Compression of digital images in radiology - Results of a consensus conference;Kompression digitaler bilddaten in der radiologie - Ergebnisse einer konsensuskonferenz

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 181, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 32-37

  Loose, Reinhard ^a   Braunschweig, R ^b   Kotter, E ^c   Mildenberger, P ^d   Simmler, R ^a   Wucherer, M ^a  

^a KLINIKUM NÜRNBERG   (Germany)

^b BG KLINIKEN BERGMANNSTROST   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^d JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Consensus conference; Diagnostic image quality; DICOM; Image compression; JPEG; JPEG 2000

Indexed keywords

COMPRESSION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSENSUS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY; GERMANY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY;

DATA COMPRESSION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 58249092846     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027847     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Breeuwer M, Heusdens R, Gunnewiek RK et al. Data compression of x-ray cardio-angiographic image series. Int J Card Imaging 1995; 11: 179-186
2. Eraso FE, Analoui M, Watson AB et al. Impact of lossy compression on diagnostic accuracy of radiographs for periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 93: 621-625 (Pubitemid 41124656)
3. Goldberg MA, Gazelle GS, Boland GW et al. Focal hepatic lesions: effect of three-dimensional wavelet compression on detection at CT. Radiology 1997; 202: 159-165
4. Ko JP, Chang J, Bomsztyk E et al. Effect of CT image compression on computer-assisted lung nodule volume measurement. Radiology 2005; 237: 83-88 (Pubitemid 41346149)
5. Yamamoto S, Johkoh T, Mihara N et al. Evaluation of compressed lung CT image quality using quantitative analysis. Radiat Med 2001; 19: 321-329 (Pubitemid 34105912)
6. Kondo Y. [Medical image transfer for emergency care utilizing internet and mobile phone. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 2002; 58: 1393-1401
7. Sung MM, Kim HJ, Yoo SK et al. Clinical evaluation of compression ratios using JPEG2000 on computed radiography chest images. J Digit Imaging 2002; 15: 78-83
8. Kalyanpur A, Neklesa VP, Taylor CR et al. Evaluation of JPEG and wavelet compression of body CT images for direct digital teleradiologic transmission. Radiology 2000; 217: 772-779 (Pubitemid 30952191)
9. Zalis ME, Hahn PF, Arellano RS et al. CT colonography with teleradiology: effect of lossy wavelet compression on polyp detection - initial observations. Radiology 2001; 220: 387-392
10. Baker WA, Hearne SE, Spero LA et al. Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features. Circulation 1997; 96: 1157-1164
11. Fidler A, Likar B, Pernus F et al. Impact of JPEG lossy image compression on quantitative digital subtraction radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 106-112 (Pubitemid 38993335)
12. Ohgiya Y, Gokan T, Nobusawa H et al. Acute cerebral infarction: effect of JEPG compression on detection at CT. Radiology 2003; 227: 124-127 (Pubitemid 36384189)
13. Savcenko V, Erickson BJ, Persons KR et al. An evaluation of JPEG and JPEG 2000 irreversible compression algorithms applied to neurologic computed tomography and magnetic resonance images. Joint Photographic Experts Group. J Digit Imaging 2000; 13: 183-185
14. Azpiroz-Leehan J, Leder R, Lerallut JF. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of filter characteristics for wavelet packet compression of MR images. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2004; 2: 1537-1540 (Pubitemid 40036088)
15. Goldberg MA, Pivovarov M, Mayo-Smith WW et al. Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163: 463-468 (Pubitemid 24242540)
16. Woo HS, Kim KJ, Kim TJ et al. JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT: difference in tolerance between thin- and thick-section images. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: 535-541
17. Kopp IB, Selbmann HK, Koller M. Konsensusfindung in evidenzbasierten Leitlinien - vom Mythos zur rationalen Strategie. Z ärztl Fortbild QualGesundh wes (ZaeFQ) 2007; 101: 89-95
18. Das Leitlinien-Manual von AWMF und ÄZQ. Z ärztl Fortbild Qual sich (ZaeFQ) 2001; 95: 1-84
19. http://www.uni-mainz.de/FB/Medizin/Radiologie/agit/Welcome.html, Stand 13.10.2008
20. http://ikrweb.uni-muenster.de/aptdir/apt.html, Stand 13.10.2008
21. Koff DA, Shulman H. An Overview of Digital Compression of Medical Images: Can We Use Lossy Image Compression in Radiology? Can Assoc Radiol J 2006; 57: 211-217
22. Loose R, Walz M, Schinkmann M et al. Anforderungen an verlustbehaftete JPEG und Wavelet Bildkompressionen in FDDI-, Ethernet-, ISDN- und Analog-Netzen in der Radiologie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1996; 164: 79
23. Loose R, Detmar K, Schulz-Wendtland R et al. Wavelet Bildkompression von Digitalen Mammographieaufnahmen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007; 179: 220
24. Loose R, Simmler R, Detmar K et al. Monitor reading of lossy compressed digital mammograms. European Radiology 2008; 18: 152
25. Fründ R, Jähnig V, Strotzer M et al. Akzeptanzanalyse einer digitalen Bildverteilung in einem filmlosen Universitätsklinikum. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007; 179: 160-165
26. Heye T, Kurz P, Eiers M et al. Eine radiologische Fallsammlung mit interaktivem Charakter als neues Element in der studentischen Ausbildung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2008; 180: 337-344
27. http://www.rcr.ac.uk/docs/radiology/pdf/IT-guidance-LossyApr08.pdf, Stand 13.10.2008