Digital disciplinary differences: An analysis of computer-mediated science and 'Mode 2' knowledge production

Research Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1602-1615

  Heimeriks, Gaston ^a   van den Besselaar, Peter ^b   Frenken, Koen ^c  

^a Advisory Council for Science and Technology Policy   (Netherlands)

^b Rathenau Institute KNAW   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASTROPHYSICS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER SCIENCE; DIGITAL ARITHMETIC; HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTERNET; TECHNOLOGY; WORLD WIDE WEB;

KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION; ON-LINE COMMUNICATIONS;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 50949131642     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abels E.G., Liebscher P., and Denman D.W. Factors that influence the use of electronic networks by science and engineering faculty at small institutions. Part I. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47 (1996) 146-158
2. Arroyo, N., Pareja, V.M., Aguillo, I., 2003. D3.2: Description of Web data in D3.1. CINDOC, Madrid. Available at: http://www.eicstes.org/EICSTES_PDF/Deliverables/Web%20data%20description .PDF.
3. Barjak F. On the Integration of the Internet into Informal Science Communication (2004), University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Solothurn
4. Buckland M. The landscape of information science: The American Society for Information Science at 62. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50 11 (1999) 970-974
5. Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society (1996), Blackwell, Oxford
6. Castells M. Informationalism, networks, and the network society: a theoretical blueprint. In: Castells M. (Ed). The Network Society. A Cross-cultural Perspective (2004), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA 3-48
7. Chesbrough H. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (2003), Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge
8. Cooke P., Uranga M.G., and Extebarria G. Regional innovation systems: an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Planning A 30 (1998) 1563-1584
9. In: Cozzens S., Healey P., Rip A., and Ziman J. (Eds). The Research System in Transition (1990), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA
10. Cronin B. Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on Web-based citation analysis. Journal of Information Science 27 1 (2001) 1-7
11. De Jong H., and Rip A. The computer revolution in science: steps towards the realization of computer-supported discovery environments. Artificial Intelligence 91 (1997) 225-256
12. Dosi, G., Llerena, P., Sylos Labin, M., 2005. Science-technology-industry links and the "European Paradox": some notes on the dynamics of scientific and technological research in Europe. BETA Working Paper 2005-10. University of Strasbourg.
13. Etzkowitz H., and Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Introduction to the special 'Triple Helix' issue of Research Policy 29 2 (2000) 109-123
14. Florida R. The Rise of the Creative Class (2002), Basic Books, New York
15. Galison P. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Physics (1997), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
16. Gibbons M.C., Limoges H., Nowotny S., Schwartzman P.S., and Trow M. The New Production of Knowledge (1994), Sage, London
17. Gooding D.C. Narrowing the cognitive span: experimentation, visualisation and digitalisation. In: Radder H. (Ed). Scientific Experimentation and its Philosophical Significance (2002), University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburg
18. Heimeriks, G.J., 2005. Knowledge production and communication in the information society. Mapping communications in heterogeneous research networks. PhD Dissertation. University of Amsterdam.
19. Heimeriks G.J., Hörlesberger M., and Van den Besselaar P. Mapping communication and collaboration in heterogeneous research networks. Scientometrics 58 2 (2003) 391-413
20. Heimeriks G., and Van den Besselaar P. Analyzing hyperlinks networks; the meaning of hyperlink based indicators of knowledge production. Cybermetrics 10 1 (2006)
21. Heimeriks G., and Vasileiadou E. Changes or transition? Analysing the use of ICTs in sciences. Social Science Information 47 1 (2008) 5-29
22. Kling R., and McKim G. Not just a matter of time: field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51 14 (2000) 1306-1320
23. Knorr Cetina K. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences make Knowledge (1999), Harvard University Press
24. Koehler W. Information science as "Little Science": The Implications of a bibliometric analysis of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Scientometrics 51 1 (2001) 117-132
25. Lenoir T. Shaping biomedicine as an information science. In: Bowden M.E., Hahn T.B., and Williams R.V. (Eds). Proceedings of the 1998 Conference on the History and Heritage of Science Information Systems (1999), Information Today, Inc, Medford, NJ 27-45
26. Luhmann N. Modern Society Shocked by Risks (1996), Social Sciences Research Centre, Hong Kong pp. 3-19
27. Lundvall B. Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G., and Soete L. (Eds). Technical Change and Economic Theory (1988), Pinter, London 349-369
28. McKelvey M.D. Evolutionary Innovations: The Business of Biotechnology (1996), Oxford University Press, Oxford
29. Nentwich M. Cyberscience, Research in the Age of the Internet (2003), Austrian Academy of Sciences
30. Nowotny S., Scott J., and Gibbons M. Re-Thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (2001), Polity Press, Cambridge
31. OECD. The Global Research Village: How Information and Communication Technologies Affect the Science System (1998), OECD, Paris
32. Price D.d.S. Little Science, Big Science (1963), Columbia University Press, New York
33. Rip A. Fashions, lock-ins, and the heterogeneity of knowledge production. In: Jacob M., and Hellström T. (Eds). The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy (2000), Open University Press, Buckingham
34. Rip A. Science for the 21st century. In: Tindemans P., Verrijn-Stuart A., and Visser R. (Eds). The Future of the Sciences and Humanities (2002), Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam
35. Rip A., and Van der Meulen B. The post-modern research system. Science and Public Policy 23 6 (1996) 343-352
36. Traweek S. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists (1988), Harvard University Press
37. Van den Besselaar P., and Heimeriks G.J. Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: a method and an exploratory case study. Scientometrics 68 3 (2006)
38. Vasileiadou E. Formal Scientific Communication through the Internet: The Case Study of Online Journals (2001), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
39. Vasileiadou E., and Van den Besselaar P. One Method fits all? Studying a scientific emailing list combining different data and methods. New Research for New Media. Symposium "Innovative Research Methodologies". Terragona, Spain (2004)
40. Walsh J.P., and Bayma T. Computer networks and scientific work. Social Studies of Science 26 (1996) 661-703
41. Walsh J.P., Kucker S., et al. Connecting minds: computer-mediated communication and scientific work. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51 14 (2000) 1295-1305
42. Weingart P. From "finalization" to "Mode 2": old wine in new bottles?. Social Science Information 36 4 (1997) 591-613
43. Whitley R. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford
44. Wouters, P., 2006. 'What is the matter with e-science: thinking aloud about informatization in knowledge creation', Pantaneto forum [available at: http://www.pantaneto.co.uk/issue23/wouters.htm].