Effect of CT image compression on computer-assisted lung nodule volume measurement

Radiology

Volumn 237, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 83-88

  Ko, Jane P ^a   Chang, Jeffrey ^a   Bomsztyk, Elan ^a   Babb, James S ^a   Naidich, David P ^a   Rusinek, Henry ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPRESSION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUNG NODULE; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; TUMOR CALCINOSIS; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; CALCINOSIS; DATA COMPRESSION; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG DISEASES; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 25144519182     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2371041079     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Awai K, Murao K, Ozawa A, et al. Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists' detection performance. Radiology 2004;230:347-352.
2. Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Kostis WJ, Zhao B, Henschke CI. Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology 2000; 217:251-256.
3. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:205-216.
4. Rubin GD. Data explosion: the challenge of multidetector-row CT. Eur J Radiol 2000;36:74-80.
5. Slone RM, Foos DH, Whiting BR, et al. Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation. Radiology 2000;215:543-553.
6. Erickson BJ, Manduca A, Persons KR, et al. Evaluation of irreversible compression of digitized posterior-anterior chest radiographs. J Digit Imaging 1997;10:97-102.
7. Goldberg MA, Gazelle GS, Boland GW, et al. Focal hepatic lesions: effect of three-dimensional wavelet compression on detection at CT. Radiology 1997;202:159-165.
8. Li F, Sone S, Takashima S, et al. Effects of JPEG and wavelet compression of spiral low-dose CT images on detection of small lung cancers. Acta Radiol 2001;42:156-160.
9. Ko JP, Rusinek H, Naidich DP, et al. Wavelet compression of low-dose chest CT data: effect on lung nodule detection. Radiology 2003;228:70-75.
10. Ko JP, Rusinek H, Jacobs E, et al. Volume measurement of small pulmonary nodules on chest CT: a phantom study. Radiology 2003;228:864-870.
11. Cosman PC, Davidson HC, Bergin CJ, et al. Thoracic CT images: effect of lossy image compression on diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 1994;190:517-524.
12. Kerensky RA, Cusma JT, Kubilis P, et al. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology International Study of Angiographic Data Compression phase I: the effects of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography. Eur Heart J 2000;21:668-678.
13. Tuinenbutg JC, Koning G, Hekking E, et al. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology International Study of Angiographic Data Compression phase II: the effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography. Joint Photographic Experts Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1380-1387.
14. Kostis WJ, Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Fluture SC, Henschke CI. Small pulmonary nodules: reproducibility of three-dimensional volumetric measurement and estimation of time to follow-up CT. Radiology 2004;231:446-452.
15. Wormanns D, Kohl G, Klotz E, et al. Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol 2004;14:86-92.