Stabilisation operationalised: Using time series analysis to understand the dynamics of research collaboration

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 36-48

  Vasileiadou, Eleftheria ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ARIMA models; E science; Online data; Scientific collaboration; Time series analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 58149458390     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2008.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arrow H., McGrath J.E., and Berdahl J.L. Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development and adaptation (2000), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
2. Atkinson P., Batchelor C., and Parsons E. Trajectories of collaboration and competition in a medical discovery. Science, Technology and Human Values 23 3 (1998) 259-284
3. Beaver D.D. Feature report: Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study). Scientometrics 52 3 (2001) 365-377
4. Birnholtz, J. P. (2005). When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of Collaboration propensity in science and engineering research. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Michigan.
5. Boomgarden H.J., and Vliegenthart R. Explaining the rise of anti-immigrant parties: The role of news media content. Electoral studies 26 (2007) 404-417
6. Bozeman B., and Corley E. Scientists' collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy 33 4 (2004) 599-616
7. Caldas A. Are newsgroups extending 'invisible colleges' into the digital infrastructure of science?. Economics Innovation and New Technologies 12 1 (2003) 43-60
8. Cronin B. The scholar's courtesy. The role of acknowledgements in primary communication process (1995), Taylor Graham, London
9. Cronin B. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52 7 (2001) 558-569
10. Garvey W.D. Communication: The essence of science (1979), Pergamon Press, Oxford
11. Giles C.L., and Councill I.G. Who gets acknowledged: Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgment indexing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 51 (2004) 17599-17604
12. Gläser J. What internet use does and does not change in scientific communities. Science Studies 16 1 (2003) 38-51
13. Gottman J.M. Time-series analysis: A comprehensive introduction for social scientists (1981), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
14. Hackett E.J. Introduction: Special guest-edited issue on scientific collaboration. Social Studies of Science 35 5 (2005) 667-671
15. Hara N., Solomon P., Kim S., and Sonnenwald D.H. An emerging view of scientific collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 54 10 (2003) 952-965
16. Heimeriks G., and Vasileiadou E. Changes or transition? Analysing the use of ICTs in sciences. Social Science Information 47 1 (2008) 5-29
17. Heimeriks G., van den Besselaar P., and Frenken K. Digital disciplinary differences: An analysis of computer mediated science and "Mode 2" knowledge production. Research Policy 37 9 (2008) 1602-1615
18. Hollanders D., and Vliegenthart R. Telling what yesterday's news might be tomorrow: Modeling media dynamics. Communications 33 (2008) 47-68
19. Jeffrey P. Smoothing the waters: Observations on the process of cross-disciplinary research collaboration. Social Studies of Science 33 4 (2003) 539-562
20. Katz J.S., and Martin B.R. What is research collaboration. Research Policy 26 1 (1997) 1-18
21. Laudel G. Collaboration and reward: What do we measure by co-authorships?. Research Evaluation 11 1 (2002) 3-15
22. Lee S., and Bozemann B. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science 35 5 (2005) 673-702
23. Matzat U. Academic communication and IDGs. Social Networks 26 3 (2004) 221-255
24. McCleary R., Hay Jr. R.A., Meidinger E.E., and McDowall D. Applied time series analysis for the social sciences (1980), Sage Publications, London
25. Nentwich M. Cyberscience: Research in the age of the internet (2003), Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, Vienna
26. Prabowo R., and Thelwall M. Finding and tracking subjects within an ongoing debate. Journal of Informetrics 2 2 (2008) 107-127
27. Rip A. An exercise in foresight: The research system in transition. In: Cozzens S.E. (Ed). The Research System in Transition (1990), Kluwer, Dordrecht 387-401
28. Romer D. Time series models. In: Romer D., Kenski K., Winneg K., Adasiewicz C., and Hall Jamieson K. (Eds). Capturing Campaign Dynamics, 2000 and 2004, The National Annenberg Election Survey (2006), University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia 165-243
29. Schunn C., Crowley K., and Okada T. What makes collaborations across a distance succeed? The case of the cognitive science community. In: Hinds P., and Kiesler S. (Eds). Distributed Work (2002), The MIT Press, Cambridge 407-430
30. Shrum W., Genuth J., and Chompalov I. Structures of scientific collaboration (2007), The MIT Press, Cambridge
31. Sonnenwald D.H. Scientific collaboration. In: Cronin B. (Ed). Annual review of information science and technology vol. 41 (2007), Information Today, Medford, NJ 643-681
32. SPSS Inc. Trends™ SPSS/PC+™ For the IBM PC/XT/AT (1987), SPSS Inc., Chicago
33. Vasileiadou E., and van den Besselaar P. One method fits all? Studying a research team using different data and methods. Presented in the Symposium New Research for New Media "Innovative Research Methodologies". Terragona (2004)
34. Walsh J.P., and Maloney N.G. Computer network use, collaboration structures and productivity. In: Hinds P., and Kiesler S. (Eds). Distributed Work (2002), The MIT Press, Cambridge 433-458
35. Warner R.M. Spectral analysis of time-series data (1998), The Guilford Press, New York
36. Yin R.K. Case study research: Design and methods. Applied social research methods series volume 5. 3rd ed. (2003), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks