Fruitful visual search: Inhibition of return in a virtual foraging task

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 891-895

  Thomas, Laura E ^a   Ambinder, Michael S ^a   Hsieh, Brendon ^a   Levinthal, Brian ^a   Crowell, James A ^a   Irwin, David E ^a   Kramer, Arthur F ^a   Lleras, Alejandro ^a   Simons, Daniel J ^a   Ranxiao, Frances Wang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847617377     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194015     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. DANZIGER, S., KINGSTONE, A., & SNYDER, J. J. (1998). Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1467-1475.
2. GILCHRIST, I. D., & HARVEY, M. (2000). Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search. Current Biology, 10, 1209-1212.
3. GILCHRIST, I. D., NORTH, A., & HOOD, B. (2001). Is visual search really like foraging? Perception, 30, 1459-1464.
4. HOOGE, I. T. C., OVER, E. A. B., VAN WEZEL, R. J. A., & FRENS, M. A. (2005). Inhibition of return is not a foraging facilitator in saccadic search and free viewing. Vision Research, 45, 1901-1908.
5. HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394, 575-576.
6. KLEIN, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
7. KLEIN, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-146.
8. KLEIN, R. M., & MACINNES, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352.
9. KLEIN, R. M., & TAYLOR, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113-150). New York: Academic Press.
10. MACINNES, W. J., & KLEIN, R. M. (2003). Inhibition of return biases orienting during the search of complex scenes. Scientific World Journal, 3, 75-86.
11. MÜLLER, H. J., & VON MÜHLENEN, A. (2000). Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1591-1605.
12. POSNER, M. L, & COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 551-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. POSNER, M. I., RAFAL, R. D., CHOATE, L. S., & VAUGHAN, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228.
14. SAMUEL, A. G., & KAT, D. (2003). Inhibition of return: A graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 897-906.
15. SNYDER, J. J., & KINGSTONE, A. (2000). Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited? Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 452-458.
16. SNYDER, J. J., & KINGSTONE, A. (2001). Inhibition of return at multiple locations in visual search: When you see it and when you don't. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1221-1237.
17. TAKEDA, Y., & YAGI, A. (2000). Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 927-934.
18. TIPPER, S. P., GRISON, S., & KESSLER, K. (2003). Long-term inhibition of return of attention. Psychological Science, 14, 19-25.
19. TIPPER, S. P., WEAVER, B., JERREAT, L. M., & BURAK, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 478-499.
20. TIPPER, S. P., WEAVER, B., & WATSON, F. L. (1996). Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations: Commentary on Pratt and Abrams (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1289-1293.
21. WOLFE, J. M., & POKORNY, C. (1990). Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 357-362.