Single-dipole analyses of the N100m are not suitable for characterizing the cortical representation of pitch

Audiology and Neuro-Otology

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 222-233

  Lütkenhöner, Bernd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; Auditory evoked field; Dipole model; Functional organization; Magnetoencephalography; Missing fundamental; Pitch; Tonotopy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY CORTEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIPOLE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MOLECULAR MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND;

AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PITCH PERCEPTION;

EID: 17144452870     PISSN: 14203030     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000071062     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Cansino S, Williamson SJ, Karron D: Tonotopic organization of human auditory association cortex. Brain Res 1994;663:38-50.
2. Dietrich V, Nieschalk M, Stoll W, Rajan R, Pantev C: Cortical reorganization in patients with high frequency cochlear hearing loss. Hear Res 2001;158:95-101.
3. Eggermont JJ, Ponton CW: The neurophysiology of auditory perception: From single units to evoked potentials. Audiol Neurootol 2002;7:71-99.
4. Elberling C, Bak C, Kofoed B, Lebech J, Saermark K: Auditory magnetic fields: Source location and 'tonotopical organization' in the right hemisphere of the human brain. Scand Audiol 1982;11:61-65.
5. Elbert T, Sterr A, Rockstroh B, Pantev C, Müller MM, Taub E: Expansion of the tonotopic area in the auditory cortex of the blind. J Neurosci 2002;22:9941-9944.
6. Fishman YI, Volkov IO, Noh MD, Garell PC, Bakken H, Arezzo JC, Howard MA, Steinschneider M: Consonance and dissonance of musical chords: Neural correlates in auditory cortex of monkeys and humans. J Neurophysiol 2001;86:2761-2788.
7. Hackett TA, Preuss TM, Kaas JH: Architectonic identification of the core region in auditory cortex of macaques, chimpanzees, and humans. J Comp Neurol 2001;441:197-222.
8. Hari R: The neuromagnetic method in the study of the human auditory cortex; in Grandori F, Hoke M, Romani GL (eds): Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials. Basel, Karger, 1990, vol 6, pp 222-282.
9. Howard MA, Volkov IO, Mirsky R, Garell PC, Noh MD, Granner M, Damasio H, Steinschneider M, Reale RA, Hind JE, Brugge JF: Auditory cortex on the human posterior superior temporal gyrus. J Comp Neurol 2000;416:79-92.
10. Johnsrude IS, Giraud AL, Frackowiak RS: Functional imaging of the auditory system: The use of positron emission tomography. Audiol Neurootol 2002;7:251-276.
11. Kaas JH, Hackett TA: Subdivisions of auditory cortex and levels of processing in primates. Audiol Neurootol 1998;3:73-85.
12. Kuriki S, Murase M: Neuromagnetic study of the auditory responses in right and left hemispheres of the human brain evoked by pure tones and speech sounds. Exp Brain Res 1989;77:127-134.
13. Langner G, Sams M, Heil P, Schulze H: Frequency and periodicity are represented in orthogonal maps in the human auditory cortex: Evidence from magnetoencephalography. J Comp Physiol [A] 1997;181:665-676.
14. Liégeois-Chauvel C, Musolino A, Badier JM, Marquis P, Chauvel P: Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: Evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;92:204-214.
15. Lütkenhöner B: Dipole source localization by means of maximum likelihood estimation. II. Experimental evaluation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998a;106:322-329.
16. Lütkenhöner B: Dipole separability in a neuromagnetic source analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1998b;45:572-581.
17. Lütkenhöner B, Steinsträter O: High-precision neuromagnetic study of the functional organization of the human auditory cortex. Audiol Neurootol 1998;3:191-213.
18. Lütkenhöner B, Lammertmann C, Knecht S: Latency of auditory evoked field deflection N100m ruled by pitch or spectrum? Audiol Neurootol 2001a;6:263-278.
19. Lütkenhöner B, Lammertmann C, Ross B, Steinsträter O: Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revisited: High precision neuromagnetic studies; in Breebaart DJ, Houtsma AJM, Kohlrausch A, Prijs VF, Schoonhoven R (eds): Physiological and Psychophysical Bases of Auditory Function. Maastricht, Shaker, 2001b, pp 129-136.
20. Lütkenhöner B, Krumbholz K, Lammertmann C, Seither-Preisler A, Steinsträter O, Patterson RD: Localization of primary auditory cortex in humans by magnetoencephalography. Neuroimage 2003;18:58-66.
21. McEvoy L, Levänen S, Loveless N: Temporal characteristics of auditory sensory memory: Neuromagnetic evidence. Psychophysiology 1997;34:308-316.
22. Moran JE, Tepley N, Jacobson GP, Barkley GL: Evidence for multiple generators in evoked responses using finite difference field mapping: Auditory evoked fields. Brain Topogr 1993;5:229-240.
23. Mühlnickel W, Elbert T, Taub E, Flor H: Reorganization of auditory cortex in tinnitus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:10340-10343.
24. Pantev C, Hoke M, Lehnertz K, Lütkenhöner B, Anogianakis G, Wittkowski W: Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1988;69:160-170.
25. Pantev C, Hoke M, Lütkenhöner B, Lehnertz K: Tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex: Pitch versus frequency representation. Science 1989;246:486-488.
26. Pantev C, Hoke M, Lehnertz K, Lütkenhöner B, Fahrendorf G, Stöber U: Identification of sources of brain neuronal activity with high spatiotemporal resolution through combination of neuromagnetic source localization (NMSL) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1990;75:173-184.
27. Pantev C, Gallen C, Hampson S, Buchanan S, Sobel D: Reproducibility and validity of neuromagnetic source localization using a large array biomagnetometer. Am J EEG Technol. 1991;31:83-101.
28. Pantev C, Eulitz C, Elbert T, Hoke M: The auditory evoked sustained field: Origin and frequency dependence. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;90:82-90.
29. Pantev C, Elbert T, Ross B, Eulitz C, Terhardt E: Binaural fusion and the representation of virtual pitch in the human auditory cortex. Hear Res 1996;100:164-170.
30. Roberts TP, Poeppel D: Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency. Neuroreport 1996;7:1138-1140.
31. Rogers RL, Papanicolaou AC, Baumann SB, Saydjari C, Eisenberg HM: Neuromagnetic evidence of a dynamic excitation pattern generating the N100 auditory response. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1990;77:237-240.
32. Rojas DC, Bawn SD, Carlson JP, Arciniegas DB, Teale PD, Reite ML: Alterations in tonotopy and auditory cerebral asymmetry in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2002;52:32-39.
33. Romani GL, Williamson SJ, Kaufman L: Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex. Science 1982;216:1339-1340.
34. Rosburg T, Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Ugur T, Nestmann H, Nowak H, Sauer H: Tonotopy of the auditory-evoked field component N100m in patients with schizophrenia. J Psychophysiol 2000;14:131-141.
35. Rosburg T, Haueisen J, Sauer H: Stimulus duration influences the dipole location shift within the auditory evoked field component N100m. Brain Topogr 2002;15:37-41.
36. Scherg M, Vajsar J, Picton TW: A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials. J Cogn Neurosci 1989;1:336-355.
37. Schönwiesner M, von Cramon DY, Rübsamen R: Is it tonotopy after all? Neuroimage 2002;17:1144-1161.
38. Schreiner CE: Spatial distribution of responses to simple and complex sounds in the primary auditory cortex. Audiol Neurootol 1998;3:104-122.
39. Steinschneider M, Volkov IO, Noh MD, Garell PC, Howard MA 3rd: Temporal encoding of the voice onset time phonetic parameter by field potentials recorded directly from human auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 1999;82:2346-2357.
40. Stufflebeam SM, Poeppel D, Rowley HA, Roberts TP: Peri-threshold encoding of stimulus frequency and intensity in the M100 latency. Neuroreport 1998;9:91-94.
41. Tecchio F, Bicciolo G, De Campora E, Pasqualetti P, Pizzella V, Indovina I, Cassetta E, Romani GL, Rossini PM: Tonotopic cortical changes following stapes substitution in otosclerotic patients: A magnetoencephalographic study. Hum Brain Mapp 2000;10:28-38.
42. Williamson SJ, Lu ZL, Karron D, Kaufman L: Advantages and limitations of magnetic source imaging. Brain Topogr 1991;4:169-180.
43. Wood CC, Wolpaw JR: Scalp distribution of human auditory evoked potentials. II. Evidence for overlapping sources and involvement of auditory cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982;54:25-38.
44. Zouridakis G, Simos PG, Papanicolaou AC: Multiple bilaterally asymmetric cortical sources account for the auditory N1m component. Brain Topogr 1998;10:183-189.