Are People Excessive or Judicious in Their Egocentrism? A Modeling Approach to Understanding Bias and Accuracy in People's Optimism

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 95, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 253-273

  Windschitl, Paul D ^a   Rose, Jason P ^a   Stalkfleet, Michael T ^a   Smith, Andrew R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

comparative judgment; egocentrism; likelihood judgment; optimism; shared circumstance effect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; EGO; EMOTION; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SELF CONCEPT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; EGO; EMOTIONS; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTIVATION; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 58149134549     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.253     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Alicke M.D., and Govorun O. The better-than-average-effect. In: Alicke M.D., Dunning D.A., and Krueger J.I. (Eds). The self in social judgment (2005), Psychology Press, Philadelphia 85-106
2. Alicke M.D., Klotz M.L., Breitenbrecher D.L., Yurak T.J., and Vredenburg D.S. Personal contact, individuation, and the above-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 (1995) 804-825
3. Anderson C.A., Lepper M.R., and Ross L. Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1980) 1037-1049
4. Blanton H., Axsom D., McClive K., and Price S. Pessimistic bias in comparative evaluations: A case of perceived vulnerability to the effects of negative life events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27 (2001) 1627-1636
5. Brenner L.A., Koehler D.J., and Rottenstreich Y. Remarks on support theory: Recent advances and future directions. In: Gilovich T., Griffin D., and Kahneman D. (Eds). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (2002), Cambridge University Press, New York 489-509
6. Brier G.W. Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Review 78 (1950) 1-3
7. Burger J.M., and Burns L. The illusion of unique invulnerability and the use of effective contraception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 14 (1988) 264-270
8. Burson, K. A., & Klayman, J. (2006). Judgments of performance: The relative, the absolute, and the in between. Unpublished manuscript.
9. Burson K.A., Larrick R.P., and Klayman J. Skilled or unskilled, but still unaware of it: How perceptions of difficulty drive miscalibrations in relative comparisons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (2006) 60-77
10. Chambers J.R., and Suls J. The role of egocentrism and focalism in the emotion intensity bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43 (2007) 618-625
11. Chambers J.R., and Windschitl P.D. Biases in social comparative judgments: The role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects. Psychological Bulletin 130 (2004) 813-838
12. Chambers J.R., Windschitl P.D., and Suls J. Egocentrism, event frequency, and comparative optimism: When what happens frequently is more likely to happen to me. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 (2003) 1343-1356
13. Davis H.L., Hoch S.J., and Ragsdale E.K.E. An anchoring and adjustment model of spousal prediction. Journal of Consumer Research 13 (1986) 25-37
14. Dawes R.M., and Mulford M. The false consensus effect and overconfidence: Flaws in judgment of flaws in how we study judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 65 (1996) 201-211
15. Dunning D., Meyerowitz J.A., and Holzberg A.D. Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (1989) 1082-1090
16. Eiser J.R., Pahl S., and Prins Y.R.A. Optimism, pessimism, and the direction of self-other comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37 (2001) 77-84
17. Endo Y. Optimistic and pessimistic biases and comparative judgmental processes in Japan: Do people really compare themselves to their peers?. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 10 (2007) 224-232
18. Endo Y. The role of egocentrism in judgmental biases in social comparison under shared circumstances. The Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47 (2008) 134-145
19. Epley N., and Dunning D. The mixed blessing of self-knowledge in behavioral prediction: Enhanced discrimination but exacerbated bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32 (2006) 641-655
20. Fox C.R., and Levav J. Familiarity bias and belief reversal in relative likelihood judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82 (2000) 268-292
21. Giladi E.E., and Klar Y. When standards are wide of the mark: Nonselective superiority and inferiority biases in comparative judgments of objects and concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 131 (2002) 538-551
22. Goethals G.R., Messick D.M., and Allison S.T. The uniqueness bias: Studies of constructive social comparison. In: Suls J., and Wills T.A. (Eds). Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (1991), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 149-176
23. González-Vallejo C., and Bonham A. Aligning confidence with accuracy: Revisiting the role of feedback. Acta Psychologica 125 (2007) 221-239
24. Heine S.J., and Lehman D.R. Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the West feel more invulnerable than the East?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4 (1995) 595-607
25. Helweg-Larsen M., and Shepperd J.A. Do moderators of the optimistic bias affect personal or target risk estimates? A review of the literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review 51 (2001) 74-95
26. Hoch S.J. Perceived consensus and predictive accuracy: The pros and cons of projection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 (1987) 221-234
27. Hoch S.J. Who do we know? Predicting the interests and opinions of the American consumer. Journal of Consumer Research 15 (1988) 315-324
28. Hoorens V. Self-favoring biases, self-presentation, and the self-other asymmetry in social comparison. Journal of Personality 63 (1995) 793-817
29. Howell D.C. Statistical methods for psychology. 2nd ed. (1982), Duxbury Press, Boston
30. Idson L.C., Krantz D.H., Osherson D., and Bonini N. The relation between probability and evidence judgment: An extension of support theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 22 (2001) 227-249
31. Kahneman D., and Miller D.T. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review 93 (1986) 136-153
32. Karniol R. Egocentrism versus protocentrism: The status of self in social prediction. Psychological Review 110 (2003) 564-580
33. Klar Y. Way beyond compare: Nonselective superiority and inferiority biases in judging randomly assigned group members relative to their peers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38 (2002) 331-351
34. Klar Y., and Giladi E.E. No one in my group can be below the group's average: A robust positivity bias in favor of anonymous peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73 (1997) 885-901
35. Klar Y., and Giladi E.E. Are most people happier than their peers, or are they just happy?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 5 (1999) 585-594
36. Klar Y., Medding A., and Sarel D. Nonunique invulnerability: Singular versus distributional probabilities and unrealistic optimism in comparative risk judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67 (1996) 229-245
37. Klein W.M., and Weinstein N.D. Social comparison and unrealistic optimism about personal risk. In: Buunk B.P., and Gibbons F.X. (Eds). Health, coping, and well-being: Perspectives from social comparison theory (1997), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 25-61
38. Koehler D., Brenner L., and Tversky A. The enhancement effect in probability judgment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 10 (1997) 293-313
39. Krizan Z., and Windschitl P.D. Team allegiance can lead to both optimistic and pessimistic predictions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43 (2007) 327-333
40. Krueger J. Return of the ego-Self-referent information as a filter for social prediction: Comment on Karniol (2003). Psychological Review 110 (2003) 585-590
41. Krueger J., and Clement R.W. The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67 (1994) 596-610
42. Krueger J., and Zeiger J.S. Social categorization and the truly false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (1993) 670-680
43. Kruger J. Lake Wobegon be gone! The "below-average effect" and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (1999) 221-232
44. Kruger J., and Burrus J. Egocentrism and focalism in unrealistic optimism (and pessimism). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40 (2004) 332-340
45. Kruger J., Windschitl P.D., Burrus J., Fessel F., and Chambers J.R. On the rational side of egocentrism in social comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 (2008) 220-232
46. Larrick R. Debiasing. In: Koehler D.J., and Harvey N. (Eds). Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (2004), Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA 317-337
47. Larrick R.P., Burson K.A., and Soll J.B. Social comparison and confidence: When thinking you're better than average predicts overconfidence (and when it does not). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 102 (2007) 76-94
48. Lehman D.R., Krosnick J.A., West R.L., and Li F. The focus of judgment effect: A question wording effect due to hypothesis confirmation bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18 (1992) 690-699
49. Macchi L., Osherson D., and Krantz D.H. A note on superadditive probability judgment. Psychological Review 106 (1999) 210-214
50. Marks G., and Miller N. Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin 102 (1987) 72-90
51. McKenzie C.R.M. Taking into account the strength of an alternative hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24 (1998) 771-792
52. Moore D.A. Not so above average after all: When people believe they are worse than average and its implications for theories of bias in social comparison. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 102 (2007) 42-58
53. Moore D.A., and Cain D.M. Overconfidence and underconfidence: When and why people underestimate (and overestimate) the competition. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 103 (2007) 197-213
54. Moore D.A., and Kim T.G. Myopic social prediction and the solo comparison effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (2003) 1121-1135
55. Moore D.A., and Small D.A. Error and bias in comparative social judgment: On being both better and worse than we think we are. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92 (2007) 972-989
56. Mullen B., Atkins J.L., Champion D.S., Edwards C., Hardy D., Story J.E., and Vanderkiok M. The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 21 (1985) 262-283
57. Nisbett R.E., and Wilson T.D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84 (1977) 231-259
58. Pahl S., and Eiser J.R. Valence, comparison focus, and self-positivity biases: Does it matter whether people judge positive or negative traits?. Experimental Psychology 52 (2005) 303-310
59. Pahl S., and Eiser J.R. How malleable is comparative self-positivity? The effects of manipulating judgmental focus and accessibility. European Journal of Social Psychology 37 (2007) 617-627
60. Posavac S.S., Brakus J.J., Jain S.P., and Cronley M.L. Selective assessment and positivity bias in environmental valuation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 12 (2006) 43-49
61. Price P.C. A group size effect on personal risk judgments: Implications for unrealistic optimism. Memory & Cognition 29 (2001) 578-586
62. Price P.C., Smith A.R., and Lench H.C. The effect of target group size on risk judgments and comparative optimism: The more, the riskier. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (2006) 382-398
63. Rose, J. P., Endo, Y., Windschitl, P. D., & Suls, J. (in press). Cultural differences in unrealistic optimism and pessimism: The role of egocentrism and direct versus indirect comparison measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
64. Rose J.P., and Windschitl P.D. How egocentrism and optimism change in response to feedback in repeated competitions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 105 (2008) 201-220
65. Ross L., Greene D., and House P. The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13 (1977) 279-301
66. Ross M., and Sicoly F. Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (1979) 322-336
67. Rottenstreich Y., and Tversky A. Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: Advances in support theory. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 406-415
68. Sherman S.J., Presson C.C., and Chassin L. Mechanisms underlying the false consensus effect: The special role of threats to the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 10 (1984) 127-138
69. Suls, J., Krizan, Z., Chambers, J. R., & Mortensen, C. (2007). The role of focalism and group diffuseness in comparative biases. Manuscript submitted for publication.
70. Tversky A., and Koehler D.J. Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psychological Review 101 (1994) 547-567
71. Wegener D.T., and Petty R.E. The flexible correction model: The role of naïve theories of bias in bias correction. In: Zanna M.P. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology (1997), Academic Press, New York 141-208
72. Weinstein N.D. Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1980) 806-820
73. Weinstein N.D. Why it won't happen to me: Perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility. Health Psychology 3 (1984) 431-457
74. Weinstein N.D., and Klein W.M. Resistance of personal risk perceptions to debiasing interventions. Health Psychology 14 (1995) 132-140
75. Weinstein N.D., and Lachendro E. Egocentrism as a source of unrealistic optimism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 8 (1982) 195-200
76. Wilson T.D., and Brekke N.C. Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin 116 (1994) 117-142
77. Windschitl P.D. The binary additivity of subjective probability does not indicate the binary complementarity of perceived certainty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 81 (2000) 195-225
78. Windschitl P.D., Conybeare D., and Krizan Z. Direct-comparison judgments: When and why above- and below-average effects reverse. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 137 (2008) 182-200
79. Windschitl P.D., Kruger J., and Simms E.N. The influence of egocentrism and focalism on people's optimism in competitions: When what affects us equally affects me more. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (2003) 389-408
80. Yamagishi K. Proximity, compatibility, and noncomplementarity in subjective probability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 87 (2002) 136-155
81. Yates J.F. Judgment and decision making (1990), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
82. Yates J.F. Subjective probability accuracy analysis. In: Wright G., and Ayton P. (Eds). Subjective probability (1994), Wiley, Chichester, England 381-410