The exploitation of complementarities in scientific production process at the laboratory level

Technovation

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 455-465

  Carayol, Nicolas ^a   Matt, Mireille ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LOUIS PASTEUR   (France)

Author keywords

Academic Research Laboratory; Economics of science; Organisation; Typology

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; PROCESS CONTROL; PRODUCT DESIGN; PRODUCTIVITY; RESEARCH LABORATORIES; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

ACADEMIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES; ECONOMICS OF SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH; TYPOLOGY;

PRODUCTION CONTROL;

EID: 2442551528     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adams J., Griliches Z. Measuring science: an exploration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. 93:1996;12664-12670.
2. Arora A., David P.A., Gambardella A. Reputation and competence in publicly funded science: estimating the effects on research group productivity. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique. 49/50:1998;163-198.
3. Allison P.D., Long J.S. Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review. 55:1990;469-478.
4. Benzécri J.-P. Correspondence Analysis Handbook. 1992;Marcel Dekker, New York.
5. Bonaccorsi A., Daraio C. Age effects in scientific productivity. The case of the Italian National Research Council (CNR). Scientometrics. 58:(1):2003;35-48.
6. Carayol N. Objectives, agreements and matching in science industry collaborations: reassembling the pieces of the puzzle. Research Policy. 32:2003;887-1148.
7. Carayol, N., Matt, M., 2003. Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory level evidence from a large European university. Mimeo.
8. Cole S., Cole J. Social Stratification in Science. 1973;University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
9. Coupé T. Science is golden: academic R&D and university patents. Journal of Technology Transfer. 28:2003;31-46.
10. Crow M., Bozeman B. R&D laboratory classification and public policy: the effects of environmental context on laboratory behavior. Research Policy. 16:1987;229-258.
11. Dasgupta P., David P.A. Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy. 23:1994;487-521.
12. Diamond A.M. The life-cycle research productivity of mathematicians and scientists. The Journal of Gerontology. 41:1986;520-525.
13. Fox M.F. Research, teaching and publication productivity: mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education. 65:1992;293-305.
14. Henderson R., Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M. Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. Review of Economics and Statistics. 80:1998;119-127.
15. Joly P.B., Mangematin V. Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and organisation of R&D: the dynamics of industrial relationships in a large research organization. Research Policy. 25:1996;901-922.
16. Laredo P., Mustar P. Laboratory activity profiles: an exploratory approach. Scientometrics. 47:2000;515-539.
17. Levin S.G., Stephan P.E. Research productivity over the life cycle: evidence for academic scientists. American Economic Review. 81:1991;114-132.
18. Long J.S. Productivity and academic position in the scientific career. American Sociological Review. 43:1978;880-908.
19. Long J.S., McGinnis R. Organizational context and scientific productivity. American Sociological Review. 46:1981;422-442.
20. Lotka A.J. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences. 16:1996;317-323.
21. Mairesse J., Turner L. A look at individual differences in scientific research productivity: an econometric analysis of the publications of the French CNRS physicists in condensed matter (1980-1997). Conference 'Rethinking Science Policy: Analytical Frameworks for Evidence-based Policy', March 21-23: 2002;SPRU, Brighton.
22. Stephan P.E. The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature. 34:1996;1199-1235.
23. Stephan P. Gender differences in the rewards to publishing in Academe: science in the 70's. SEX Roles. 38:1998;11-12.
24. Stephan P.E., Gurmu S., Sumell A.J., Black G. Individual patenting and publication activity: having one's cake and eating it too. Conference 'Rethinking Science Policy: Analytical Frameworks for Evidence-based Policy', March 21-23: 2002;SPRU, Brighton.
25. Wallmark J.T. Innovations and patents at universities: the case of Chalmers University of Technology. Technovation. 17:1997;127-139.
26. Weiss Y., Lillard L.A. Output variability, academic labor contracts, and waiting times for promotion. Research in Labor Economics. 5:1982;157-188.
27. Zuckerman H.A., Merton R.K. Age, aging, and age structure in science. Riley M.R., Johnson M., Foner A. A Sociology of Age Stratification: Aging and Society. vol. 3:1972;Russel Sage Foundation, New York. Reprinted in: Storer, N.W. (Ed.), 1973. The Sociology of Science: Collected Papers of R.K. Merton. University Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 497-559.
28. Zuckerman H.A., Merton R.K. Age, aging, and age structure in science. Riley M.R., Johnson M., Foner A. A Sociology of Age Stratification: Aging and Society. vol. 3:1972;Russel Sage Foundation, New York. Reprinted in: Storer, N.W. (Ed.), 1973. The Sociology of Science: Collected Papers of R.K. Merton. University Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 497-559.