Acute cerebral infarction: Effect of JPEG compression on detection at CT

Radiology

Volumn 227, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 124-127

  Ohgiya, Yoshimitsu ^a   Gokan, Takehiko ^a   Nobusawa, Hiroshi ^a   Hirose, Masanori ^a   Seino, Noritaka ^a   Fujisawa, Hidefumi ^b   Baba, Maiko ^a   Nagai, Kyoko ^a   Tanno, Keisuke ^a   Takeyama, Nobuyuki ^a   Munechika, Hirotsugu ^a  

^a SHOWA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b SHOWA UNIVERSITY NORTHERN YOKOHAMA HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Brain, CT; Computed tomography (CT), image processing; Data compression; Images, interpretation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BRAIN INFARCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPRESSION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; MONITOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; TECHNIQUE;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CEREBRAL INFARCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0037381406     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2271020067     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Karson TH, Chandra S, Morehead AJ, Stewart WJ, Nissen SE, Thomas JD. JPEG compression of digital echocardiographic images: impact on image quality. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1995; 8:306-318.
2. MacMahon H, Doi K, Snada S, et al. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. Radiology 1991; 178:175-179.
3. Gorldberg MA, Pivovarov M, Mayo-Smith WW, et al. Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163:463-468.
4. Chameroy V, Di Paola R. High compression of nuclear medicine dynamic studies. Int J Card Imaging 1990; 5:261-269.
5. Rigolin VH, Robiolio P, Spero LA, et al. Compression of digital coronary angiogram does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78:131-135.
6. Silber S, Doee R, Zindler G, et al. Impact of various compression rates on interpretation of digital coronary angiogram. Int J Cardiol 1997; 60:195-200.
7. Erickson BJ, Manduca A, Palisson P, et al. Wavelet compression of medical images. Radiology 1998; 206:599-607.
8. Maldijian JA, Liu WC, Hirschorn D, Murthy R, Semanczuk W. Wavelet transform-based image compression for transmission of MR data. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:23-26.
9. Cosman PC, Davidson HC, Bergin CJ, et al. Thoracic CT images: effect of lossy image compression on diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 1994; 190:517-524.
10. Goldgberg MA, Gazelle GS, Boland GW, et al. Focal hepatic lesions: effect of three-dimensional wavelet compression on detection at CT. Radiology 1997; 202:159-165.
11. Zheng LM, Sone S, Itani Y, et al. Effect of CT digital image compression on detection of coronary artery calcification. Acta Radiol 2000; 41:116-121.
12. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, et al. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS). Lancet 1998; 352:1245-1251.
13. Kummer RV, Bourquain H, Bastianello S, et al. Early prediction of irreversible brain damage after ischemic stroke at CT. Radiology 2001; 219:95-100.
14. Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986; 21:720-733.
15. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989; 24:234-245.