iterative solution procedure that handles "snap-through," Comput. Struct. 13(1-3), 55-62.
31. Darvall, L. P. and Mendis, P. [1985] Elastic-plastic-softening analysis of plane frames, J. Struct. Eng. 11(4), 8871-888.
32. Der Kiureghian, A. [1996] Structural reliability methods for seismic safety assessment: A review, Eng. Struct. 18(6), 412-424.
33. Dides, M. A. and de la Llera, J. C. [2005] A comparative study of concentrated plasticity models in dynamic analysis of building structures, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34(8), 1005-1026.
34. EC2 [2000] Eurocode 2. Design of Concrete Structures. Part 1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings (European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium).
35. EC3 [1993] Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures. Part 1.1: General Rules for Buildings (European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium).
36. EC8 [2003] Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance (European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium), draft No. 6 edition.
37. El-Tawil, S. and Deierlein, G. G. [1998] Stress-resultant plasticity for frame structures, J. Eng. Mech. 124(12), 1360-1370.
38. Fafitis, A. [2001] Interaction surfaces of reinforced-concrete sections in biaxial bending, J. Struct. Eng. 127(7), 840-846.
39. Felippa, C. [2000] Stat. J. 126(12), 1224-1231.
40. FEMA-350 [2000] Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings (Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC).
41. FEMA-356 [2000] Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC).
42. Filippou, F. C. and Fenves, G. L. [2004] Methods of analysis for earthquake-resistant structures, in Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology to Performance-Based Engineering.
43. Fragiadakis, M., Vamvatsikos, D. and Papadrakakis, M. [2006] Evaluation of the influence of vertical irregularities on the seismic performance of a nine-storey steel frame, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 12), 1489-1509.
44. Fragiadakis, M., Ioannidou, D. and Papadrakakis, M. [2007] Assessment of nonlinear static analysis procedures in the framework of performance-based design, in 8th Nat. Cong. Mechanics (HSTAM2007) (Patras, Greece, June 12-17, 2007).
45. Fragiadakis, M., Papachristidis, A. and Papadrakakis, M. [2008] Seismic assessment of frame structures with a beam-column element based on the natural mode method, in Proc. 6th Int. Cong. Computational Mechanics (GRACM 08) (Thessaloniki, Greece).
46. Gasparini, D. A. and Vanmarcke, E. H. [1976] Simulated earthquake motions compatible with prescribed response spectra. Technical report, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
47. Giberson, M. F. [1967] The response of nonlinear multi-storey structures subjected to earthquake excitation (Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory).
48. Hall, J. F. [2006] Problems encountered with the use (or misuse) of Rayleigh damping, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35(5), 525-545.
49. Hamburger, R. O., Foutch, D. A. and Cornell, C. A. [2003] Translating research to practice: FEMA/SAC performance-based design procedures, Earthq. Spectra 19(2), 255-267.
50. Haukaas, T. and Der Kiureghian, A. [2004] Finite element reliability and sensitivity methods for performance-based engineering. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, California; Research Report UCB/EERC-2003/14.
51. Haukaas, T. and Scott, M. H. [2006] Shape sensitivities in the reliability analysis of nonlinear frame structures, Comput. Struct. 84(15-16), 964-977.
52. Hellesland, J. and Scordelis, A. [1981] Analysis of RC bridge columns under imposed deformations, in IABSE Colloquium (Delft, Netherlands), pp. 545-559.
53. Hilber, H., Hughes, T. J. R. and Taylor, R. L. T. [1977] Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 5, 283-292.
54. Hilmy, S. I. and Abel, J. F. [1985] Strain-hardening concentrated plasticity model for nonlinear dynamic analysis of steel buildings. Pages 305-314.
55. Ibarra, L. F., Medina, R. A. and Krawinkler, H. [2005] Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34(12), 1489-1511.
56. IBC [2000] International Building Code (IBC) (International Code Council, Falls Church, VA, USA).
57. Iwan, W. [1978] Application of nonlinear analysis techniques.
58. Izzuddin, B. A., Siyam A. A. F. M. and Smith, D. L. [2002] An efficient beam-column formulation for 3D reinforced concrete frames, Comput. Struct. 80(7-8), 659-676.
59. Kaba, S. and Mahin, S. A. [1984] Re.ned modeling of reinforced concrete columns for seismic analysis, in Refined Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Columns for Seismic Analysis.
60. Klinkel, S. and Govindjee, S. [2002] Using finite strain 3D material models in beam and shell elements, Eng. Comput. 19(7-8), 902-921.
61. Krawinkler, H. and Miranda, E. [2004] Performance-based earthquake engineering, in Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology to Performance-Based Engineering.
62. Krawinkler, H. and Seneviratna, G. D. P. K. [1998] Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation, Eng. Struct. 20(4-6), 452-464.
63. Lagaros, N. D. and Fragiadakis, M. [2007] Fragility assessment of steel frames using neural networks, Earthq. Spectra 23(4), 735-752.
64. Lagaros, N. D., Fragiadakis, M., Papadrakakis, M. and Tsompanakis, Y. [2006] Structural optimization: A tool for evaluating seismic design procedures, Eng. Struct. 28, 1623-1633.
65. Lai, S.-S., Will, G. T. and Otani, S. [1984] Model for inelastic biaxial bending of concrete members, J. Struct. Eng. 110(11), 2563-2584.
66. Lam, S. S. E., Wu, B., Wong, Y. L., Wang, Z. Y., Liu, Z. Q. and Li, C. S. [2003] Drift capacity of rectangular reinforced concrete columns with low lateral confinement and high-axial load, J. Struct. Eng. 129(6), 733-742.
67. Li, W., Assimaki, D. and Fragiadakis, M. [2008] Site response modeling uncertainty in "rupture-to-rafters" ground motion simulations, in 14th World Conf. Earthquake Engineering (14WCEE) (Beijing, China; Oct. 12-17, 2008).
68. Liu, P. C., Archuleta, R. J. and Hartzell, S. H. [2007] Prediction of broadband ground-motion time histories: Hybrid low/high-frequency method with correlated random source parameters, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, 2118-2130.
69. Luco, N. and Bazzurro, P. [2007] Does amplitude scaling of ground motion records result in biased nonlinear structural drift responses? Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36(13), 1813-1835.
70. Mahasuverachai, M. and Powell, G. H. [1982] Inelastic analysis of piping and tubular structures, in Inelastic Analysis of Piping and Tubular Structures.
71. Mari, A. and Scordelis, A. [1984] Nonlinear geometric material and time-dependent analysis of three-dimensional reinforced and prestressed concrete frames. Research report: SESM Report 82/12.
72. Marini, A. and Spacone, E. [2006] Analysis of reinforced concrete elements including shear effects, ACI Struct. J. 103(5), 645-655.
73. Matthies, H. and Strang, G. [1979] Solution of nonlinear finite element equations, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 14(11), 1613-1626.
74. McGuire, W., Gallagher, R. H. and Ziemian, R. D. [2000] Matrix Structural Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, New York).
75. McKenna, F. and Fenves, G. L. [2001] The OpenSees Command Language Manual, edn. 1.2.
76. Melchers, R. E. [2002] Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction (John Wiley).
77. Meyer, C., Roufailel, M. S. and Arzoumanidis, S. G. [1983] Analysis of damaged concrete frames for cyclic loads, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 11, 207-228.
78. Navarro, G. J., Miguel, S. P., Fernandez, P. M. A. and Filippou, F. C. [2007] A 3D numerical model for reinforced and prestressed concrete elements subjected to combined axial, bending, shear and torsion loading, Eng. Struct. 29(12), 3404-3419.
79. Neuenhofer, A. and Filippou, F. C. [1997] Evaluation of nonlinear frame finite-element models, J. Struct. Eng. 123(7), 958-966.
80. Nie, J. and Ellingwood, B. R. [2004] A new directional simulation method for system reliability. Part II: Application of neural networks, Prob. Eng. Mech. 19(4), 437-447.
81. Owen, D. R. J. and Hinton, E. [1980] Finite Elements in Plasticity: Theory and Practice (Pineridge, Swansea).
82. Ozdemir, H. [1976] Nonlinear Transient Dynamic Analysis of Yielding Structures. PhD thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University.
83. Panagiotakos, T. B. and Fardis, M. N. [2001] Deformations of reinforced concrete members at yielding and ultimate, ACI Struct. J. 98 2), 135-148.
84. Papadrakakis, M. [1981] Method for the automatic evaluation of the dynamic relaxation parameters, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 25(1), 35-48.
85. Papadrakakis, M., Papadopoulos, V. and Lagaros, N. D. [1996] Structural reliability analyis of elastic-plastic structures using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 136 1-2), 145-163.
86. Papaioannou, I., Fragiadakis, M. and Papadrakakis, M. [2005] Inelastic analysis of framed structures using the fiber approach, in Proc. 5th Int. Cong. Computational Mechanics (GRACM 05) (Limasol, Cyprus, 2005 ).
87. Park, Y. J. and Ang, A. H.-S. [1985] Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete, J. Struct. Eng. 111, 722-739.
88. Perus, I., Poljansek, K. and Fajfar, P. [2006] Flexural deformation capacity of rectangular RC columns determined by the CAE method, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35(12), 1453-1470.
89. Petrangeli, M., Pinto, P. E. and Ciampi, V. [1999] Fibre element for cyclic bending and shear of RC structures. I: Theory, J. Eng. Mech. 125(9), 1001.
90. Pinto, P. E. [2001] Reliability methods in earthquake engineering, Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater. 3, 76-85.
91. Pinto, P. E., Giannini, R. and Franchin, P. [2004] Seismic Reliability Analysis of Structures (IUSS, Pavia).
92. Porter, K. A., Beck, J. L. and Shaikhutdinov, R. V. [2002] Sensitivity of building loss estimates to major uncertain variables, Earthq. Spectra 18(4), 719-743.
93. Powell, G. H. and Chen, P. F. [1986] 3D beam-column element with generalized plastic hinges, J. Eng. Mech. 112(7), 627-641.
94. Rasheed, H. A. S. and Dinno, K. S. [1994] Efficient nonlinear analysis of RC sections, Comput. Struct. 53(3), 613-623.
95. Rotter, J. M. [1985] Rapid exact inelastic biaxial bending analysis, J. Struct. Div. 111, 2659-2674.
96. Saje, M., Planinc, I., Turk, G. and Vratanar, B. [1997] A kinematically exact finite element formulation of planar elastic-plastic frames, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 144(1-2), 125-151.
97. Saritas, A. and Filippou, F. C. [2004] Modeling of shear yielding members for seismic energy dissipation, in Proc. 13th World Conf. Earthquake Engineering (Vancouver, BC, Canada).
98. Schuëller, G. I. [2007] On the treatment of uncertainties in structural mechanics and analysis, Comput. Struct. 85(5-6), 235-243.
99. Scott, M. H. and Fenves, G. L. [2006] Plastic hinge integration methods for force-based beam-column elements, J. Struct. Eng. 132 2), 244-252.
100. Scott, M. H., Franchin, P., Fenves, G. L. and Filippou, F. C. [2004] Response sensitivity for nonlinear beam-column elements, J. Struct. Eng. 130(9), 1281-1288.
101. Shome, N., Cornell, C. A., Bazzurro, P. and Carballo, J. E. [1998] Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses, Earthq. Spectra 14(3), 469-500.
102. Sivaselvan, M. V. and Reinhorn, A. M. [2000] Hysteretic models for deteriorating inelastic structures, J. Eng. Mech. 126(6), 633-640.
103. Soleimani, D., Popov, E. P. and Bertero, V. V. [1979] Nonlinear beam model for R/C frame analysis, in 7th ASCE Conf. Electronic Computations, (St. Louis, 1979).
104. Song, J. and Pincheira, J. A. [2000] Spectral displacement demands of stiffness- and strength-degrading systems, Earthq. Spectra 16 4), 817-851.
105. Spacone, E., Filippou, F. C. and Taucer, F. F. [1996] Fibre beam-column model for nonlinear analysis of R/C frames. Part I: Formulation, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 25(7), 711-725.
106. Spiliopoulos, K. V. and Lykidis, G. Ch. [2006] An efficient three-dimensional solid finite element dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete structures, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35(2), 137-157.
107. Takayanagi, T. and Schnobrich, W. [1979] Non-linear analysis of coupled wall systems, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 7, 1-22.
108. Takeda, T., Sozen, M. A. and Nielsen, N. N. [1970] Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes, J. Struct. Div. 96(12), 2557-2573.
109. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C. A. [2005] Direct estimation of seismic demand and capacity of multi-degree-of-freedom systems through incremental dynamic analysis of single degree of freedom approximation, J. Struct. Eng. 131(4), 589-599.
110. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C. A. [2002] Incremental dynamic analysis, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31(3), 491-514.
111. Vecchio, F. J. and Collins, M. P. [1988] Predicting the response of reinforced concrete beams subjected to shear using the modified compression field theory, ACI Struct. J. 85(3), 258-268.
112. SEAOC Vision 2000 [1995] Performance-Based Structural Engineering (Structural Engineers Association of California).
113. Wen, Y. K. [1976] Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems, ASCE J. Eng. Mech. Div. 102(2), 249-263.
114. Wen, Y. K. [2001] Reliability and performance-based design, Struct. Safety 23(4), 407-428.
115. Wen, Y. K., Ellingwood, B. R., Veneziano, D. and Bracci, J. [2003] Uncertainty modeling in earthquake engineering, Report FD-2, Mid-America Earthquake Center.
116. Wilson, E. L. and Habibullah, A. [1987] Static and dynamic analysis of multi-storey including p-delta effects, Earthq. Spectra 3 2), 289-298.
117. Yu, W., Volovoi, V. V., Hodges, D. H. and Hong, X. [2002] Validation of the variational asymptotic beam sectional analysis, AIAA J. 40 10), 2105-2112.
118. Zeris, A. and Mahin, S. A. [1988] Analysis of reinforced concrete beam-columns under uniaxial excitation, J. Struct. Eng. 114 4), 804-820.
119. Zhang, Y. and Der Kiureghian, A. [1994] First-excursion probability of uncertain structures, Prob. Eng. Mech. 9(1-2), 135-143.
120. Zienkiewicz, O. C., Taylor, R. L. and Zhu, J. Z. [2006] The Finite Element Method (Elsevier).