Prediction of amino acid sequence from structure

Protein Science

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 1106-1119

  Raha, Kaushik ^a   Wollacott, Andrew M ^a   Italia, Michael J ^a   Desjarlais, John R ^a,b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Chemistry   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic algorithm; Homeodomain; Multiple sequence alignment; Pfam; Profile; Protein design; RRM; SH3

Indexed keywords

HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

EID: 0033919287     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.9.6.1106     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bateman A, Birney E, Durbin R, Eddy SR, Howe KL, Sonnhammer EL. 2000. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 28:263-266.
2. Bowie JU, Reidhaar-Olson JF, Lim WA, Sauer RT. 1990. Deciphering the message in protein sequences: Tolerance to amino acid substitutions. Science 247:1306-1310.
3. Clarke ND, Kissinger CR, Desjarlais J, Gilliland GL, Pabo CO. 1994. Structural studies of the engrailed homeodomain. Protein Sci 3:1779-1787.
4. Dahiyat BI, Gordon DB, Mayo SL, 1997a. Automated design of the surface positions of protein helices. Protein Sci 6:1333-1337.
5. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL. 1997a. De novo protein design: Fully automated sequence selection. Science 278:82-87.
6. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL. 1997b. Probing the role of packing specificity in protein design. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:10172-10177.
7. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL. 1996. Protein design automation. Protein Sci 5:895-903.
8. Dahiyat BI, Sarisky CA, Mayo SL. 1997b. De novo protein design: Towards fully automated sequence selection. J Mol Biol 273:789-796.
9. Desjarlais JR, Clarke ND. 1998. Computer search algorithms in protein modification and design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 8:471-475.
10. Desjarlais JR, Handel TM. 1995. De novo design of the Hydrophobic cores of proteins. Protein Sci 4:2006-2018.
11. Desjarlais JR, Handel TM. 1999. Side-chain and backbone flexibility in protein core design. J Mol Biol 290:305-318.
12. Desmet J, De Maeyer M, Hazes B, Lasters I. 1992. The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in protein side-chain positioning. Nature 356:539-542.
13. Dunbrack RL Jr, Cohen FE. 1997. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci 6:1661-1681.
14. Durbin R, Eddy S, Krogh A, Mitchison G. 1998. Biological sequence analysis: Probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Eisenberg D, McLachlan AD. 1986. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature 319:199-203.
16. Fraenkel E, Rould MA, Chambers KA, Pabo CO. 1998. Engrailed homeodomain-DNA complex at 2.2 A resolution: A detailed view of the interface and comparison with other engrailed structures. J Mol Biol 284:351-361.
17. Goldstein RF. 1994. Efficient rotamer elimination applied to protein side-chains and related spin glasses. Biophys J 66:1335-1340.
18. Gordon DB, Marshall SA, Mayo SL. 1999. Energy functions for protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 9:509-513.
19. Gribskov M, McLachlan AD, Eisenberg D. 1987. Profile analysis: Detection of distantly related proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:4355-4338.
20. Harbury PB, Plecs JJ, Tidor B, Alber T, Kim PS. 1998. High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. Science 282:1462-1467.
21. Harbury PB, Tidor B, Kim PS. 1995. Repacking protein cores with backbone freedom: Structure prediction for coiled coils. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:8408-8412.
22. Hecht MH. 1994. De novo design of beta-sheet proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:8729-8730.
23. Hellinga HW. 1997. Rational protein design: Combining theory and experiment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:10015-10017.
24. Hellinga HW, Richards FM. 1994. Optimal sequence selection in proteins of known structure by simulated evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:5803-5807.
25. Hendsch ZS, Tidor B. 1999. Electrostatic interactions in the GCN4 leucine zipper: Substantial contributions arise from intramolecular interactions enhanced on binding. Protein Sci 8:1381-1392.
26. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. 1994. Position-based sequence weights. J Mol Biol 243:574-578.
27. Holland JH. 1992. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
28. Johnson EC, Lazar GA, Desjarlais JR, Handel TM. 1999. Solution structure and dynamics of a designed hydrophobic core variant of ubiquitin. Struct Fold Des 7:967-976.
29. Jorgensen WL, Tirado-Rives J. 1988. The OPLS potential functions for proteins. Energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J Am Chem Soc 110:1657-1666.
30. Juffer AH, Eisenhaber F, Hubbard SJ, Walther D, Argos P. 1995. Comparison of atomic solvation parametric sets: Applicability and limitations in protein folding and binding. Protein Sci 4:2499-2509. [Also Erratum, 1996. Protein Sci 5(8):1748-1749.]
31. Kissinger CR, Liu BS, Martin-Blanco E, Kornberg TB, Pabo CO. 1990. Crystal structure of an engrailed homeodomain-DNA complex at 2.8 A resolution: A framework for understanding homeodomain-DNA interactions. Cell 63:579-590.
32. Koehl P, Levitt M. 1999a. De novo protein design. I. In search of stability and specificity. J Mol Biol 293:1161-1181.
33. Koehl P, Levitt M. 1999b. De novo protein design. II. Plasticity in sequence space, J Mol Biol 293:1183-1193.
34. Kono H, Doi J. 1994. Energy minimization method using automata network for sequence and side-chain conformation prediction from given backbone geometry. Proteins 10:244-255.
35. Kono H, Nishiyama M, Tanokura M, Doi J. 1998. Designing the hydrophobic core of Thermus flavus malate dehydrogenase based on side-chain packing. Protein Eng 11:41-52.
36. Kraulis PJ. 1991. MOLSCRIPT: A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 24:946-950.
37. Lazar GA, Desjarlais JR, Handel TM. 1997. De novo design of the Hydrophobic core of ubiquitin. Protein Sci 6:1167-1178.
38. Lazar GA, Johnson EC, Desjarlais JR, Handel TM. 1999. Rotamer strain as a determinant of protein structural specificity. Protein Sci 8:2598-2610.
39. Leahy DJ, Hendrickson WA, Aukhil I, Erickson HP. 1992. Structure of a fibronectin type III domain from tenascin phased by MAD analysis of the selenomethionyl protein. Science 258:987-991.
40. Lim WA, Hodel A, Sauer RT, Richards FM. 1994. The crystal structure of a mutant protein with altered hut improved Hydrophobic core packing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:423-427.
41. Micheletti C, Seno F, Maritan A, Banavar JR. 1998. Design of proteins with Hydrophobic and polar amino acids. Proteins 32:80-87.
42. Musacchio A, Noble M, Pauptit R, Wierenga R, Saraste M. 1992. Crystal structure of a Src-homology 3 (SH3) domain. Nature 359:851-855.
43. Oubridge C, Ito N, Evans PR, Teo CH, Nagai K. 1994. Crystal structure at 1.92 A resolution of the RNA-binding domain of the U1A spliceosomal protein complexed with an RNA hairpin. Nature 372:432-438.
44. Street AG, Mayo SL. 1999. Computational protein design. Struct Fold Des 7:R105-R109.
45. Su A, Mayo SL. 1997. Coupling backbone flexibility and amino acid sequence selection in protein design. Protein Sci 6:1701-1707.
46. Weiner SJ, Kollman PA, Case DA, Singh UC, Ghio C, Alagona G, Profeta S, Weiner P. 1984. A new force field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acids and proteins. J Am Chem Soc 106:765-784.