Impact of JPEG lossy image compression on quantitative digital subtraction radiography

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 106-112

  Fidler, A ^a   Likar, B ^a   Pernus F ^a   Skaleric U ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b Dept of Syst Contr and Cybernet ^*  (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Alveolar process; Diagnostic imaging, subtraction technique; Image compression; Radiography, dental

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE MODEL; EXOSTOSIS; JAW; JAW DISEASE; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; SWINE;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EXOSTOSES; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR DISEASES; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; STATISTICS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; SWINE;

EID: 0036491761     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600670     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GCH, van der Stelt PF. Efficacy of digital intra-oral radiography in clinical dentistry. J Dentistry 1997; 25: 215-224.
2. Wong S, Zaremba L, Gooden D, Huang HK. Radiographic image compression - A review. Proc. IEEE 1995; 83: 194-219.
3. MacMahon H, Doi K, Sanada S, Montner SM, Giger ML, Metz CE, et al. Data compression: Effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. Radiology 1991; 178: 175-179.
4. Good WF, Maitz GS, Gur D. JPEG compatible data compression of mammograms. J Digit Imaging 1994; 7: 123-132.
5. Sneiderman C, Schosser R, Pearson TG. A comparison of JPEG and FIF compression of color medical images for dermatology. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1994; 18: 339-342.
6. Baker WA, Hearne SE, Spero LA, Morris KG, Harrington RA, Sketch Jr MH, et al. Lossy (15: 1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features. Circulation 1997; 96: 1157-1164.
7. Wenzel A, Borg E, Hitze H, Gröndahl HG. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor system: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 250-254.
8. Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E, Borg E, Gröndahl HG. Impact of lossy image compression on accuracy of caries detection in digital images taken with a storage phosphor system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 81: 351-355.
9. Yuasa H, Ariji Y, Ohki M, Naitoh M, Shiojima M, Ushida M, et al. Joint Photographic Experts Group compression of intraoral radiographs for images transmission on the World Wide Web. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88: 93-99.
10. Janhom A, van der Stelt PF, van Ginkel FC. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29: 20-27.
11. Cosman P, Gray R, Olshen R. Quality evaluation for compressed medical images: Fundamentals. In: Bankman (ed). Handbook of Medical Imaging. San Diego: Academic Press, 2000, pp 803-819.
12. Gröndahl HG, Gröndahl K. Subtraction radiography for the diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983; 55: 208-213.
13. Vos MH, Janssen PT, Van Aken J, Heethaar RM. Quantitative measurement of periodontal bone changes by digital subtraction. J Periodontal Res 1986; 21: 583-591.
14. Brägger U, Pasquali L, Rylander H, Carnes D, Kornman KS. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis in periodontal radiography. A methodological study. J Clin Periodontol 1988; 15: 27-37.
15. Jeffcoat MK, Reddy MS. Digital subtraction for longitudinal assessment of peri-implant bone change: method and validation. Adv Dent Res 1993; 7: 196-201.
16. Lehmann TM, Gröndahl HG, Benn DK. Computer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29: 323-346.
17. Ruttimann UE, Webber RL, Schmidt E. A robust digital method for film contrast correction in subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 1986; 21: 486-495.
18. Likar B, Pernuš F. A hierarchical approach to elastic registration based on mutual information. Image and Vision Computing 2001; 9: 33-44.
19. Likar B, Pernuš F. Registration of serial transverse sections of muscle fibers. Cytometry 1999; 37: 93-106.
20. Hausmann E, Allen K, Loza J, Buchanan W, Cavanaugh PF. Validation of quantitative digital subtraction radiography using the electronically guided alignment device/impression technique. J Periodontol 1996; 67: 895-899.
21. Gürdal P, Hildebolt CF, Akdeniz BG. The effects of different image file formats and image-analysis software programs on dental radiometric digital evaluations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001; 30: 50-55.