Frequency changes in a continuous tone: Auditory cortical potentials

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 119, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 2111-2124

  Dimitrijevic, Andrew ^a   Michalewski, Henry J ^a   Zeng, Fan Gang ^a   Pratt, Hillel ^b   Starr, Arnold ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Dipole source analysis; Event related potentials; N100; Spectral temporal coding

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIPOLE; FEMALE; HEARING; HEART FUNCTION TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; LEFT HEMISPHERE; LOW FREQUENCY NOISE; MALE; NERVE CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; NERVE POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; RECORDING; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; TEMPORAL LOBE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BRAIN MAPPING; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 47749119119     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alain C., Woods D.L., and Covarrubias D. Activation of duration-sensitive auditory cortical fields in humans. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 104 (1997) 531-539
2. Arlinger S., Elberling C., Bak C., Kofoed B., Lebech J., and Saermark K. Cortical magnetic fields evoked by frequency glides of a continuous tone. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 54 (1982) 642-653
3. Crottaz-Herbette S., and Ragot R. Perception of complex sounds: N1 latency codes pitch and topography codes spectra. Clin Neurophysiol 111 (2000) 1759-1766
4. Doughty J.M., and Garner W.R. Pitch characteristics of short tones. I: Two kinds of pitch threshold. J Exp Pyschol 37 (1947) 351-365
5. Doughty J.M., and Garner W.R. Pitch characteristics of short tones. II: Pitch as a function of tonal duration. J Exp Pyschol 38 (1948) 478-494
6. Forss N., Makela J.P., McEvoy L., and Hari R. Temporal integration and oscillatory responses of the human auditory cortex revealed by evoked magnetic fields to click trains. Hear Res 68 (1993) 89-96
7. Geisler C.D., and Sinex D.G. Responses of primary auditory fibers to brief tone bursts. J Acoust Soc Am 72 (1982) 781-794
8. Grimm S., Roeber U., Trujillo-Barreto N.J., and Schroger E. Mechanisms for detecting auditory temporal and spectral deviations operate over similar time windows but are divided differently between the two hemispheres. Neuroimage 32 (2006) 275-282
9. Gutschalk A., Patterson R.D., Rupp A., Uppenkamp S., and Scherg M. Sustained magnetic fields reveal separate sites for sound level and temporal regularity in human auditory cortex. Neuroimage 15 (2002) 207-216
10. Ille N., Berg P., and Scherg M. Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies. J Clin Neurophysiol 19 (2002) 113-124
11. Jacobson G.P., Lombardi D.M., Gibbens N.D., Ahmad B.K., and Newman C.W. The effects of stimulus frequency and recording site on the amplitude and latency of multichannel cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) component N1. Ear Hear 13 (1992) 300-306
12. Jacobsen T., Schroger E., Horenkamp T., and Winkler I. Mismatch negativity to pitch change: varied stimulus proportions in controlling effects of neural refractoriness on human auditory event-related brain potentials. Neurosci Lett 344 (2003) 79-82
13. Jerger J., and Jerger S. Evoked response to intensity and frequency change. Arch Otolaryngol 91 (1970) 433-436
14. Jones S.J., Longe O., and Vaz Pato M. Auditory evoked potentials to abrupt pitch and timber change of complex tones. Electrophysiological evidence of 'steaming'?. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108 (1998) 131-142
15. Jones S.J., and Perez N. The auditory 'C-process' analyzing the spectral envelope of complex sounds. Clin Neurophysiol 112 (2001) 965-975
16. Jones S.J., and Perez N. The auditory 'C-process' of spectral profile analysis. Clin Neurophysiol 113 (2002) 1558-1565
17. Kajikawa Y., de La Mothe L., Blumell S., and Hackett T.A. A comparison of neuron response properties in areas A1 and CM of the marmoset monkey auditory cortex: tones and broadband noise. J Neurophysiol 93 (2005) 22-34
18. Kay R.H. Hearing of modulation in sounds. Physiol Rev 62 (1982) 894-975
19. Kohn M., Lifshitz K., and Litchfield D. Averaged evoked potentials and frequency modulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 45 (1978) 236-243
20. Krumbholz K., Patterson R.D., Seither-Preisler A., Lammertmann C., and Lutkenhoner B. Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus. Cereb Cortex 13 (2003) 765-772
21. Langner G. Periodicity coding in the auditory system. Hear Res 60 (1992) 115-142
22. Lavikainen J., Huotilainen M., Ilmoniemi R.J., Simola J.T., and Näätänen R. Pitch change of a continuous tone activates two distinct processes in human auditory cortex: a study with whole-head magnetometer. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96 (1995) 93-96
23. Mark H.E., and Rattay F. Frequency discrimination of single-, double-, and triple-cycle sinusoidal acoustic signals. J Acoust Soc Am 88 (1990) 560-563
24. Martin B.A., and Boothroyd A. Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am 107 (2000) 2155-2161
25. McCandless G.A., and Rose D.E. Evoked cortical responses to stimulus change. J Speech Hear Res 13 (1970) 624-634
26. Moore B.C.J. An introduction to the psychology of hearing. 5th ed. (2003), Academic Press, San Diego
27. Moore B.C. Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones. J Acoust Soc Am 54 (1973) 610-619
28. Moushegian G., Rupert A.L., and Stillman R.D. Scalp-recorded early responses in man to frequencies in the speech range. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 35 (1973) 665-667
29. Näätänen R., and Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24 (1987) 375-425
30. Näätänen R., and Picton T.W. N2 and automatic versus controlled processes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 38 (1986) 169-186
31. Novitski N., Tervaniemi M., Huotilainen M., and Näätänen R. Frequency discrimination at different frequency levels as indexed by electrophysiological and behavioral measures. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 20 (2004) 26-36
32. Onishi S., and Davis H. Effect of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked V potentials. J Acoust Soc Am 44 (1968) 582-591
33. Ostroff J.M., Martin B.A., and Boothroyd A. Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable. Ear Hear 19 (1998) 290-297
34. Palmer A.R., and Russell I.J. Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea-pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair-cells. Hear Res 24 (1986) 1-15
35. Pantev C., Bertrand O., Eulitz C., Verkindt C., Hampson S., Schuierer G., et al. Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 94 (1995) 26-40
36. Pantev C., Roberts L.E., Elbert T., Ross B., and Wienbruch C. Tonotopic organization of the sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Hear Res 101 (1996) 62-74
37. Pantev C., Hoke M., Lehnertz K., Lutkenhoner B., Anogianakis G., and Wittkowski W. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 69 (1988) 160-170
38. Phillips D.P. Factors shaping the response latencies of neurons in the cat's auditory cortex. Behav Brain Res 93 (1998) 33-41
39. Picton T.W., Woods D.L., and Proulx G.B. Human auditory sustained potentials. I: The nature of the response. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 45 (1978) 186-197
40. Roberts T.P., Ferrari P., Stufflebeam S.M., and Poeppel D. Latency of the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components: stimulus dependence and insights toward perception. J Clin Neurophysiol 17 (2000) 114-129
41. Roberts T.P., and Poeppel D. Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency. Neuroreport 7 (1996) 1138-1140
42. Rose J.E., Brugge J.F., Anderson D.J., and Hind J.E. Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey. J Neurophysiol 30 (1967) 769-793
43. Simson R., Vaughn Jr. H.G., and Ritter W. The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual discrimination tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 42 (1977) 528-535
44. Spoor A., Timmer F., and Odenthal D.W. The evoked auditory response (EAR) to intensity modulated and frequency modulated tones and tone bursts. Int Aud 8 (1969) 410-415
45. Starr A., and Hellerstein D. Distribution of frequency following responses in cat cochlear nucleus to sinusoidal acoustic signals. Brain Res 33 (1971) 367-377
46. Stufflebeam S.M., Poeppel D., Rowley H.A., and Roberts T.P. Peri-threshold encoding of stimulus frequency and intensity in the M100 latency. Neuroreport 9 (1998) 91-94
47. Suzuki Y., and Takeshima H. Equal-loudness-level contours for pure tones. J Acoust Soc Am 116 (2004) 918-933
48. Tian B., Reser D., Durham A., Kustov A., and Rauschecker J.P. Functional specialization in rhesus monkey auditory cortex. Science 292 (2001) 290-293
49. Von Bekesy G. Experiments in hearing (1960), McGraw-Hill, New York
50. Verkindt C., Bertrand O., Perrin F., Echallier J.F., and Pernier J. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex: N100 topography and multiple dipole model analysis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96 (1995) 143-156
51. Watson C.S., and Gengel R.W. Signal duration and signal frequency in relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 46 (1969) 989-997
52. Wessinger C.M., Buoncore M.H., Kussmaul C.L., and Mangun G.R. Tonotopy in human auditory cortex examined with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 5 (1997) 18-25
53. Woods D.L., Alain C., Covarrubias D., and Zaidel O. Frequency-related differences in the speed of human auditory processing. Hear Res 66 (1993) 46-52
54. Yingling C.D., and Nethercut G.E. Evoked responses to frequency shifted tones: tonotopic and contextual determinants. Int J Neurosci 22 (1983) 107-118
55. Zar J.H. Biostatistical analysis. 4th ed. (1999), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
56. Zatorre R.J., and Belin P. Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex 11 (2001) 946-953
57. Zeng F.G., Kong Y.Y., Michalewski H.J., and Starr A. Perceptual consequences of disrupted auditory nerve activity. J Neurophysiol 93 (2005) 3050-3063