New machine learning methods demonstrate the existence of a human stylome

Journal of Quantitative Linguistics

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 65-77

  Van Halteren, Hans ^a   Baayen, Harald ^b   Tweedie, Fiona ^c   Haverkort, Marco ^a,d   Neijt, Anneke ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^d Boston University

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31044451593     PISSN: 09296174     EISSN: 17445035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09296170500055350     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Atkinson, M. (1992). Children's Syntax. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
2. Baayen, R.H., van Halteren, H., & Tweedie, F. (1996). Outside the Cave of Shadows: Using syntactic annotation to enhance authorship attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 7, 91-109.
3. Baayen, R.H., van Halteren, H., Neijt, A., & Tweedie, F. (2002). An experiment in authorship attribution. In Proceedings J ADT 2002 (pp. 69-75).
4. Broeders, A.P.A. (2001). Forensic speech and audio analysis, forensic linguistics 1998-2001 - A Review. In Proceedings 13th Interpol Forensic Science Symposium, Lyon, France.
5. Burrows, J.F. (1992). Computers and the study of literature. In C.S. Butler (Ed.), Computers and written texts (pp. 167-204). Oxford: Blackwell.
6. Chaski, C.E. (2001). Empirical evaluations of language-based author identification techniques. Forensic Linguistics, 8(1), 1-65.
7. Chomsky, N. (1999). On the nature, use, and acquisition of language. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 33-54). San Diego: Academic Press.
8. Clark, E.V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Gopnik, M. (Ed.). (1997). The inheritance and innateness of grammars. In Vancouver studies in cognitive science, volume 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Grant, T., & Baker, K. (2001). Identifying reliable, valid markers of authorship: A response to Chaski. Forensic Linguistics, 8(1), 66-79.
12. Guasti, M.-T. (2002). Language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. van Halteren, H., Zavrel, J., & Daelemans, W. (2001). Improving accuracy in word class tagging through the combination of machine learning systems. Computational Linguistics, 27(2), 199-230.
14. van Halteren, H. (2001). A default first order weight determination procedure for WPDV models. In Proceedings CoNLL 2001, pp. 119-122.
15. Harris, J. (1998). The nurture assumption. New York, NY: The Free Press.
16. Holmes, D.I. (1998). Authorship attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 13(3), 111-117.
17. Jenkins, L. (2000). Biolinguistics: Exploring the biology of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Karmiloff, K., & Karmiloff-Smith A. (2001). Pathways to Language: From Fetus to Adolescent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Mosteller, F., & Wallace, D.L. (1984). Applied Bayesian and classical inference in the case of the federalist papers(2nd edition). New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
20. O'Grady, W. (1999). The acquisition of syntactic representations: A general nativist approach. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Child Language Acquisition (pp. 157-194). San Diego: Academic Press.
21. Pawlowski, A. (1998). Séries temporelles en linguistique. Avec application à l'attribution de textes: Romain Gary et Emile Ajar. Paris & Genève: Champion-Slatkine.
22. Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. London: Allen Lane.
23. Quinlan, J.R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1, 81-206.
24. Quinlan, J.R. (1993). C4.5: Programs for machine learning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
25. Rice, M. (Ed.). (1996). Towards a genetics of language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Rudman, J. (1998). The state of the authorship attribution studies: some problems and solutions. Computers and the Humanities, 31, 351-365.
27. Rudman, J. (2000). The style-marker mapping project: a rationale and progress report. ALLC/ACH 2000 Conference Abstracts.
28. Schütze, C. (1996). The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
29. Strozer, J. (1994). Language acquisition after puberty. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
30. Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origin of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Wexler, K. (1999). Maturation and growth of language. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 55-110). San Diego: Academic Press.