Shape sensitivities in the reliability analysis of nonlinear frame structures

Computers and Structures

Volumn 84, Issue 15-16, 2006, Pages 964-977

  Haukaas, Terje ^a   Scott, Michael H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Beam columns; Direct differentiation method; Geometrical imperfections; Nonlinear analysis; OpenSees; Shape sensitivity; Structural reliability

Indexed keywords

BEAMS AND GIRDERS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; RELIABILITY; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

BEAM-COLUMNS; DIRECT DIFFERENTIATION METHOD; GEOMETRICAL IMPERFECTIONS; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; OPENSEES; SHAPE SENSITIVITY; STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY;

STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

EID: 33646343707     PISSN: 00457949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.02.014     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bjerager P., and Krenk S. Parameter sensitivity in first order reliability theory. J Eng Mech 115 7 (1989) 1577-1582
2. Choi K.K., and Santos J.L.T. Design sensitivity analysis of non-linear structural systems, Part I: Theory. Int J Numer Meth Eng 24 (1987) 2039-2055
3. Conte JP, Vijalapura PK, Meghella M. Consistent finite element sensitivity in seismic reliability analysis. In: Proceedings of 13th ASCE engineering mechanics division conference, Baltimore, MD. The Johns Hopkins University; 1999.
4. Filippou F.C., and Fenves G.L. Methods of analysis for earthquake-resistant structures. In: Bozorgnia Y., and Bertero V.V. (Eds). Earthquake engineering: from engineering seismology to performance-based engineering (2004), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL [chapter 6]
5. Franchin P. Reliability of uncertain inelastic structures under earthquake excitation. J Eng Mech 130 2 (2004) 180-191
6. Hamburger R, Rojahn C, Moehle J, Bachman R, Comartin C, Whittaker A. The atc-58 project: development of next-generation performance-based earthquake engineering decision criteria for buildings. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering (13th WCEE), Vancouver, Canada; 2004.
7. Haukaas T, Der Kiureghian A. Developments in finite element reliability and sensitivity analysis of nonlinear structures. In: Der Kiureghian A, Madanat S, Pestana J, editors. Proceedings of the ninth international conference on applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering, ICASP9, San Francisco, California; 2003.
8. Haukaas T, Der Kiureghian A. Finite element reliability and sensitivity methods for performance-based engineering. Report No. PEER 2003/14, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA; 2004.
9. Haukaas T., and Der Kiureghian A. Parameter sensitivity and importance measures in nonlinear finite element reliability analysis. J Eng Mech 131 10 (2005) 102
10. Hohenbichler M., and Rackwitz R. Non-normal dependent vectors in structural safety. J Eng Mech 107 6 (1981) 1227-1238
11. Hohenbichler M., and Rackwitz R. Sensitivity and importance measures in structural reliability. Civil Eng Syst 3 (1986) 203-209
12. Hughes T.J.R. The finite element method: linear static and dynamic finite element analysis (1987), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
13. Kleiber M., Antunez H., Hien T., and Kowalczyk P. Parameter sensitivity in nonlinear mechanics (1997), John Wiley and Sons Ltd., West Sussex, UK
14. Liu P.-L., and Der Kiureghian A. Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances. Probabilist Eng Mech 1 2 (1986) 105-112
15. Liu P.-L., and Der Kiureghian A. Finite element reliability of geometrically nonlinear uncertain structures. J Eng Mech 17 8 (1991) 1806-1825
16. McKenna F, Fenves GL, Scott MH. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA; 2003. Available from http://opensees.berkeley.edu/.
17. Moehle J, Deierlein GG. A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering (13th WCEE), Vancouver, Canada; 2004.
18. Neuenhofer A., and Filippou F.C. Evaluation of nonlinear frame finite-element models. J Struct Eng 123 7 (1997) 958-966
19. Rosenblatt M. Remarks on a multivariate transformation. Ann Math Stat 23 (1952) 470-472
20. Roth C, Grigoriu M. Sensitivity analysis of dynamic systems subjected to seismic loads. Report No. MCEER-01-0003, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; 2001.
21. Scott B.D., Park R., and Priestley M.J.N. Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates. ACI J. 79 1 (1982)
22. Scott M.H., Franchin P., Fenves G.L., and Filippou F.C. Response sensitivity for nonlinear beam-column elements. ASCE J Struct Eng 130 9 (2004) 1281-1288
23. Spacone E., Ciampi V., and Filippou F.C. Mixed formulation of nonlinear beam finite element. Comput Struct 58 (1996) 7183
24. Tsay J.J., and Arora J.S. Nonlinear structural design sensitivity analysis for path dependent problems. Part 1: General theory. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 81 (1990) 183-208
25. Zhang Y., and Der Kiureghian A. Dynamic response sensitivity of inelastic structures. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 108 (1993) 23-36
26. Zienkiewicz O., and Taylor R. The finite element method. 5th ed. (2000), Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, Boston