Prediction of broadband ground-motion time histories: Hybrid low/high-frequency method with correlated random source parameters

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 96, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 2118-2130

  Liu, Pengcheng ^a   Archuleta, Ralph J ^a   Hartzell, Stephen H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b DENVER FEDERAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKES; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; RANDOM PROCESSES; SEISMIC WAVES; TECTONICS; VELOCITY;

DYNAMIC FAULT MODELING; FREQUENCY-WAVENUMBER METHOD; GROUND MOTION; RANDOM DISTRIBUTION;

SEISMOLOGY;

AMPLITUDE; DATA SET; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; FAULT SLIP; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; GROUND MOTION; NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE 1994; SEISMIC ATTENUATION; SEISMIC HAZARD; STRONG MOTION;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; NORTHRIDGE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33846093817     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120060036     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abrahamson, N., P. Somerville, and C. Cornell (1990). Uncertainty in numerical strong motion predictions, in Proc. of the Fourth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 1, 407-416.
2. Andrews, D. (1976). Rupture propagation with finite stress in antiplane strain, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 3575-3582.
3. Archuleta, R. J., P-C Liu, J. H. Steidl, L. F. Bonilla, D. Lavallé, and F. Heuze (2003). Finite-fault site-specific acceleration time histories that include nonlinear soil response, Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 137, 153-181, doi 10.1016/S0031-9201(03)00013-X.
4. Bonilla, L., D. Lavallée, and R. Archuleta (1998). Nonlinear site response: Laboratory modeling as a constraint for modeling accelerograms, in Proc. The Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, Yokohama, Japan, Vol. 2, 793-800.
5. Brune, J. N. (1970). Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 5002.
6. Cario, M. C., and B. L. Nelson (1997). Modeling and generation random vectors with arbitrary marginal distributions and correlation matrix, Technical Report, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
7. Collino, R., and C. Tsogka (2001). Application of the PML absorbing layer model to the linear elastodynamic problem in anisotropic heterogeneous media, Geophysics 66, 294-307.
8. Day, S. M. (1982). Three-dimensional simulation of spontaneous rupture: the effect of nonuniform prestress, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 72, 1881-1902.
9. Day, S. M., and C. R. Bradley (2001). Memory efficient simulation of anelastic wave propagation, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 91, 520-531.
10. Electric Power Research Institute (EERI) (1993). Guidelines for determine design basis ground motions, Electric Power Research Institute Technique Report EPRI TR-102293.
11. Field, E. H., H. A. Seligson, N. Gupta, V. Gupta, T. H. Jordan, and K. W. Campbell (2005). Loss estimates for a Puente Hills blind-thrust earthquake in Los Angeles, California, Earthquake Spectra 21, 329-338.
12. Geller, R. J. (1976). Scaling relations for earthquake source parameters and magnitudes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 66, 1501-1523.
13. Graves, R., and A. Pitarka (2004). Broadband time history simulation using a hybrid approach, in 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, British Columbia, 1-6 August 2004.
14. Guatteri, M., P. Mai, and G. Beroza (2004). A pseudo-dynamic approximation to dynamic rupture models for strong ground motion prediction, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 94, 2051-2063.
15. Guatteri, M., P. Mai, G. Beroza, and J. Boatwright (2003). Strong ground-motion prediction from stochastic-dynamic source models, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93, 301-313.
16. Hall, J., T. Heaton, M. Halling, and D. Wald (1995). Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings, Earthquake Spectra 11, 569-605.
17. Hartzell, S., and H. Heaton (1995). San Andreas deterministic fault problem: Green's function summation for a finite source, in Proceedings: Modeling Earthquake Ground Motion at Close Distances, EPRI TR-104975, 7-1-7-21.
18. Hartzell, S., L. F. Bonilla, and R. A. Williams (2004). Prediction of non-linear soil effects, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 94, 1609-1629.
19. Hartzell, S., S. Harmsen, A. Frankel, and S. Larsen (1999). Calculation of broadband time histories of ground motion: comparison of methods and validation using strong-ground motion from the 1994 Northridge earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89, 1484-1504.
20. Hartzell, S., S. Harmsen, R. A. Williams, D. Carver, A. Frankel, G. Choy, P.-C. Liu, R. C. Jachens, T. M. Brocher, and C. M. Wentworth (2006). Modeling and validation of a 3D velocity structure for the Santa Clara Valley, California, for seismic wave simulations, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, 1851-1881.
21. Hartzell, S., A. Leeds, A. Frankel, R. Williams, J. Odum, W. Stephenson, and W. Silva (2002). Simulation of broadband ground motion including nonlinear soil effects for a magnitude 6.5 earthquake on the Seattle fault, Seattle, Washington, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 831-853.
22. Hartzell, S., P-C Liu, and C. Mendoza (1996). The 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake: investigation of rupture velocity, rise time and high-frequency radiation, J. Geophys. Res. 101, 20,091-20,108.
23. Hartzell, S., G. Mariagiovanna, P. M. Mai, P-C Liu, and M. Fisk (2005). Calculation of broadband time histories of ground motion, Part II: Kinematic and dynamic modeling using theoretical Green's functions and comparison with the 1994 Northridge earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 95, 614-645.
24. Herrero, A., and P. Bernard (1994). A kinematic self-similar rupture process for earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, 1216-1228.
25. Iwan, W. D. (1967). On a class of models for the yielding behavior of continuous and composite systems, J. Appl. Mech. 34, 612-617.
26. Kamae, K., K. Irikura, and A. Pitarka (1998). A technique for simulating strong ground motions from great earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 88, 357-367.
27. Lavallée, D., and R. Archuleta (2003). Stochastic modeling of slip spatial complexities for the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1245, doi 10.1029/2002GL015839.
28. Lavallée, D., P. Liu, and R. J. Archuleta (2006). Stochastic model of heterogeneity in earthquake slip spatial distributions, Geophys. J. Int. 165, 622-640.
29. Liu, P-C, and R. J. Archuleta (2002). The effect of a low-velocity surface layer on simulated ground motion, Seism. Res. Lett. 73, 267.
30. Liu, P-C, and R. J. Archuleta (2006). Efficient modeling of Q for 3D numerical simulation of wave propagation, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. (in press).
31. Magistrale, H., S. Day, R. W. Clayton, and R. Graves (2000). The SCEC southern California reference three-dimensional seismic velocity model Version 2, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 90, S65-S76.
32. Mai, P. M., and G. C. Beroza (2002). A spatial random field model to characterize complexity in earthquake slip, J. Geophys. Res. 107, 1-21.
33. Marcinkovich, C., and K. Olsen (2003). On the implementation of perfectly matched layers in a three-dimensional fourth-order velocity-stress finite difference scheme, J. Geophys. Res. 108, doi 10.1029/2002JB002235.
34. Masing, G. (1926). Eigenspannungen and verfestigung beim messing, in Proceeding of 2nd International Congress of Applied Mechanics, Zurich, Switzerland, 332-335.
35. Oglesby, D. D., and S. M. Day (2002) Stochastic faulting stress: implications for fault dynamics and ground motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 3006-3021.
36. Ogorodnikov, V. A., and S. M. Prigarin (1996). Numerical Modeling of Random Processes and Fields: Algorithms and Applications, VSP, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
37. Pitarka, A., P. Somerville, Y. Fukushima, T. Uetake, and K. Irikura (2000). Simulation of near-fault ground-motion using hybrid Green's functions, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 90, 566-586.
38. Schneider, J., W. Silva, and C. Stark (1993). Ground motion model for the 1989 M 6.9 Loma Prieta earthquake including effects of source, path, and site, Earthquake Spectra 9, 251-287.
39. Shaw, J., A. Plesch, J. Dolan, T. Pratt, and P. Fiore (2002). Puente Hills blind-thrust system, Los Angeles, California, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 2946-2960.
40. Silva, W., R. Darragh, and N. Gregor (1998). Reassessment of site coefficients and near-fault factors for building code provisions, Pacific Engineering and Analysis Report 98-HQ-GR-1010.
41. Somerville, P., K. Irikura, R. Graves, S. Sawada, D. Wald, N. Abrahamson, Y. Iwasaki, N. Smith, and A. Kowada (1999). Characterizing crustal earthquake slip models for the prediction of strong ground motion, Seism. Res. Lett. 70, 59-80.
42. Spudich, P., and R. J. Archuleta (1987). Techniques for earthquake ground-motion calculation with applications to source parameterization of finite faults, in Seismic Strong Motion Synthetics, B. A. Bolt (Editor), Academic Press, San Diego, California, 205-265.
43. Wald, D. J., T. H. Heaton, and K. W. Hudnat (1996). The slip history of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake from strong-motion, teleseismic, GPS, and leveling data, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, S49-S70.
44. Zeng, Y. (2006). Broadband strong ground motion simulation using a composite source model, Proceedings of the 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, April 18-22, 2006, San Francisco, California, paper no. 1445.
45. Zeng, Y., and J. Anderson (2000). Earthquake source and near-field directivity modeling of several large earthquakes, in EERI Proceedings for the Sixth International Conference on Seismic Zonation.
46. Zhu, L., and L. Rivera (2001). Computation of dynamic and static displacement from a point source in multi-layered media, Geophys. J Int. 148, 619-627.