The impact of familial environment on depression scores after genetic testing for cancer susceptibility

Clinical Genetics

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 43-49

  Ashida, Sato ^a,c   Hadley, D W ^a   Vaughn, B K ^b   Kuhn, N R ^a   Jenkins, J F ^a   Koehly, L M ^a  

^a NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer worry; CES D; Family relationships; Genetic testing; Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer; Lynch syndrome; Social environment

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY; COHORT ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION; FAMILIAL CANCER; FAMILY LIFE; FAMILY RELATION; FAMILY STRESS; FEMALE; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TREND STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS, HEREDITARY NONPOLYPOSIS; DEPRESSION; FAMILY RELATIONS; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58149199543     PISSN: 00099163     EISSN: 13990004     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01104.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Rolland JS, Williams JK. Toward a biopsychosocial model for 21st-century genetics. Fam Process 2005: 44: 3-24.
2. van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Duivenvoorden HJ et al. A prospective study of the impact of genetic susceptibility testing for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC on family relationships. Psychooncology 2007: 16: 320-328.
3. Lynch HT, De la Chapelle A. Hereditary colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2003: 348: 919-932.
4. Lindor NM, Petersen GM, Hadley DW et al. Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome: A systematic review. JAMA 2006: 296: 1507.
5. Jarvinen HJ, Aarnio M, Mustonen H et al. Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2000: 118: 829-834.
6. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: Clinical guidelines and rationale - Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003: 124: 544.
7. Meiser B. Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: An update of the literature. Psychooncology 2005: 14: 1060-1074.
8. Lodder LN, Frets PG, Trijsburg RW et al. Presymptomatic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: How distressing are the pre-test weeks? J Med Genet 1999: 36: 906-913.
9. Esplen MJ, Madlensky L, Butler K et al. Motivations and psychosocial impact of genetic testing for HNPCC. Am J Med Genet 2001: 103: 9-15.
10. Broadstock M, Michie S, Marteau T. Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: A systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet 2000: 8: 731-738.
11. Lerman C, Croyle RT, Tercyak KP et al. Genetic testing: Psychological aspects and implications. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002: 70: 784-797.
12. Gritz ER, Peterson SK, Vernon SW et al. Psychological impact of genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005: 23: 1902-1910.
13. Cohen MM. Statement of the American Society of Human Genetics on genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer predisposition. Am J Hum Genet 1994: 55.
14. Bruinooge SS. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 2003: 21: 2397.
15. McKinnon WC, Guttmacher AE, Greenblatt MS et al. The familial cancer program of the vermont cancer center: Development of a cancer genetics program in a rural area. J Genet Couns 1997: 6: 131-145.
16. Hughes C, Lerman C, Schwartz M et al. All in the family: Evaluation of the process and content of sisters' communication about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results. Am J Med Genet 2002: 107: 143-150.
17. Smith KR, West JA, Croyle RT et al. Familial context of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: Moderating effect of siblings'test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999: 8: 385-392.
18. Koehly LM, Peters J, Kuhn N et al. Sisters in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer families: Communal coping, social integration, and psychological well-being. Psychooncology 2008: 17: 812-821.
19. Peterson SK. The role of the family in genetic testing: Theoretical perspectives, current knowledge, and future directions. Health Educ Behav 2005: 32: 627-639.
20. Esplen MJ, Urquhart C, Butler K et al. The experience of loss and anticipation of distress in colorectal cancer patients undergoing genetic testing. J Psychosom Res 2003: 55: 427-435.
21. Sobel S, Cowan CB. Ambiguous loss and disenfranchised grief: The impact of DNA predictive testing on the family as a system. Fam Process 2003: 42: 47-57.
22. Tercyak KP, Peshkin BN, Streisand R et al. Psychological issues among children of hereditary breast cancer gene (BRCA1/2) testing participants. Psychooncology 2001: 10: 336-346. 10
23. Hadley DW, Jenkins J, Dimond E et al. Genetic counseling and testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Arch Intern Med 2003: 163: 573-582.
24. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977: 1: 385-401.
25. Moos RH, Moos BS. Family Environment Scale Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press, 1986.
26. Lerman C, Daly M, Sands C et al. Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993: 85: 1074-1080.
27. Lerman C, Daly M, Masny A et al. Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 1994: 12: 843-850.
28. Lerman C, Hughes C, Trock BJ et al. Genetic testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. JAMA 1999: 281: 1618-1622.
29. Raudenbush S, Bryk A. Applications in meta-analysis and other cases where level-1 variances are known. Hierarchical Linear Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002: 205-227.
30. Raudenbush S, Bryk A, Congdon R. HLM: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling for Windows. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc., 2007.
31. Biesecker BB, Erby L. Adaptation to living with a genetic condition or risk: Mini-review. Clin Genet (in press).
32. DeMaso DR, Gonzalez-Heydrich J, Erickson JD et al. The experience journal: A computer-based intervention for families facing congenital heart disease. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000: 39: 727-734.
33. van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Duivenvoorden HJ et al. Family system characteristics and psychological adjustment to cancer susceptibility genetic testing: A prospective study. Clin Genet 2007: 71: 35-42.
34. Afifi TD, Hutchinson S, Krouse S. Toward a theoretical model of communal coping in postdivorce families and other naturally occurring groups. Comm Theory 2006: 16: 378-409.
35. Gottman JM, Krokoff LJ. Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. J Consult Clin Psychol 1989: 57: 47-52.
36. Holmes JG. Social relationships: The nature and function of relational schemas. Eur J Soc Psychol 2000: 30: 447-495.
37. Carlsson C, Nilbert M. Living with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer; experiences from and impact of genetic testing. J Genet Counseling 2007: 16: 811-820.
38. Stroup AM, Smith KR. Familial effects of BRCA1 genetic mutation testing: changes in perceived family functioning. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007: 16: 135-141.
39. Collins FS, Green ED, Guttmacher AE et al. A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature 2003: 422: 835-847.