Familial effects of BRCA1 genetic mutation testing: Changes in perceived family functioning

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 135-141

  Stroup, Antoinette M ^a,b   Smith, Ken R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b UTAH CANCER REGISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILY COPING; FAMILY FUNCTIONING; FAMILY STRESS; FEMALE; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC RISK; HEREDITY; HETEROZYGOTE DETECTION; HUMAN; MALE; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; ONCOGENE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FAMILY HEALTH; FAMILY RELATIONS; FEMALE; GENES, BRCA1; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMANS; MALE; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; UTAH;

EID: 33846583726     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0178     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Croyle RT, Smith KR, Botkin JR, Baty B, Nash J. Psychological responses to BRCA1 mutation testing: preliminary findings. Health Psychol 1997;16: 63-72.
2. DudokdeWit AC, Duivenvoorden HJ, Passchier J, Niermeijer MF, Tibben A. Course of distress experienced by persons at risk for an autosomal dominant inheritable disorder participating in a predictive testing program: an explorative study. Rotterdam/Leiden Genetics Workgroup. Psychosom Med 1998;60:543-9.
3. DudokdeWit AC, Tibben A, Duivenvoorden HJ, Niermeijer MF, Passchier J. Predicting adaptation to presymptomatic DNA testing for late onset disorders: who will experience distress? Rotterdam Leiden Genetics Workgroup. J Med Genet 1998;35:745-54.
4. Lerman C, Croyle RT. Emotional and behavioral responses to genetic testing for susceptibility to cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 1996;10:191-5,9; discussion 200-2.
5. Smith KR, Ellington L, Chan AY, Croyle RT, Botkin JR. Fertility intentions following testing for a BRCA1 gene mutation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:733-40.
6. Smith KR, West JA, Croyle RT, Botkin JR. Familial context of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: moderating effect of siblings' test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:385-92.
7. Hasten DF, Ford D, Bishop DT. Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet 1995;6:265-71.
8. Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 2003;72:1117-30.
9. Thompson D, Easton DF. Cancer Incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1358-65.
10. Halbert CH, Schwarte MD, Wenzel L, et al. Predictors of cognitive appraisals following genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. J Behav Med 2004;27:373-92.
11. McInerney-Leo A, Biesecker BB, Hadley DW, et al. BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families II: impact on relationships. Am J Med Genet 2005;133:165-9.
12. Kaplan HB. Perspectives on psychosocial stress. In: Kaplan HB, editor. Psychosocial stress: Perspectives on structure, theory, life course, and methods. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996. p. 3-24.
13. McCubbin HI, Thompson AI. Family assessment inventories for research and practice. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin-Madison; 1991.
14. McCubbin HI, Thompson AI, McCubbin MA. Family assessment: Resiliency, coping, and adaptation-inventories for research and practice. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin-Madison; 1996.
15. Goldgar DE, Fields P, Lewis CM, et al. A large kindred with 17q-linked breast and ovarian cancer: genetic, phenotypic, and genealogical analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86:200-9.
16. Botkin JR, Croyle RT, Smith KR, et al. A model protocol for evaluating the behavioral and psychosocial effects of BRCA1 testing. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:872-82.
17. Olson DH, McCubbin HI, Barnes H, Larsen A, Muxen M, Wilson M. Family Inventories. St. Paul: David H. Olson, Family Social Science, University of Minnesota; 1985.
18. Olson DH, Portner J. Family adaptability and cohesion scales. In: Filsinger EE, editor. Marriage and family assessment: a sourcebook for family therapy. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage Publications; 1993. p. 299-315.
19. Spielberger CD, Vagg PR, Barker LR, Donham GW, Westberry LG. The factor structure of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. In: Sarason IG, Spielberger CD, editors. Stress and anxiety 7. Washington (DC): Hemisphere Publishing; 1980. p. 95-109.
20. Byrk AS, Raudenbush SW. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1992.
21. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Regression analysis for correlated data. Annu Rev Public Health 1993;14:43-68.
22. Pancheri P, De Martino V, Spiombi G, Biondi M, Mosticoni S. Life stress events and state-trait anxiety in psychiatric and psychosomatic patients. In: Spielberger CD, Sarason IG, editors. Stress and anxiety 10. Washington (DC): Hemisphere Publishing; 1986. p. 367-95.
23. Coyne JC, Kruus L, Racioppo M, Calzone KA, Armstrong K. What do ratings of cancer-specific distress mean among women at high risk of breast and ovarian cancer? Am J Med Genet 2003;116:222-8.
24. Taylor SE, Aspinwall IG. Mediating and moderating processes in psychosocial stress. In: Kaplan HB, editor. Psychosocial stress: Perspectives on structure, theory, life course, and methods. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996. p. 71-110.
25. Tibben A, Roos RA, Niermeijer MF. Psychological consequences of presymptomatic testing for Huntington's disease. Lancet 1997;349:809.