Acoustic change complexes recorded in adult cochlear implant listeners

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 678-685

  Friesen, Lendra M ^a   Tremblay, Kelly L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC CHANGE COMPLEX; ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE; SOUND; SOUND INTENSITY; SPEECH ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; WAVEFORM;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPEECH ACOUSTICS;

EID: 33750611348     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000240620.63453.c3     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Boothroyd, A. (2004). Measuring auditory speech perception capacity in very young children. In R. Miyamoto (Ed). Cochlear Implants: Proceedings of the 8th International Cochlear Implant Conference: International Congress Series (vol. 1273, pp. 292-295). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2. Boothroyd, A. (2005). Measuring auditory speech-perception capacity in young children. In R. Seewald (Ed). Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification (pp. 1-12). Available at: http://www.phonak.com/com_2004proceedings_aboothroyd.pdf. Accessed February 20, 2006.
3. Brill, S., Gstöttner, W., Helms, J., von Ilberg, C., Baumgartener, W., Müller, J., & Keifer, J. (1997). Optimization of channel number and stimulation rate for the fast continuous interleaved sampling strategy in the COMBI 40+. American Journal of Otology, 18(6 Suppl), S104-S106.
4. Brill, S. M., Hochmair, I., & Hochmair, E. S. (1998a). The importance of stimulation rate in pulsatile stimulation strategies in cochlear implants. Presented at the XXIV International Congress of Audiology, Buenos Aires.
5. Brill, S. M., Schatzer, R., Nopp, P., Hochmair, I., & Hochmair, E. S. (1998b). JCIS: CIS with temporally jittering stimulation pulses: effect of jittering amplitude and stimulation rate on speech understanding. Presented at the 4th European Symposium on Paediatric Cochlear Implantation, s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
6. Dubno, J. R., & Schaefer, A. B. (1992). Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 2110-2121.
7. Eggermont, J. J., Ponton, C. W., Don, M., Waring, M. D., & Kwong, B. (1997). Maturational delays in cortical evoked potentials in cochlear implant users. Acta Oto-Laryngologica., 117, 161-163.
8. Fishman, K. E., Shannon, R., & Slattery, W. H. (1997). Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 1201-1216.
9. Friesen, L. M., Shannon, R. V., Baskent, D., & Xiaosong, W. (2001). Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 1150-1163.
10. Garnham, C., O'Driscoll, M., Ramsden, R., & Saeed, S. (2002). Speech understanding in noise with a Med-El COMBI 40+ cochlear implant using reduced channel sets. Ear and Hearing, 23, 540-552.
11. Jordan, K., Schmidt, A., Plotz, K., von Specht, H., Begall, K., Roth, N., & Scheich, H. (1997). Auditory event-related potentials in post-and prelingually deaf cochlear implant recipients. American Journal of Otology, 18(6 Suppl), S116-S117.
12. Loizou, P. C., Dorman, M., & Fitzke, J. (2000). The effect of reduced dynamic range on speech understanding: implications for patients with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 21, 25-31.
13. Martin, B. A., & Boothroyd, A. (1999). Cortical, auditory, event-related potentials in response to periodic and aperiodic stimuli with the same spectral envelope. Ear and Hearing, 20, 33-44.
14. Martin, B. A., & Boothroyd, A. (2000). Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2155-2161.
15. Ostroff, J. M., Martin, B. A., & Boothroyd, A. (1998). Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable. Ear and Hearing, 19, 290-297.
16. Pantev, C., Ross, B., Fujioka, T., Trainor, L. J., Schulte, M., & Schulz, M. (2003). Music and learning-induced cortical plasticity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 999, 438-450.
17. Polen, S. B. (1984). Auditory event related potentials. Seminars in Hearing, 5, 127-141.
18. Ponton, C. W., Eggermont, J. J., Don, M., Waring, M. D., Kwong, B., Cunningham, J., & Trautwein, P. (2000). Maturation of the mismatch negativity: effects of profound deafness and cochlear implant use. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 5, 167-185.
19. Purdy, S. C., Kelly, A. S., & Thorne, P. R. (2001). Auditory evoked potentials as measures of plasticity in humans. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 6, 211-215.
20. Sharma, A., Dorman, M. F., & Spahr, A. J. (2002). Rapid development of cortical auditory evoked potentials after early cochlear implantation. Neuroreport, 13, 1365-1368.
21. Tremblay, K., McGee, T., & Kraus, N. (1998). The time course of auditory perceptual learning: neurophysiological changes during speech-sound training. Neuroreport, 9, 3557-3560.
22. Tremblay, K. L., Billings, C., Friesen, L., & Souza, P. (2006). The neural representation of amplified speech sounds. Ear and Hearing, 27, 93-103.
23. Tremblay, K. L., Friesen, M., Martin, B. A., & Wright, R. (2003). Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds. Ear and Hearing, 24, 225-232.