Auditory-evoked potentials to frequency increase and decrease of high- and low-frequency tones

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 120, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 360-373

  Pratt, Hillel ^a   Starr, Arnold ^b   Michalewski, Henry J ^b   Dimitrijevic, Andrew ^b   Bleich, Naomi ^a   Mittelman, Nomi ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Change complex; Event related potentials; Frequency resolution; Functional imaging; Source estimation; Spectral change

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; STIMULUS; TEMPORAL CORTEX;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; AUDITORY CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; REACTION TIME; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 59149091271     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.10.158     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Arlinger S., Elberling C., Bak C., Kofoed B., Lebech J., and Saermark K. Cortical magnetic fields evoked by frequency glides of a continuous tone. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 54 (1982) 642-653
2. Attias J., Urbach D., Gold S., and Shemesh Z. Auditory event related potentials in chronic tinnitus patients with noise induced hearing loss. Hear Res 71 (1993) 106-113
3. Bentin S., Allison T., Puce A., Perez E., and McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J Cogn Neurosci 8 (1996) 551-565
4. Brugge J.F., and Merzenich M.M. Responses of neurons in auditory cortex of macaque monkey to monaural and binaural stimulation. J Neurophysiol 36 (1973) 1138-1158
5. Carmel D., and Bentin S. Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces. Cognition 83 (2002) 1-29
6. Čeponienė R., Alku P., Westerfield M., Torkki M., and Townsend J. Event-related potentials differentiate syllable and non-phonetic correlate processing in children and adults. Psychophysiology 42 (2005) 391-406
7. Dimitrijevic A., Michalewski H.J., Zeng F.-G., Pratt H., and Starr A. Frequency changes in a continuous tone: auditory cortical potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 119 (2008) 2111-2124
8. Friesen L.M., and Trembley K.L. Acoustic change complexes recorded in adult cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear 27 (2006) 678-685
9. Fuchs M., Kastner J., Wagner M., Hawes S., and Ebersole J.S. A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model. Clin Neurophysiol 113 (2002) 702-712
10. Godey B., Schwartz D., de Graaf J.B., and Liegeois-Chauvel C. Neuromagnetic source localization of auditory evoked fields and intracranial evoked potentials: a comparison of data in he same patients. Clin Neurophysiol 112 (2001) 1850-1859
11. Goldberg J.M., and Brownell W.E. Response characteristics of neurons in anteroventral and dorsal cochlear nuclei of cat. Brain Res 64 (1973) 35-54
12. Harris K.C., Mills J.H., and Dubno J.R. Electrophysiologic correlates of intensity discrimination in cortical evoked potentials of younger and older adults. Hear Res 228 (2007) 58-68
13. Harris K.C., Mills J.H., He N.J., and Dubno J.R. Age-related differences in sensitivity to small changes in frequency assessed with cortical evoked potentials. Hear Res 243 (2008) 47-56
14. Javel E., and Mott J.B. Physiological and psychophysical correlates of temporal processes in hearing. Hear Res 34 (1988) 275-294
15. Jones S.J. Sensitivity of human auditory evoked potentials to the harmonicity of complex tones: evidence for dissociated cortical processes of spectral and periodicity analysis. Exp Brain Res 150 (2003) 506-514
16. Jones S.J., and Perez N. The auditory 'C-process': analyzing the spectral envelope of complex sounds. Clin Neurophysiol 112 (2001) 965-975
17. Jones S.J., and Perez N. The auditory C-process of spectral profile analysis. Clin Neurophysiol 113 (2002) 1558-1565
18. Jones S.J., Longe O., and Vaz Pato M. Auditory evoked potentials to abrupt pitch and timbre change of complex tones. Electrophysiological evidence of 'streaming'?. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108 (1998) 131-142
19. Kohn M., Lifshitz K., and Litchfield D. Averaged evoked potentials and frequency modulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 45 (1978) 236-243
20. Krumbholz K., Patterson R.D., Seither-Preisler A., Lammertmann C., and Lutkenhoner B. Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus. Cereb Cortex 13 (2003) 765-772
21. Laufer I., and Pratt H. The electrophysiological net response (F-complex) to spatial fusion of speech elements forming an auditory object. Clin Neurophysiol 114 (2003) 818-834
22. Laufer I., and Pratt H. Evoked potentials to auditory movement sensation in duplex perception. Clin Neurophysiol 114 (2003) 1316-1331
23. Liegeois-Chauvel C., deGraaf J.B., Laguitton V., and Chauvel P. Specialization of left auditory cortex for speech perception in man depends on temporal coding. Cereb Cortex 9 (1999) 484-496
24. Lutkenhoner B. Single-dipole analyses of the N100m are not suitable for characterizing the cortical representation of pitch. Audiol Neurootol 8 (2003) 222-233
25. Lutkenhoner B., Krumbholz K., and Seither-Preisler A. Studies of tonotopy based on wave N100 of the auditory evoked field are problematic. Neuroimage 19 (2003) 935-949
26. Martin B.A., and Boothroyd A. Cortical, auditory, event-related potentials in response to periodic and aperiodic stimuli with the same spectral envelope. Ear Hear 20 (1999) 33-44
27. Martin B.A., and Boothroyd A. Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to change of spectrum and amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am 107 (2000) 2155-2161
28. McCandless G.A., and Rose D.E. Evoked cortical responses to stimulus change. J Speech Hear Res 13 (1970) 624-634
29. Medwetzky L. Central auditory processing [Chapter 25]. In: Katz J, editor. Handbook of clinical audiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. p. 495-509.
30. Michalewski H.J., Starr A., Nguyen T.T., Kong Y.-Y., and Zeng F.-G. Auditory temporal processes in normal-hearing individuals and in patients with auditory neuropathy. Clin Neurophysiol 116 (2005) 669-680
31. Moushegian G., Rupert A.L., and Stillman R.D. Scalp-recorded early responses in man to frequencies in the speech range. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 35 (1973) 665-667
32. Nichols T.E., and Holmes A.P. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp 15 (2002) 1-25
33. Ostroff M.J., Martin B.A., and Boothroyd A. Cortical evoked responses to acoustic change within a syllable. Ear Hear 19 (1998) 290-297
34. Palmer A.R. Neural signal processing. In: Moore C.J. (Ed). Hearing (1995), Academic Press, San Diego
35. Palmer A.R., and Russel I.J. Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair cells. Hear Res 24 (1986) 1-15
36. Pantev C., Hoke M., Lehnertz K., Lutkenhoner B., Anogianakis G., and Wittowski W. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 69 (1988) 160-170
37. Pantev C., Bertrand O., Eulitz C., Verkindt C., Hampton S., Schuierer G., et al. Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroencephalogr clin Neurophysiol 94 (1995) 26-40
38. Pascual-Marqui R.D. Standardized low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 24D (2002) 5-12
39. Pascual-Marqui R.D., Michel C.M., and Lehmann D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int J Psychophysiol 18 (1994) 49-65
40. 1 component to gaps in noise. Clin Neurophysiol 116 (2005) 2648-2663
41. Pratt H., Starr A., Michalewski H.J., Bleich N., and Mittelman N. The N1 complex to gaps in noise: effects of preceding noise duration and intensity. Clin Neurophysiol 118 (2007) 1078-1087
42. Pratt H., Starr A., Michalewski H.J., Bleich N., and Mittelman N. The auditory P50 component to onset and offset of sound. Clin Neurophysiol 119 (2008) 376-387
43. Roberts T.P.L., and Poeppel D. Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency. NeuroReport 7 (1996) 1138-1140
44. Rose J.E., Brugge J.F., Anderson D.J., and Hind J.E. Patterns of activity of single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey. In: De Reuck A.V.S., and Knight J. (Eds). Hearing mechanisms in vertebrates (1968), Churchill, London
45. Scott L.S., Tanaka J.W., Sheinberg D.L., and Curran T. A reevaluation of the electrophysiological correlates of expert object processing. J Cogn Neurosci 18 (2006) 1453-1465
46. Sharma A., Marsh C.M., and Dorman M.F. Relationship between N1 evoked potential morphology and the perception of voicing. J Acoust Soc Am 108 (2000) 3030-3035
47. Shtyrov Y., Pihko E., and Pulvermüller F. Determinants of dominance: is language laterality explained by physical or linguistic features of speech?. Neuroimage 27 (2005) 37-47
48. Sinai A., and Pratt H. High-resolution time course of hemispheric dominance revealed by low-resolution electromagnetic tomography. Clin Neurophysiol 114 (2003) 1181-1188
49. Steinschneider M., Schroeder C.E., Arezzo J.C., and Vaughan H.G. Speech-evoked activity in primary auditory cortex: effects of voice onset time. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 92 (1994) 30-43
50. Steinschneider M., Volkoc I., Noh M., Garell P., and Howard M.T. Temporal encoding of the voice onset time phonetic parameter by field potentials recorded directly from human auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 82 (1999) 2346-2357
51. Stufflebeam S.M., Poeppel D., Rowley H.A., and Roberts T.P.L. Peri-threshold encoding of stimulus frequency and intensity in the M100 latency. NeuroReport 9 (1998) 91-94
52. Talairach J., and Tournoux P. Coplanar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain (1988), Thieme, Stuttgart
53. Tanaka J.W., Curran T., Porterfield A.L., and Collins D. Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: the N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity. J Cogn Neurosci 18 (2006) 1488-1497
54. Tervaniemi M., Just V., Koelsch S., Widmann A., and Schroger E. Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study. Exp Brain Res 161 (2005) 1-10
55. Tian B., Reser D., Durham A., Kustov A., and Rauschecker J.P. Functional specialization in rhesus monkey auditory cortex. Science 292 (2001) 290-293
56. Verkindt C., Bertrand O., Perrin F., Echallier J.-F., and Pernier J. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex: N100 topography and multiple dipole model analysis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96 (1995) 143-156
57. Whitfield I.C., and Evans E.F. Responses of auditory cortical neurons to stimuli of changing frequency. J Neurophysiol 28 (1965) 655-672
58. Yingling C.D., and Nethercut G.E. Evoked responses to frequency shifted tones: tonotopic and contextual determinants. Int J Neurosci 22 (1983) 107-118
59. Zeng F.-G., Oba S., Garde S., Sininger Y., and Starr A. Temporal and speech processing deficits in auditory neuropathy. NeuroReport 10 (1999) 3429-3435