Corrigendum to "Subject specific finite element analysis of stress shielding around a cementless femoral stem" [Clin. Biomech. 24 (2009) 196-202] (DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.11.003);Subject specific finite element analysis of stress shielding around a cementless femoral stem

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 196-202

  Pettersen, Sune H ^a,b   Wik, Tina S ^b   Skallerud, Bjørn ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Cementless; Femur; Finite element; Prosthesis; Strain gauge; Stress shielding; Subject specific; Uncemented; Validation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; PROSTHETICS; SHIELDING; STRAIN GAGES;

CEMENTLESS; FEMUR; STRESS SHIELDING; SUBJECT-SPECIFIC; UNCEMENTED; VALIDATION;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REMODELING; BONE STRESS; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 58649123104     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.06.003     Document Type: Erratum

References (41)

1. Aamodt A., Lund-Larsen J., Eine J., Andersen E., Benum P., and Husby O.S. Changes in proximal femoral strain after insertion of uncemented standard and customised femoral stems. An experimental study in human femora. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 83 (2001) 921-929
2. Baca V., Horak Z., Mikulenka P., and Dzupa V. Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analyses. Med. Eng. Phys. (2008)
3. Bayraktar H.H., Morgan E.F., Niebur G.L., Morris G.E., Wong E.K., and Keaveny T.M. Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J. Biomech. 37 (2004) 27-35
4. Bergmann G., Graichen F., and Rohlmann A. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J. Biomech. 26 (1993) 969-990
5. Bergmann G., Deuretzbacher G., Heller M., Graichen F., Rohlmann A., Strauss J., and Duda G.N. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J. Biomech. 34 (2001) 859-871
6. Bernakiewicz M., and Viceconti M. The role of parameter identification in finite element contact analyses with reference to orthopaedic biomechanics applications. J. Biomech. 35 (2002) 61-67
7. Bessho M., Ohnishi I., Matsuyama J., Matsumoto T., Imai K., and Nakamura K. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. J. Biomech (2006)
8. Bugbee W.D., Culpepper W.J., Engh Jr. C.A., and Engh Sr. C.A. Long-term clinical consequences of stress-shielding after total hip arthroplasty without cement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 79 (1997) 1007-1012
9. Completo A., Fonseca F., and Simoes J.A. Experimental validation of intact and implanted distal femur finite element models. J. Biomech. 40 (2007) 2467-2476
10. Cristofolini L., and Viceconti M. In vitro stress shielding measurements can be affected by large errors. J. Arthroplasty 14 (1999) 215-219
11. Cristofolini L., Viceconti M., Cappello A., and Toni A. Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. J. Biomech. 29 (1996) 525-535
12. Engh C.A., McGovern T.F., Bobyn J.D., and Harris W.H. A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 74 (1992) 1009-1020
13. Engh Jr. C.A., Young A.M., Engh Sr. C.A., and Hopper Jr. R.H. Clinical consequences of stress shielding after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (2003) 157-163
14. Glassman A.H., Bobyn J.D., and Tanzer M. New femoral designs: do they influence stress shielding?. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 453 (2006) 64-74
15. Harris W.H. Will stress shielding limit the longevity of cemented femoral components of total hip replacement?. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 274 (1992) 120-123
16. Helgason B., Taddei F., Palsson H., Schileo E., Cristofolini L., Viceconti M., and Brynjolfsson S. A modified method for assigning material properties to FE models of bones. Med. Eng. Phys. (2007) (online)
17. Jasty M., O'Connor D.O., Henshaw R.M., Harrigan T.P., and Harris W.H. Fit of the uncemented femoral component and the use of cement influence the strain transfer the femoral cortex. J. Orthop. Res. 12 (1994) 648-656
18. Keller T.S. Predicting the compressive mechanical-behavior of bone. J. Biomech. 27 (1994) 1159-1168
19. Kerner J., Huiskes R., van Lenthe G.H., Weinans H., Van R.B., Engh C.A., and Amis A.A. Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling. J. Biomech. 32 (1999) 695-703
20. Kessler O., Lacatusu E., Sommers M.B., Mayr E., and Bottlang M. Malrotation in total knee arthroplasty: effect on tibial cortex strain captured by laser-based strain acquisition. Clin. Biomech. 21 (2006) 603-609
21. Keyak J.H., Rossi S.A., Jones K.A., and Skinner H.B. Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. J. Biomech. 31 (1998) 125-133
22. Kroger H., Venesmaa P., Jurvelin J., Miettinen H., Suomalainen O., and Alhava E. Bone density at the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (1998) 66-74
23. Lengsfeld M., Schmitt J., Alter P., Kaminsky J., and Leppek R. Comparison of geometry-based and CT voxel-based finite element modelling and experimental validation. Med. Eng. Phys. 20 (1998) 515-522
24. McNamara B.P., Cristofolini L., Toni A., and Taylor D. Relationship between bone-prosthesis bonding and load transfer in total hip reconstruction. J. Biomech. 30 (1997) 621-630
25. Mikic B., and Carter D.R. Bone strain gage data and theoretical models of functional adaptation. J. Biomech. 28 (1995) 465-469
26. Morgan E.F., Bayraktar H.H., and Keaveny T.M. Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. J. Biomech. 36 (2003) 897-904
27. Norman T.L., Ackerman E.S., Smith T.S., Gruen T.A., Yates A.J., Blaha J.D., and Kish V.L. Cortical bone viscoelasticity and fixation strength of press-fit femoral stems: an in vitro model. J. Biomech. Eng. 128 (2006) 13-17
28. Rietbergen B.v., Huiskes R., Weinans H., Sumner D.R., Turner T.M., and Galante J.O. ESB Research Award 1992. The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems. J. Biomech. 26 (1993) 369-382
29. Rohlmann A., Mossner U., Bergmann G., and Kolbel R. Finite-element-analysis and experimental investigation in a femur with hip endoprosthesis. J. Biomech. 16 (1983) 727-742
30. Rubin P.J., Rakotomanana R.L., Leyvraz P.F., Zysset P.K., Curnier A., and Heegaard J.H. Frictional interface micromotions and anisotropic stress distribution in a femoral total hip component. J. Biomech. 26 (1993) 725-739
31. Schileo E., Taddei F., Malandrino A., Cristofolini L., and Viceconti M. Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. J. Biomech. 40 (2007) 2982-2989
32. Stauber M., Rapillard L., van Lenthe G.H., Zysset P., and Muller R. Importance of individual rods and plates in the assessment of bone quality and their contribution to bone stiffness. J. Bone Miner. Res. 21 (2006) 586-595
33. Stolk J., Verdonschot N., and Huiskes R. Hip-joint and abductor-muscle forces adequately represent in vivo loading of a cemented total hip reconstruction. J. Biomech. 34 (2001) 917-926
34. Stolk J., Verdonschot N., Cristofolini L., Toni A., and Huiskes R. Finite element and experimental models of cemented hip joint reconstructions can produce similar bone and cement strains in pre-clinical tests. J. Biomech. 35 (2002) 499-510
35. Taddei F., Schileo E., Helgason B., Cristofolini L., and Viceconti M. The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements. Med. Eng. Phys. 29 (2007) 973-979
36. Taylor W.R., Roland E., Ploeg H., Hertig D., Klabunde R., Warner M.D., Hobatho M.C., Rakotomanana L., and Clift S.E. Determination of orthotropic bone elastic constants using FEA and modal analysis. J. Biomech. 35 (2002) 767-773
37. Verhulp E., Van R.B., and Huiskes R. Comparison of micro-level and continuum-level voxel models of the proximal femur. J. Biomech. 39 (2006) 2951-2957
38. Viceconti M., Muccini R., Bernakiewicz M., Baleani M., and Cristofolini L. Large-sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone-implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration. J. Biomech. 33 (2000) 1611-1618
39. Viceconti M., Cristofolini L., Baleani M., and Toni A. Pre-clinical validation of a new partially cemented femoral prosthesis by synergetic use of numerical and experimental methods. J. Biomech. 34 (2001) 723-731
40. Wirtz D.C., Schiffers N., Pandorf T., Radermacher K., Weichert D., and Forst R. Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur. J. Biomech. 33 (2000) 1325-1330
41. Zannoni C., Mantovani R., and Viceconti M. Material properties assignment to finite element models of bone structures: a new method. Med. Eng. Phys. 20 (1998) 735-740