Fragility assessment of steel frames using neural networks

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 735-752

  Lagaros, Nikolaos D ^a   Fragiadakis, Michalis ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NEURAL NETWORKS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STEEL STRUCTURES; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

FRAGILITY ASSESSMENT; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC DEMAND;

STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; GROUND MOTION; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STEEL STRUCTURE; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 36849047741     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.2798241     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bazzurro, R, and Luco, N., 2006. Damage potential of near-source ground motion records, 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, April 18-22, San Francisco, California.
2. Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A., 1970. Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York.
3. Conte, J. P., Pandit, H., Stewart, J. P., and Wallace, J., 2003. Ground motion intensity measure for performance-based earthquake engineering, in Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, San Francisco, California.
4. Cordova, P. P., Deirlein, G. G., Mehanny, S. S., and Cornell, C. A., 2000. Development of a two-parameter seismic intensity measure and probabilistic assessment procedure, in Proceedings of the 2nd US. -Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering of Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, Saporo, Japan.
5. Cornell, C. A., Jalayer, E, Hamburger, R. O., and Foutch, D. A., 2002. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines, J. Struct. Eng. 129, 526-533.
6. FEMA-National Institute of Building Sciences, 2003. HAZUS-MH MR1, Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology Earthquake Model, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC.
7. Fragiadakis, M., Vamvatsikos, D., and Papadrakakis, M., 2006. Evaluation of the influence of vertical irregularities on the seismic performance of a 9-storey steel frame, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35, 1489-1509.
8. Giovenale, P., Cornell, C. A., and Esteva, L., 2004. Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural response, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 33, 951-979.
9. Hurtado, J. E., 2001. Neural network in stochastic mechanics, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 8, 303-342.
10. Kramer, S. L., 1996. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
11. Lagaros, N. D., and Papadrakakis, M., 2004. Improving the condition of the Jacobian in neural network training, Adv. Eng. Software 35, 9-25.
12. Luco, N., Manuel, L., Baldava, S., and Bazzurro, P., 2005. Correlation of damage of steel moment-resisting frames to a vector-valued set of ground motion parameters, in Proceedings of the 9th ICOSSAR, Rome, Italy.
13. Luco, N., Mori, Y., Funahashi, Y., Cornell, C. A., and Nakashima, M., 2003. Evaluation of predictors of non-linear seismic demands using 'fishbone' models of SMRF buildings, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32, 2267-2288.
14. Martinez, W. L., and Martinez, A. R., 2002. Computational Statistics Handbook with MATLAB, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida.
15. McKenna, E, and Fenves, G. L., 2001. The OpenSees Command Language Manual-Version 1.2, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, University of California, Berkeley.
16. Nie, J., and Ellingwood, B. R., 2004. A new directional simulation method for system reliability, part II: application of neural networks, Probab. Eng. Mech. 19, 437-447.
17. Olsson, A., Sandberg, G., and Dahlblom, O., 2003. On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis, Struct. Safety 25, 47-68.
18. Paolucci, R., Colli, P., and Giacinto, G., 2000. Assessment of seismic site effects in 2-D alluvial valleys using neural networks, Earthquake Spectra 16, 661-680.
19. Papadrakakis, M., Papadopoulos, V., and Lagaros, N. D., 1996. Structural reliability analysis 01 elastic-plastic structures using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 136, 145-163.
20. Riedmiller, M., and Braun, H., 1993. A direct adaptive method for faster back-propagation learning: the RPROP algorithm, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, San Francisco, California, pp. 586-591.
21. Shinozuka, M., and Deodatis, G., 1997. Simulation techniques, section 1. 1, in Special Issue or, a State-of-the-Art Report on Computational Stochastic Mechanics, edited by G. I. Schueller Probab. Eng. Mech. 12, 197-321.
22. Shome, N., and Cornell, C. A., 1999. Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Non-Lineal Structures, Report No. RMS-35, RMS Program, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
23. Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C. A., 2005. Developing efficient scalar and vector intensity measures for IDA capacity estimation by incorporating elastic spectral shape information, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34, 1573-1600.
24. Wen, Y. K., and Ellingwood, B. R., 2005. The role of fragility assessment in consequence-based engineering, Earthquake Spectra 21, 861-877.
25. Wen, Y. K., Ellingwood, B. R., Veneziano, D., and Bracci, J., 2003. Uncertainty Modeling in Earthquake Engineering, Report FD-2, Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, available at: http://mae.ce.uiuc.edu.