Computational protein design with side-chain conformational entropy

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 176-191

  Sciretti, Daniele ^a   Bruscolini, Pierpaolo ^a   Pelizzola, Alessandro ^b,c   Pretti, Marco ^b,c   Jaramillo, Alfonso ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^b POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^c ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE   (France)

^d LABORATOIRE DE BIOCHIMIE   (France)

Author keywords

Computational protein design; Protein stability; Side chain entropy

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; ONCOPROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; ENTROPY; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STOCHASTIC MODEL; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROTEIN FOLDING; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAIN;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENTROPY; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEINS; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS C-CRK; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAINS;

EID: 58949083856     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22145     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Wernisch L, Hery S, Wodak SJ. Automatic protein design with all atom force-fields by exact and heuristic optimization. J Mol Biol 2000;301:713-736.
2. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL. De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. Science 1997;278:82-87.
3. Street AG, Mayo SL. Computational protein design. Structure Fold Des 1999;7:R105-R109.
4. Koehl P, Levitt M. De novo protein design. I. In search of stability and specificity. J Mol Biol 1999;293:1161-1181.
5. Koehl P, Levitt M. De novo protein design. II. Plasticity in sequence space. J Mol Biol 1999;293:1183-1193.
6. Raha K, Wollacott AM, Italia MJ, Desjarlais J. Prediction of amino acid sequence from structure. Prot Sci 2000;9:1106-1119.
7. Kuhlman B, Baker D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:10383-10388.
8. Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, Baker D. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 2003;302:1364-1368.
9. Jaramillo A, Wernisch L, Hery S, Wodak SJ. Automatic procedures for protein design. Comb Chem and High Throughput Screen 2001;4:643-659.
10. Karplus M, Ichiye T, Petit BM. Configurational entropy of native proteins. Biophys J 1987;52:1083-1085.
11. Jaramillo A, Wodak SJ. Computational protein design is a challenge for implicit solvation models. Biophys J 2005;88:156-171.
12. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins 1999;35:133-152.
13. Berezovsky IN, Chen WW, Choi PJ, Shakhnovich EI. Entropic stabilization of proteins and its proteomic consequences. PLoS Comput Biol 2005;1:e47.
14. Jin W, Kambara O, Sasakawa H, Tamura A, Takada S. De novo design of foldable proteins with smooth folding funnel: automated negative design and experimental verification. Structure 2003;11:581-590.
15. Zhang J, Liu JS. On side-chain conformational entropy of proteins. PLoS Comput Biol 2006;2:e168.
16. Koehl P, Delarue M. Application of a self consistent mean field theory to predict protein side-chain conformations and estimate their conformational entropy. J Mol Biol 1994;239:249-275.
17. Lopez de la Paz M, Lacroix E, Ramirez-Alvarado M, Serrano L. Computer-aided design of beta-sheet peptides. J Mol Biol 2001;312:229-246.
18. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
19. Jaramillo A, Wernisch L, Hery S, Wodak SJ. Folding free energy function selects native-like protein sequences in the core but not on the surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:13554-13559.
20. Ogata K, Jaramillo A, Cohen W, Briand JP, Connan F, Choppin J, Muller S, Wodak SJ. Automatic sequence design of major histocom-patibility complex class I binding peptides impairing CD8+ T cell recognition. J Biol Chem 2003;278:1281-1290.
21. Tortosa P, Jaramillo A. Active sites by computational protein design. In: Clemente-Gallardo J, Moreno Y, Saenz-Lorenzo JF, Velazquez-Campoy A, editors. From physics to biology vol. 851. Melville, NY: AIP Conference Proceedings, 2006. pp 96-101. Proceedings of the II BIFI 2006 International Conference, Feb 8-11, Zaragoza Spain, 2006.
22. MacKerell AD, Jr, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL, Jr, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph-McCarthy D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WE, III, Roux B, Schlenkrich M, Smith JC, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 1998;102:3586-3616.
23. Nakagawa N, Peyrard M. The inherent structure landscape of a protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:5279-5284.
24. Brady GP, Sharp KA. Entropy in protein folding and in protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997;7:215-221.
25. Kikuchi R. A theory of cooperative phenomena. Phys Rev 1951;81:988-1003.
26. An G. A note on the cluster variation method. J Stat Phys 1988;52:727-734.
27. Pelizzola A. Cluster variation method in statistical physics and probabilistic graphical models. J Phys A 2005;38:R309-R339.
28. Moore GL, Maranas CD. Identifying residue-residue clashes in protein hybrids by using a second-order mean-field approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:5091-5096.
29. Yanover C, Weiss Y. Approximate inference and protein-folding. In: Becker S, Thrun S., Obermayer K, editors. Advances in neural information processing systems 15. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2003. AP08. Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS2002) Conference, December 9-14; Vancouver, Whistler, (Canada), 2002.
30. Yanover C, Weiss Y. Finding the M most probable configurations in arbitrary graphical models. In: Thrun S, Saul LK, Schölkopf B, editors. Advances in neural information processing systems 16. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004. pp 289-296. Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS2003) Conference, 2003 Dec 8-13; Vancouver, Whistler (Canada).
31. Pearl J. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inferences. San Francisco (CA): Morgan Kaufmann; 1988. 552p.
32. Yedidia JS, Freeman WT, Weiss Y. Generalized belief propagation. In: Leen TK, Dietterich TG, Tresp V, editors. Advances in neural information processing systems 13. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001. pp 689-695. Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS2000) Conference, November 27-Dec 2, Denver, Becken-ridge, USA, 2000.
33. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet 2000;16:276-277.
34. Hu X, Kuhlman B. Protein design simulations suggest that side-chain conformational entropy is not a strong determinant of amino acid environmental preferences. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 2006;62:739-748.
35. Ma B, Elkayam T, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Protein-protein interactions: structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:5772-5777.
36. FrederickKK,MarlowMS,ValentineKG,WandJ.Conformationalen-tropy in molecular recognition by proteins. Nature 2007;448:325-330.
37. Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL, Jr. Statistical and conformational analysis of the electron density of protein side chains. Proteins 2007;66:279-303.
38. Lin MS, Fawzi NL, Head-Gordon T. Hydrophobic potential of mean force as a solvation function for protein structure prediction. Structure 2007;15:727-740.