Computational methods in authorship attribution

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 9-26

  Koppel, Moshe ^a   Schlier, Jonathan ^a   Argamon, Shlomo ^b  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b Illinois Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTHORSHIP ATTRIBUTION; CLASSIFICATION METHODS; MACHINE LEARNING METHODS; MACHINE-LEARNING; TRAINING TEXT; VERIFICATION PROBLEMS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS; ROBOT LEARNING;

WIMAX (CANDIDATE);

EID: 58449112832     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20961     Document Type: Article

References (148)

1. Abbasi, A., & Chen, H. (2005). Applying authorship analysis to extremist-group Web forum messages. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20(5), 67-75.
2. Abbasi, A., & Chen, H. (2008). Writeprints: A stylometric approach to identity-level identification and similarity detection. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 26(2), 1-29.
3. Argamon, S. (2008). Interpreting Burrows's Delta: Geometric and probabilistic foundations. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 23(2), 131-147.
4. Argamon, S., Koppel, M., Fine, J., & Shimoni, A. (2003). Gender, genre, and writing style in formal written texts. Text, 23(3), 321-346.
5. Argamon, S., Koppel, M., Pennebaker, J., & Schler, J. (in press). Automatically profiling the author of an anonymous text. Communications of the ACM, in press.
6. Argamon, S., & Levitan, S. (2005). Measuring the usefulness of function words for authorship attribution. In Proceedings of the ACH/ALLC Conference, Victoria, BC, Canada.
7. Argamon, S., Whitelaw, C, Chase, P., Hota, S., Garg, N., & Levitan, S. (2007). Stylistic text classification using functional lexical features. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 802-821.
8. Argamon-Engelson, S., Koppel, M., & Avneri, G. (1998). Style-based text categorization: What newspaper am I reading? In Proceedings of the A A AI Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization (pp. 1-4). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
9. Baayen, H., van Halteran, H., Neijt, A., & Tweedie, F. (2002). An experiment in authorship attribution. Journees internationales d'Analyse statistique des Donnees Textuelles, 6.
10. Baayen, H., van Halteren, H., & Tweedie, F.J. (1996). Outside the cave of shadows: Using syntactic annotation to enhance authorship attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 11, 121-131.
11. Benedetto, D., Caglioti, E., & Loreto, V. (2002). Language trees and zipping. Physical Review Letters, 88(4), 487-490.
12. Binongo, J.N.G. (2003). Who wrote the 15th Book of Oz? An application of multivariate analysis to authorship attribution. Chance, 16(2), 9-17.
13. Binongo, J.N.G., & Smith, M.W.A. (1999). The application of principal component analysis to stylometry. Literacy and Linguistic Computing, 14, 445-466.
14. Brill, E. (1992). A simple rule-based part-of-speech tagger. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing (pp. 152-155). East Stroudsburg, PA: ACL.
15. Brinegar, C.S. (1963). Mark Twain and the Quintus Curtius Snodgrass Letters: A statistical test of authorship. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 85-96.
16. Burger, J., & Henderson, J. (2006). An exploration of features for predicting blogger age. In the AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs (pp. 47-54). NY: ACM Press.
17. Burrows, J.F. (1987). Word patterns and story shapes: The statistical analysis of narrative style. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 2, 61-70.
18. Burrows, J.F. (1989). "An ocean where each kind ...:" Statistical analysis and some major determinants of literary style. Computers and the Humanities, 23(4), 309-321.
19. Burrows, J.F. (1992a). Computers and the study of literature. In C. Butler (Ed.), Computers and written text: Applied language studies (pp. 167-204). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
20. Burrows, J.F. (1992b). Not unless you ask nicely: The interpretative nexus between analysis and information. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 7(2), 91-109.
21. Burrows, J.F. (2002a). Delta: A measure of stylistic difference and a guide to likely authorship. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17, 267-287.
22. Burrows, J.F. (2002b). The Englishing of Juvenal: Computational stylistics and translated texts. Style, 36, 677-699.
23. Burrows, J. (2007). All the way through: Testing for authorship in different frequency strata. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 21, 27-47.
24. Chambers, J.K., Trudgill, P., & Schilling-Estes, N. (2004). The handbook of language variation and change. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
25. Chaski, C. (2001). Empirical evaluations of language-based author identification techniques. Forensic Linguistics, 81, 1-65.
26. Chaski, C. (2005). Who's at the keyboard? Authorship attribution in digital evidence investigations. International Journal of Digital Evidence, 4(1), 1-13.
27. Chaski, C. (2007, July). Multilingual forensic author identification through n-gram analysis. Paper presented at the 8th Biennial Conference on Forensic Linguistics/Language and Law, Seattle, WA.
28. Chung, C.K., & Pennebaker, J.W. (2007). The psychological function of function words. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication: Frontiers of social psychology (pp. 343-359). New York: Psychology Press.
29. Clement, R., & Sharp, D. (2003). Ngram and Bayesian classification of documents. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 18, 423-447.
30. Clough, P. (2000). Plagiarism in natural and programming languages: An overview of current tools and technologies. University of Sheffield, UK, Research Memoranda No. CS-00-05, Department of Computer Science.
31. Corney, M., de Vel, O., Anderson, A., & Mohay, G. (2002). Gender-preferential text mining of e-mail discourse. In Proceedings of the 18th annual Computer Security Applications Conference, pp. 282-289. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
32. Craig, H. (1999). Authorial attribution and computational stylistics: If you can tell authors apart, have you learned anything about them? Literacy and Linguistic Computing, 14, 103-113.
33. Damashek, M. (1995). Gauging similarity withn-grams: Language independent categorization of text. Science, 267(5199), 843-848.
34. de Vel, O., Anderson. A., Corney, M.. & Mohay, G.M. (2001). Mining e-mail content for author identification forensics. SIGMOD Record, 30(4), 55-64.
35. de Vel, O., Corney, M., Anderson, A., & Mohay, G. (2002). E-mail authorship attribution for computer forensics. In D. Barbara & S. Jajodia (Eds.), Applications of data mining in computer security. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
36. Diederich, J., Kindermann, J., Leopold, E., & Paass, G. (2003). Authorship attribution with support vector machines. Applied Intelligence, 19(1), 109-123.
37. Dumais, S., Platt, J., Heckerman, D., & Sahami, M. (1998). Inductive learning algorithms and representations for text categorization. Proceedings of ACM-CIKM 1998 (pp. 148-155). NY: ACM Press.
38. Forman, G. (2003). An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(1), 1289-1305.
39. Forsyth. R.S.. & Holmes, D.I. (1996). Feature-finding for text classification. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 11(4), 163-174.
40. Foster, D. (2000). Author unknown: On the trail of anonymous. New York: Holt.
41. Fucks, W. (1952). On the mathematical analysis of style. Biometrica, 39, 122-129.
42. Gamon, M. (2004). Linguistic correlates of style: Authorship classification with deep linguistic analysis features. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of Computational Linguistics (pp. 611-617), Geneva.
43. Genkin, A., Lewis, D., & Madigan, D. (2006). Large-scale Bayesian logistic regression for text categorization. Technometrics. 49(3), 291-301.
44. Graham, N., Hirst, G., & Marthi, B. (2005). Segmenting documents by stylistic character. Natural Language Engineering, 11(4), 397 415.
45. Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., & Meunier, F. (2002). The international corpus of learner English. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
46. Grieve, J. (2007). Quantitative authorship attribution: An evaluation of techniques. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 22(3), 251-270.
47. Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2003). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Hodder Arnold.
48. Hirst, G., & Feiguina, O. (2007). Bigrams of syntactic labels for authorship discrimination of short texts. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 22(4), 405-417.
49. Holmes, D. (1998). The evolution of stylometry in humanities scholarship. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 13(3), 111-117.
50. Holmes, D. (2003). Stylometry and the Civil War. Chance, 16(2), 18-25.
51. Holmes, D., & Forsyth, R. (1995). The Federalist revisited: New directions in authorship attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 10(2), 111-127.
52. Holmes, D.I., Gordon, L.,amp;Wilson, C. (2001). A widow and her soldier: Stylometry and the American Civil War. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 16(4), 403-420.
53. Holmes, D.I., Robertson, M., & Paez, R. (2001). Stephen Crane and the New York Tribune: A case study in traditional and non-traditional authorship attribution. Computers and the Humanities, 35(3), 315-331.
54. Honore, A. (1979). Some simple measures of richness of vocabulary. Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing Bulletin, 7(2), 172-177.
55. Hoorn. J., Frank, S., Kowalczyk, W., & van der Ham, F. (1999). Neural network identification of poets using letter sequences. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 14(3), 311-338.
56. Hoover, D.L. (2002). Frequent word sequences and statistical stylistics. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17, 157-180.
57. Hoover, D.L. (2003a). Frequent collocations and authorial style. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 18, 261-286.
58. Hoover, D.L. (2003b). Multivariate analysis and the study of style variation. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 18, 341-360.
59. Hoover, D.L. (2003c). Another perspective on vocabulary richness. Computers and the Humanities, 37, 151-178.
60. Hoover, D. (2004a). Testing Burrows's Delta. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 19(4), 453-475.
61. Hoover, D. (2004b). Delta prime? Literary and Linguistic Computing, 19(4), 477-495.
62. Houvardas, J., & Stamatatos, E. (2006). N-gram feature selection for authorship identification. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, Applications (pp. 77-86). NY: Springer.
63. Joachims, T. (1998). Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML-98) (pp. 137-142). NY: Springer.
64. John, O.P. (1990). The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In O.P. John & L.A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford Press.
65. Juola, P. (1998). Cross-entropy and linguistic typology. In Proceedings of New Methods in Language Processing 3. Sydney, Australia.
66. Juola, P. (2008). Author attribution, Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 1(3), 233-334.
67. Juola. P., & Baayen, H. (2005). A controlled-corpus experiment in authorship identification by cross-entropy. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 20(Suppl. 1), 59-67.
68. Karlgren, J., & Cutting, D. (1994). Recognizing text genres with simple metrics using discriminant analysis. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 1071-1075), Kyoto, Japan.
69. Keselj, V, Peng, F., Cercone, N., & Thomas, C. (2003). N-gram-based author profiles for authorship attribution. In Proceedings of PACLING 2003 (pp. 255-264), Halifax, Canada.
70. Kessler, B., Nunberg, G., & Schütze, H. (1997). Automatic detection of genre. In Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 8th Meeting of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 32-38). East Stroudsburg, PA: ACL.
71. Khmelev, D. V. (2001). Disputed authorship resolution through using relative empirical entropy for Markov Chains of letters in human language text. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics. 7(3). 201-207.
72. Khmelev, D.V., & Teahan, W.J. (2003). A repetition based measure for verification of text collections and for text categorization. In Proceedings of the 26th SIGIR Conference (pp. 104-110). NY: ACM Press.
73. Khmelev, D.V, & Tweedie, F.J. (2002). Using Markov chains for identification of writers. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 16(4), 299-307.
74. Kjell, B. (1994a). Authorship attribution of text samples using neural networks and Bayesian classifiers. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (p. 1660), San Antonio, TX.
75. Kjell, B. (1994b). Authorship determination using letter pair frequencies with neural network classifiers. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 9(2), 119-124.
76. Kjell, B., Woods, W.A., & Frieder, O. (1995). Information retrieval using letter tuples with neural network and nearest neighbor classifiers. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2, 1222-1225, Vancouver, BC.
77. Koppel, M., Akiva, N., & Dagan, I. (2006). Feature instability as a criterion for selecting potential style markers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(11), 1519-1525.
78. Koppel, M., Argamon. S., & Shimoni, A. (2002). Automatically categorizing written texts by author gender. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17(4), 401-112.
79. Koppel, M., Mughaz, D & Akiva, N. (2006). New methods for attribution of Rabbinic literature. Hebrew Linguistics: A Journal for Hebrew Descriptive, Computational and Applied Linguistics, 57, 5-18.
80. Koppel, M., & Schler, J. (2003). Exploiting stylistic idiosyncrasies for authorship attribution. In Proceedings of the I.JCAI 2003 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Style Analysis and Synthesis (pp. 69-72), Acapulco, Mexico.
81. Koppel, M., & Schler, J. (2004). Authorship verification as a one class classification problem. In Proceedings of ECML (p. 62), Banff, Canada.
82. Koppel, M., Schler, J., Argamon, S., & Messeri, E. (2006). Authorship attribution with thousands of candidate authors. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development on Information Retrieval (pp. 659-660). NY: ACM Press.
83. Koppel, M., Schler, J., & Bonchek-Dokow, E. (2007). Measuring differentiability: Unmasking pseudonymous authors. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 8, 1261-1276.
84. Koppel, M., Schler, J., & Zigdon, K. (2005). Determining an author's native language by mining a text for errors. In Proceedings of KDD 2005 (pp. 624-628), Chicago, IL.
85. Kukushkina, O.V., Polikarpov, A.A., & Khmelev, D.V. (2001). Using literal and grammatical statistics for authorship attribution. Problems of Information Transmission. 37(2), 172-184.
86. Ledger. G & Merriam, T. (1994). Shakespeare, Fletcher, and the two noble kinsmen. Literacy and Linguistic Computing, 9, 235-248.
87. Lewis, D.D., & Ringuette, M. (1994). Comparison of two learning algorithms for text categorization. In Proceedings of the 3rd annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval (SDAIR '94) (pp. 81-93).
88. Li, J., Zheng, R., & Chen, H. (2006). From fingerprint to writeprint. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 76-82.
89. Littlestone, N. (1988). Learning quickly when irrelevant attributes abound: A new linear threshold algoridim. Machine Learning, 2(4), 285-318.
90. Love, H. (2002). Attributing authorship: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
91. Lowe, D., & Matthews, R. (1995). Shakespeare vs. Fletcher: A stylometric analysis by Radial Basis Functions. Computers and the Humanities, 29, 449-461.
92. Madigan, D., Genkin, A., Lewis. D.D., Argamon, S., Fradkin, D., & Ye, L. (2006). Author identification on the large scale. In Proceedings of the Classification Society of North America.
93. Manevitz, L.M., & Yousef, M. (2001). One-class svms for document classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2, 139-154.
94. Martindale, C, & McKenzie, D. (1995). On the utility of content analysis in author attribution: The "Federalist." Computers and the Humanities, 29, 259-270.
95. Marton, Y, Wu, N., & Hellerstein, L. (2005). On compression-based text classification. In Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on IR Research (pp. 300-314). NY: Springer.
96. Mascol, C. (1888a). Curves of pauline and pseudo-pauline style i. Unitarian Review, 30, 452-460.
97. Mascol, C. (1888b). Curves of pauline and pseudo-pauline style ii. Unitarian Review, 30, 539-546.
98. Matthews, R., & Merriam, T. (1993). Neural computation in stylometry: An application to the works of Shakespeare and Fletcher. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 203-209.
99. Matthiessen, C. (1992). Lexicogrammatical cartography. Tokyo: International Languages Sciences.
100. McEnery, A., & Oakes, M. (2000). Authorship studies/textual statistics. In R. Dale, H. Moisl. & H. Somers (Eds.), Handbook of natural language processing (pp. 545-562). New York: Marcel Dekker.
101. Mealand, D.L. (1995). Correspondence analysis of Luke. Literacy and Linguistic Computing, 10, 171-182.
102. Mendenhall, T.C. (1887). The characteristic curves of composition. Science, 9, 237-249.
103. Merriam, T. (1996). Marlowe's hand in Edward III revisited. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 11(1), 19-22.
104. Merriam, T., & Matthews, R. (1994). Neural computation in stylometry II: An application to the works of Shakespeare and Marlowe. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 9, 1-6.
105. Meyer zu Eissen, S., Stein, B & Kulig, M. (2007). Plagiarism detection without reference collections. In R. Decker & H.J. Lenz (Eds.), Advances in data analysis (pp. 359-366). NY: Springer.
106. Morton, A.Q. (1965). The audiorship of Greek prose. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (A), 128, 169-233.
107. Morton, A.Q. (1978). Literary detection. New York: Scribners.
108. Mosteller, E, & Wallace, D.L. (1964). Inference and disputed authorship: The Federalist. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Novak, J. Raghavan, P., & Tomkins, A. (2004). Anti-aliasing on the web. In Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference (pp. 30-39).
109. O'Donnell, B. (1966). Stephen Crane's The O'Ruddy: A problem in authorship discrimination. In J. Leed (Ed.), The computer and literary style (pp. 107-15). Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
110. Pavelec, D., Justino, E., & Oliveira, L.S. (2007). Author identification using stylometric features, lnteligencia Artificial, 11(36), 59-65.
111. Peng, F., Schuurmans, D., & Wang, S. (2004). Augmenting Naive Bayes text classifier with statistical language models. Information Retrieval, 7(3-4), 317-345.
112. Pennebaker, J.W., & King, L.A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1296-1312.
113. Pennebaker, J.W., Mehl, M.R., & Niederhoffer, K. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547-577.
114. Platt, J. (1998). Sequential minimal optimization: A fast algorithm for training support vector machines. Technical Report No. MST TR 98(14), Microsoft Research.
115. Quinlan, J.R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1(1), 81-106.
116. Rudman, J. (1997). The state of authorship attribution studies: Some problems and solutions. Computers and the Humanities, 31(4), 351-365.
117. Salton, G. & Buckley, C. (1988). Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing and Management: An International Journal, 24(5), 513-523.
118. Sanderson, C, & Guenter. S. (2006). Short text authorship attribution via sequence kernels, Markov chains and author unmasking: An investigation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 482-491).
119. Schler, J. (2007). Authorship attribution in the absence of a closed candidate set. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel, Department of Computer Science.
120. Schler, J., Koppel, M., Argamon, S., & Pennebaker, J. (2006). Effects of age and gender on blogging. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Approaches for Analyzing Weblogs (pp. 199-205). Menlo Patk, CA: AAAI Press.
121. Schülkopf, B., Platt, J., Shawe-Taylor, J., Smola, A.J., & Williamson, R.C. (2001). Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution. Neural Computation, 13, 1443-1471.
122. Sebastiani, F. (2002). Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys, 34(1), 1-47.
123. Sichel, H.S. (1975). On a distribution law for word frequencies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 542-547.
124. Sichel, H.S. (1986). Word frequency distributions and type-token characteristics. Mathematical Scientist, 11, 45-72.
125. Stamatatos, E. (2008). Author identification: Using text sampling to handle the class imbalance problem. Information Processing and Management, 44(2), 790-799.
126. Stamatatos, E., Fakotakis, N., & Kokkinakis, G. (2000). Automatic text categorization in terms of genre and author. Computational Linguistics, 26(4), 471-495.
127. Stamatatos, E., Fakotakis, N., & Kokkinakis, G. (2001). Computer-based authorship attribution without lexical measures. Computers and the Humanities, 35, 193-214.
128. Stein, S., & Argamon, S. (2006). A mathematical explanation of Burrows's Delta. In Proceedings of the Digital Humanities Conference (pp. 207-209). Paris, France.
129. Tax, D.M.J. (2001). One-class classification. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Technische Universiteit Delft.
130. Tweedie, F.J., & Baayen, R.H. (1998). How variable may a constant be? Measures of lexical richness in perspective. Computers and the Humanities, 32, 323-352.
131. Tweedie, F.J., Singh, S., & Holmes, D.I. (1996). Neural network applications in stylometty: The Federalist Papers. Computers and the Humanities, 30(1), 1-10.
132. Uzuner, O., & Katz, B. (2005). A comparative study of language models for book and author recognition. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3651, 969-980.
133. van Halteren, H. (2004, July). Linguistic profiling for authorship recognition and verification. In Proceedings of the 42nd Conference of the ACL (pp. 199-206). East Stroudsburg, PA: ACL.
134. van Halteren, H., Baayen, H., Tweedie, F, Haverkort, M.,& Neijt, A. (2005). New machine learning methods demonstrate the existence of a human stylome. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 12(1), 65-77.
135. Vazire, S. (2006). Informant reports: A cheap, fast, and easy method for personality assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 472-481.
136. Waugh, S., Adams, A., & Tweedie, F.J. (2000). Computational stylis-tics using Artificial Neural Networks. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 15(2), 187-198.
137. Whitelaw, C, Herke-Couchman, M., & Patrick, J. (2004, March). Identifying interpersonal distance using systemic features. AAAI Spring Symposium on Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text, Stanford, CA.
138. Witten, I.H., & Frank, E. (2000). Data mining: Practical machine learning tools with Java implementations. San Francisco: Kaufmann.
139. Yang, Y. (1999). An evaluation of statistical approaches to text categorization. Journal of Information Retrieval, 1(1-2), 67-88.
140. Yule, G.U. (1938). On sentence length as a statistical characteristic of style in prose with application to two cases of disputed authorship. Biometrika, 30, 363-390.
141. Yule, G.U. (1944). The statistical study of literary vocabulary. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
142. Zhang, D., & Lee, W.S. (2006). Extracting key-substring-group features for text classification. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 474-483). NY: ACM Press.
143. Zhao, Y, & Zobel, J. (2005). Effective authorship attribution using function word. In Proceedings of the 2nd AIRS Asian Information Retrieval Symposium (pp. 174-190). NY: Springer.
144. Zhao, Y, & Zobel, J. (2007). Searching with style: Authorship attribution in classic literature. In Proceedings of the 30th Australasian Conference on Computer Science (Vol. 62, 59-68), Ballarat, Australia.
145. Zhao, Y, Zobel, J., & Vines, P. (2006). Using relative entropy for authorship attribution. In Proceedings of the 3rd AIRS Asian Information Retrieval Symposium (pp. 92-105). NY: Springer.
146. Zheng, R. Li, J. Chen, H. & Huang, Z. (2006). A framework for authorship identification of online messages: Writing-style features and classification techniques. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 378-393.
147. Zigdon, K. (2005). Automatically determining an author's native language. Unpublished master's thesis, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel, Department of Computer Science.
148. Zipf, G.K. (1932). Selected studies of the principle of relative frequency in language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.