The effect of visual signals on spatial decision making

Cognition

Volumn 110, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 182-197

  Danziger, Shai ^a   Rafal, Robert ^b  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Choice; Inhibition of return; Spatial cueing; Spatial decisions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STRATEGIC PLANNING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

CUES; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; VIDEO GAMES; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58649087168     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Berger A., Henik A., and Rafal R. Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134 (2005) 207-221
2. Corbetta M., Patel G., and Shulman G.L. The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron 58 3 (2008) 306-324
3. Danziger S., and Kingstone A. Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon. Perception and Psychophysics 61 (1999) 1024-1037
4. Dodd M.D., and Pratt J. The effect of previous trial type on inhibition of return. Psychological Research 71 4 (2007) 411-417
5. Easton T.A. On the normal use of reflexes. American Scientist 60 (1973) 591-599
6. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., and Wright J.H. The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 2 (1994) 317-329
7. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., and Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting of attention is contingent on attentional control setting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 (1992) 1030-1044
8. Klein R.M. Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature 334 (1988) 340-341
9. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 138-146
10. Klein R.M., and MacInnes W.J. Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science 10 (1999) 346-352
11. Lupiáñez J., Decaix C., Siéroff E., Chokron S., Milliken B., and Bartolomeo P. Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous spatial cueing: Inhibition of return at endogenously attended target locations. Experimental Brain Research 159 (2004) 447-457
12. Lupiáñez J., Milán E.G., Tornay F.J., Madrind E., and Tudela P. Does inhibition of return occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later. Perception and Psychophysics 59 (1997) 1241-1254
13. Lupianez J., and Milliken B. Inhibition of return and the attentional set for integrating versus differentiating information. Journal of General Psychology 126 (1999) 392-418
14. Lupiáñez J., Ruz M., Funes M.J., and Milliken B. The manifestation of attentional capture: Facilitation or IOR depending on task demands. Psychological Research 71 (2007) 77-91
15. Macworth J.F. Vigilance and attention (1970), Penguin, Harmondsworth
16. Maruff P., Yucel M., Danckert J., Stuart G., and Currie J. Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets. Neuropsychologia 37 (1999) 731-744
17. Müller H.J., and von Mühlenen A. Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 1591-1605
18. Pashler H., and Harris C.R. Spontaneous allocation of attention: Dominant role of uniqueness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8 4 (2001) 747-752
19. Posner M.I., and Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. In: Bouma H., and Bouwhuis D. (Eds). Attention and performance x (1984), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd., London 531-556
20. Posner M.I., Rafal R.D., Choate L.S., and Vaughan J. Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2 (1985) 211-228
21. Rafal R.D., Davies J., and Lauder J. Inhibitory tagging at fixation: Generation of 'inhibition return' without saccade inhibition. Visual Cognition 13 (2006) 308-323
22. Ro T., and Rafal R. Components of reflexive orienting to moving objects. Perception and Psychophysics 61 (1999) 826-836
23. Rozin P. The evolution of intelligence and access to the cognitive unconscious. Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology (1976) 245-280
24. Schneider W., Eschman A., and Zuccolotto A. E-prime user's guide (2002), Psychology Software Tools Inc., Pittsburgh
25. Snyder J., and Kingstone A. Inhibition of return at multiple locations and its impact on visual search. Visual Cognition 15 (2007) 238-256
26. Spalek T.M. A direct assessment of the role of expectation in inhibition of return. Psychological Science 18 (2007) 783-787
27. Takeda Y., and Yagi A. Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible. Perception and Psychophysics 62 (2000) 927-934
28. Thomas L.E., Ambinder M.S., Hsieh B., Levinthal B., Crowell J.A., Irwin D.A., et al. Fruitful visual search: Inhibition of return in a virtual foraging task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 13 5 (2006) 891-895
29. Tipper S.P., Rafal R.D., Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Starrveldt Y., Ro T., Egly R., et al. Object-based facilitation and inhibition from visual orienting in the human split-brain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 1522-1532
30. Yantis S. Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control setting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 676-681