Effects of mental model quality on collaborative system performance

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 3, Issue , 2007, Pages 1506-1510

  Wilkison, Bart D ^a   Fisk, Arthur D ^a   Rogers, Wendy A ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED SYSTEMS; COLLABORATIVE SYSTEMS; MENTAL MODELS; NAVIGATIONAL AIDS; TASK ENVIRONMENTS; USER MENTAL MODELS; USER TRAININGS;

AUTOMATION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 58149527501     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1998). Individual and team decision making under stress: theoretical underpinnings. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making Decisions Under Stress (pp. 17-38). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Dzindolet, M. T., Peterson, S.A., Pomranky, R. A., Pierce L. G., & Beck, H. P. (2003). The role of trust in automation reliance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6), 697-718.
3. Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32-64.
4. Gilbert, K. D., & Rogers, W. A. (1999). Age-related differences in the acquisition, utilization, and extension of a spatial mental model. Journal of Gerontology, 54(4), 246-255.
5. th Annual Meeting, 175-178.
6. Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273-283.
7. Nass, C., Steuer, J., & Tauber, E. R. (1994). Computers are social actors. Proceedings of the CHI'94 conference, 72-78.
8. Nass, C., Fogg, B. J., & Moon, Y. (1996). Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 45, 669-678.
9. Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Green, N. (1997). Are machines gender neutral? Gender-stereotypic responses to computers with voices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(10), 864-876.
10. Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Carney, P. (1999). Are people polite to computers? Responses to computer-based interviewing systems. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 1093-1110.
11. Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81-103.
12. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2), 230-253.
13. Salas, E., Prince, C., Baker, D. P., & Shrestha, L. (1995). Situation awareness in team performance: implication for measurement and training. Human Factors, 37(1), 123-136.
14. Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Milanovich, D. M. (1999). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: an empirical link is established. Human Factors, 41(1), 61-71.
15. Volpe, C. E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1996). The impact of cross-training on team functioning: an empirical investigation. Human Factors, 38(1), 87-100.