Segmenting documents by stylistic character

Natural Language Engineering

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 397-415

  Graham, Neil ^a,b   Hirst, Graeme ^a   Marthi, Bhaskara ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b IBM CANADA LTD   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHARACTER RECOGNITION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; STATISTICAL METHODS; SYNTACTICS;

DOCUMENT SEGMENTATION; STYLISTIC CHARACTER; TIME DELAY NEURAL NETWORKS;

TEXT PROCESSING;

EID: 28344449091     PISSN: 13513249     EISSN: 14698110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1351324905003694     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baljko, M. and Hirst, G. (1999) Subjectivity in stylistic assessment. Text Technology, 9(1): 5-17.
2. Bishop, C. M. (1995) Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press.
3. Brill, E. (1995) Transformation-based error-driven learning and natural language processing: A case study in part-of-speech tagging. Computational Linguistics, 21(4): 543-565.
4. Brown, P. F., Della Pietra, S. A., Della Pietra, V. J., Lai, J. C. and Mercer, R. L. (1992) An estimate of an upper bound for the entropy of English. Computational Linguistics, 18(1): 31-40.
5. Collins, J., Kaufer, D., Vlachos, P., Butler, B. and Ishizaki, S. (2004) Detecting collaborations in text: Comparing the authors' rhetorical language choices in The Federalist Papers. Computers and the Humanities, 38(1): 15-36.
6. Glover, A. and Hirst, G. (1996) Detecting stylistic inconsistencies in collaborative writing. In: Sharples, M. and van der Geest, T. (eds), The New Writing Environment: Writers at work in a world of technology, pp. 147-168. Springer-Verlag.
7. Graham, N. (2000) Automatic Detection of Authorship Changes within Single Documents. MSc thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto. (Technical report CSRG-406.) www.cs.toronto.edu/compling/ Publications/Abstracts/Theses/Graham-thabs.html
8. van Halteren, H., Zavrel, J. and Daelemans, W. (1998) Improving data driven wordclass tagging by system combination, Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 17th Annual Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING/ACL, pp. 491-497. Montreal.
9. Hatzivassiloglou, V., Klavans, J. L. and Eskin, E. (1999) Detecting text similarity over short passages: Exploring linguistic feature combinations via machine learning. Proceedings of the 1999 Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora, pp. 203-212.
10. Holmes, D. I. (1994) Authorship attribution. Computers and the Humanities, 28(2): 87-106.
11. Juola, P. (1997) What can we do with small corpora? Document categorization via cross-entropy. Proceedings of an Interdisciplinary Workshop on Similarity and Categorization, Edinburgh.
12. Kessler, B., Nunberg, G. and Schütze, H. (1997) Automatic detection of text genre. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 32-38. Madrid, Spain.
13. Kjell, B. and Frieder, O. (1992) Visualization of literary style. Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 656-661. Chicago, IL.
14. Kjell, B., Woods, W. A. and Frieder, O. (1994) Discrimination of authorship using visualization. Information Processing&Management, 30(1): 141-150.
15. Kučera, H. and Francis, W. N. (1967) Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Brown University Press, Providence, RI.
16. Lang, K., Waibel, A. H. and Hinton, G. E. (1990) A time-delay neural network architecture for isolated word recognition. Neural Networks, 3(1): 23-43.
17. Love, H. (2002) Attributing Authorship: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
18. Marcus, M. P., Santorini, B. and Marcinkiewicz, M. A. (1993) Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2): 313-330.
19. Matthews, R. A. J. and Merriam, T. V. N. (1997) Distinguishing literary styles using neural networks. In: Fiesler, E. and Beale, R. (eds), Handbook of Neural Computation. CD-ROM Edition, Release 97/1, Section G8.1. Oxford University Press.
20. Merriam, T. (1994) Letter frequency as a discriminator of authors. Notes &Queries, 41(4): 467-470.
21. Mosteller, F. and Wallace, D. L. (1964) Inference and Disputed Authorship: The Federalist. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
22. Peng, F., Schuurmans, D., Keselj, V. and Wang, S. (2003a) Language independent authorship attribution using character level language models. Proceedings, 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 267-274. Budapest.
23. Peng, F., Schuurmans, D. and Wang, S. (2003b) Language and task independent text categorization with simple language models. Proceedings, Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 189-196. Edmonton, Canada.
24. Posner, I. R. and Baecker, R. M. (1992) How people write together. Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, volume IV, pp. 127-138. Reprinted in: Ronald M. Baecker (ed.) Readings in Groupware and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 239-250. Morgan Kaufmann.
25. Ratnaparkhi, A. (1996) A maximum entropy part-of-speech tagger. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, University of Pennsylvania.
26. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. and Williams, R. J. (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323(9): 533-536.
27. SNNS. Stuttgart Neural Network Simulator, University of Stuttgart, Institute for Parallel and Distributed High Performance Systems (IPVR), Stuttgart, 1990-95, and University of Tübingen, Wilhelm-Schickard Institute for Computer Science, Tübingen, 1996-98.
28. Schmid, H. (1995) TreeTagger - a language independent part-of-speech tagger. Institut für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Stuttgart.
29. Stamatatos, E., Fakotakis, N. and Kokkinakis, G. (1999) Automatic authorship attribution. Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 158-164. Bergen, Norway.
30. Stamatatos, E., Fakotakis, N. and Kokkinakis, G. (2000) Automatic text categorization in terms of genre and author. Computational Linguistics, 26(4): 471-495.
31. Tweedie, F. J., Singh, S. and Holmes, D. I. (1996a) An introduction to neural networks in stylometry. Research in Humanities Computing 5, pp. 249-263. Oxford University Press.
32. Tweedie, F. J., Singh, S. and Holmes, D. I. (1996b) Neural network applications in stylometry: The Federalist Papers. Computers and the Humanities, 39(1): 1-10.
33. Wilson, M. (1987) MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine Usable Dictionary, Version 2.00 Informatics Division, Science and Engineering Research Council, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.