The effect of target group size on risk judgments and comparative optimism: The More, the Riskier

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 382-398

  Price, Paul C ^a   Smith, Andrew R ^a   Lench, Heather C ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative optimism; Numerosity perception; Probability judgment; Risk perception; Social cognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIFE EVENT; MALE; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RISK; SELF EVALUATION; STUDENT;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LIFE CHANGE EVENTS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PROBABILITY; RISK; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); STUDENTS;

EID: 33745101664     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.382     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alicke, M. D., Klotz, M. L., Breitenbecher, D. L., Yurak, T. J., & Vredenburg, D. S. (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 804-825.
2. Barth, H., Kanwisher, N., & Spelke, E. (2003). The construction of large number representations in adults. Cognition, 86, 201-221.
3. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Fmkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
4. Brewer, N. T., & Chapman, G. B. (2002). The fragile basic anchoring effect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 65-77.
5. Burger, J. M., & Burns, L. (1988). The illusion of unique invulnerability and the use of effective contraception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 264-270.
6. Downs, J. S., & Shafir, E. (1999). Why some are perceived as more confident and more insecure, more reckless and more cautious, more trusting and more suspicious, than others: Enriched and impoverished options in social judgment. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 598-610.
7. Eiser, R. J., Pahl, S., & Prins, Y. R. A. (2001). Optimism, pessimism, and the direction of self-other comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 77-84.
8. Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 307-314.
9. Fiedler, K. (1996). Explaining and simulating judgment biases as an aggregation phenomenon in probabilistic, multiple-cue environments. Psychological Review, 103, 193-214.
10. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risk and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1-17.
11. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). San Diego: Academic Press.
12. Harris, P., & Middleton, W. (1994). The illusion of control and optimism about health: On being less at risk but no more in control than others. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 369-386.
13. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356-388.
14. Helweg-Larsen, M., & Sheppard, J. A. (2001). Do moderators of the optimistic bias affect personal or target risk estimates? A review of the literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 74-95.
15. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford Press.
16. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 4, 528-551.
17. Hoorens, V. (1996). Self-favoring biases for positive and negative characteristics: Independent phenomena? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 53-67.
18. Hoorens, V., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Social comparison of health risks: Locus of control, the person-positivity bias, and unrealistic optimism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 291-302.
19. Klar, Y. (2002). Way beyond compare: Nonselective superiority and inferiority biases in judging randomly assigned group members relative to their peers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 331-351.
20. Klar, Y., & Ayal, S. (2004). Event frequency and comparative optimism: Another look at the indirect method of self-others risks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 805-814.
21. Klar, Y., & Giladi, E. E. (1997). No one in my group can be below the group's average: A robust positivity bias in favor of anonymous peers Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 885-901.
22. Klar, Y., & Giladi, E. E. (1999). Are most people happier than their peers, or are they just happy'' Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 585-594.
23. Klar, Y., Medding, A., & Sarel, D. (1996). Nonunique invulnerability Singular versus distributional probabilities and unrealistic optimism in comparative risk judgments. Organizational Behavior and Unman Decision Processes, 67, 229-245.
24. Klein, W. M. (1997). Objective standards are not enough: Affective, self-evaluative, and behavioral responses to social comparison information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 763-774.
25. Krueger, L. E. (1982). Single judgments of numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 175-182.
26. Kruger, J. (1999). Lake Wobegone be gone! The "below-average effect" and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 221-232.
27. Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S. J. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 522-544.
28. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267-286.
29. Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157.
30. Martin, L. L. (2000). Moods do not convey information: Moods in context do. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 153-177). New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Miller, C. T., & Felicio, D. M. (1990). Person-positivity bias: Are individuals liked better than groups? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 408-420.
32. Nilsson, I., & Ekehammar, B. (1987). Person-positivity bias in political perception'' European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 247-252.
33. Otten, W., & Van der Pligt, J. (1996). Context effects in the measurement of comparative optimism in probability judgments. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 80-101.
34. Pelham, B. W., Sumarta, T. T., & Myaskovsky, L. (1994). The easy path from many to much: The numerosity heuristic. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 103-133.
35. Perloff, L. S., & Fetzer, B. K. (1986). Self-other judgments and perceived vulnerability to victimization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 502-510.
36. Peterson, C. R., & Beach, L. R. (1967). Man as an intuitive statistician Psychological Bulletin, 68, 29-46.
37. Price, P. C. (2001). A group size effect on personal risk judgments: Implications for unrealistic optimism. Memory & Cognition, 29, 578-586.
38. Price, P. C., Pentecost, H. C., & Voth, R. D. (2002). Perceived event frequency and the optimistic bias: Evidence for a two-process model of personal risk judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 242-252.
39. Regan, P. C., Snyder, M., & Kassin, S. M. (1995). Unrealistic optimism: Self-enhance ment or person positivity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1073-1082.
40. Rothman, A. J., Klein, W. M., & Weinstein, N. D. (1996). Absolute and relative biases in estimations of personal risk. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1213-1236.
41. Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296-320.
42. Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527-561). New York: Guilford Press.
43. Sears, D. O. (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 233-250.
44. Sherman, S. J., & McConnell, A. R. (1996). The role of counter factual thinking in reasoning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 113-124.
45. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. W. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Intuitive judgment: Heuristics and biases (pp. 397-420). New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. van Oeffelen, M. P., & Vos, P. G. (1982). A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 163-170.
47. Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806-820.
48. Weinstein, N. D. (1987). Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: Conclusions from a community-wide sample. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10, 481-500.
49. Weinstein, N. D. (1989). Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science, 246, 1232-1233.
50. Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. (1996). Unrealistic optimism: Present and future. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 1-8.
51. Whitley, B. E., & Hern, A. L. (1991). Perceptions of vulnerability to pregnancy and the use of effective contraception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 104-110.
52. Wilson, T. D., Houston, C. E., Etling, K. M., & Brekke, N. (1996). A new look at anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125, 387-402.
53. Windschitl, P. D., Martin, R., & Flugstad, A. R. (2002). Context and the interpretation of likelihood information: The role of intergroup comparisons on perceived vulnerability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 742-755.
54. Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp 31-58). New York Cambridge University Press.