Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity: Clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 7-13

  Unemori, M ^a,b   Matsuya, Y ^a   Akashi, A ^a   Goto, Y ^a   Akamine, A ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NONE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cavity class; Cavity depth; Clinical survey; Dentine bonding system; Postoperative sensitivity; Pulpal protection; Resin composite restoration; Undergraduate program

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL PULP CAPPING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE;

EID: 0035228414     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00037-3     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Retief DH, Austin JC, Fatti LP. Pulpal response to phosphoric acid. Journal of Oral Pathology 1974;3:114-22.
2. Macko DJ, Rutberg M, Langeland K. Pulpal response to the application of phosphoric acid to dentine. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 1978;45:930-46.
3. Stanley HR, Going RE, Chauncey HH. Human pulpal response to acid pretreatment of dentine and to composite resin. Journal of the American Dental Association 1975;91:817-25.
4. McLean JW, Kramer IRH. Clinical and pathohistological evaluation of a sulfinic acid activated resin for use in restorative dentistry. British Dental Journal 1952;93:255-69.
5. Stanley HR, Bowen RL, Folio J. Compatibility of various materials with oral tissue. II. Journal of Dental Research 1979;58:1507-17.
6. Sockwell CL, Heymann HO. Tooth-colored restorations. The art and science of operative dentistry. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO, USA: Mosby, 1985 (pp. 267-310).
7. Fusayama T. Factors and prevention of pulp irritation by adhesive composite resin restorations. Quintessence International 1987;18:633-41.
8. Cox CF, Suzuki S. Re-evaluating pulp protection: calcium hydroxide liners vs. cohesive hybridization. Journal of the American Dental Association 1994;125:823-31.
9. Akimoto N, Momoi Y, Kohno A, Suzuki S, Otsuki M, Suzuki S, Cox CF. Biocompatibility of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 and Clearfil AP-X system on nonexposed and exposed primate teeth. Quintessence International 1998;29:177-88.
10. Heymann HO, Roberson TM, Sockwell CL. Direct tooth-colored restorations for classes III, IV, and V cavity preparations. The art and science of operative dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO, USA: Mosby, 1995 (pp. 534-585).
11. Stanley HR. Trashing the dental literature - misleading the general practitioners: a point of view. Journal of Dental Research 1996;75:1624-6.
12. Hume WR, Gerzina TM. Bioavailability of components of resin-based materials which are applied to teeth. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine 1996;7:172-9.
13. Hilton TJ. Cavity sealers, liners, and bases: current philosophies and indications for use. Operative Dentistry 1996;21:134-46.
14. Hanks CT, Strawn SE, Wataha JC, Craig RG. Cytotoxic effects of resin components on cultured mammalian fibroblasts. Journal of Dental Research 1991;70:1450-5.
15. Rathbun MA, Craig RG, Hanks CT. Cytotoxicity of a BIS-GMA dental composite before and after leaching in organic solvents. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 1991;25:443-57.
16. Meryon SD. An in vitro study of factors contributing to the blandness of zinc oxide-eugenol preparations in vivo. International Endodontic Journal 1988;21:79-84.
17. Matsumoto H. Some problems involved in measurement of electrical impedance of carious teeth. Journal of Dentistry 1981;9:43-52.
18. Shaffer JP. Modified sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1986;81:826-31.
19. Weiner RS, Weiner LK, Kugel G. Teaching the use of bases and liners: a survey of North American dental schools. Journal of the American Dental Association 1996;127:1640-5.
20. Hebling J, Giro EMA, Costa CAS. Human pulp response after an adhesive system application in deep cavities. Journal of Dentistry 1999;27:557-64.
21. Brännström M. Dentine and pulp in restorative dentistry. London: Wolfe Medical Publications, 1982.
22. Lundeen TF, Sturdvant JR, Sluder TB. Clinical significance of dental anatomy, histology, physiology, and occlusion. The art and science of operative dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO, USA: Mosby, 1995 (p. 23).
23. Pashley DH, Matthews WG, Zhang Y, Johnson M. Fluid shifts across human dentine in vitro in response to hydrodynamic stimuli. Archives of Oral Biology 1996;41:1065-72.
24. Bouillaguet S, Virgillito M, Wataha J, Ciucchi B, Holz J. The influence of dentine permeability on cytotoxicity of four dentine bonding systems, in vitro. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1998;25:45-51.
25. Hashieh IA, Franquin JC, Cosset A, Dejou J, Camps J. Relationship between dentine hydraulic conductance and the cytotoxicity of four dentine bonding resins in vitro. Journal of Dentistry 1998;26:473-7.
26. Fusayama A. A study on marginal closure of composite resin- dentine margins. The Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry 1986;29:177-86.
27. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. Journal of Dentistry 1997;25:355-72.
28. Christensen GJ. Preventive sensitivity in Class II composite resin restorations. Journal of the American Dental Association 1998;129:1469-70.
29. Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Feilzer AJ, Verdonscot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. Journal of Dentistry 1998;26:555-62.