The manifestation of attentional capture: Facilitation or IOR depending on task demands

Psychological Research

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 77-91

  Lupiáñez, Juan ^a   Ruz, María ^a   Funes, María Jesús ^a   Milliken, Bruce ^b  

^a Fac Psicol Inst Neurociencias F   (Spain)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ATTENTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 33846402041     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0037-z     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Arnott, S.R., Pratt, J., Shore D., & Alain, C. (2001). Attentional set modulates visual areas: An event-related potential study of attentional capture. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 383-395.
2. Briand, K.A., Larrison, A.L., & Sereno, A.B. (2000). Inhibition of return in manual and saccadic response systems. Perception and Psychophysics, 62(8), 1512-1524.
3. Danziger, S., & Kingstone, A. (1999). Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon. Perception and Psychophysics, 61(6), 1024-1037.
4. Dorris, M.C., Klein, R.M., Everling, S., & Munoz, D.P. (2002). Contribution of the primate superior colliculus to inhibition of return. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(8), 1256-1263.
5. Folk, C.L., Remington, R.W., & Johnston, J.C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control setting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
6. Hommel, B. (2005). Feature integration across perception and action: Event files affect response choice. Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69, this issue.
7. Hommel, B., Muesseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849-937.
8. Ivanoff, J., & Klein, R.M. (2004). Stimulus-response probability and inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(3), 542-550.
9. Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
10. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B.J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
11. Khatoon, S., Briand, K.A., & Sereno, A.B. (2002). The role of response in spatial attention: direct versus indirect stimulus-response mappings. Vision Research, 42, 2693-2708.
12. Klein, R. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
13. Lupiáñez, J., Milan, E.G., Tornay, F., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks?: Yes, it does, but later. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 1241-1254.
14. Lupiáñez, J., & Milliken, B. (1999). inhibition of return and the attentional set for integrating vs. differentiating information. Journal of General Psychology, theme issue on visual attention, part 2, 126, 392-418.
15. Lupiáñez, J., Milliken, B., Solano, C., Weaver, B., & Tipper, S.P. (2001). On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 753-773.
16. Lupiáñez, J., Tudela, P., & Rueda, Ch. (1999). Inhibitory control over orienting of attention: a review of inhibition of return. Cognitiva, 11, 23-44.
17. Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861-872.
18. Oriet, C., Stevanovski, B., & Jolicoeur, P. (2005). Feature binding and episodic retrieval in blindness for congruent stimuli: Evidence from analyses of sequential congruency. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69, this issue.
19. Posner, M.I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
20. Posner, M.I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In: Bouma, H., & Bouwhuis, D.G. (Eds.), Attention and Performance X, (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, Erlbaum.
21. Posner, M.I., Rafal, R.D., Choate, L.S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228.
22. Ruz, M., & Lupiáñez, J. (2002). A review of attentional capture: On its automaticity and sensitivity to endogenous control. Psicológica, 23(2), 283-369.
23. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro experimental laboratory: an integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 20, 206-217.
24. Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L. Peru, A., y Berlucchi, G. (1994). Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection?. Vision Research, 34, 179-189.
25. Taylor, T.L., & Klein, R.M. (1998). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 625-643.
26. Tipper, S.P., Weaver, B., Rafal, R., Starrveldt, Y., Ro, T., Egly, R., Danziger, S., & Reuter-Lorenz, P.A. (1997). Object-based facilitation and inhibition from visual orienting in the human split brain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1522-1532.