Lessons Learned From Developing a Tailored Print Intervention: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers New to Tailoring

Health Promotion Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 281-288

  Halder, Arada K ^a   Tiro, Jasmin A ^b   Glassman, Bernard ^c   Rakowski, William ^a   Fernandez, Maria E ^d   Perez, Catherine A ^a   Vernon, Sally W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

lessons learned; process evaluation; repeat mammography; tailored

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; REMINDER SYSTEM; SOCIAL MARKETING;

FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PAMPHLETS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; REMINDER SYSTEMS; SOCIAL MARKETING;

EID: 58149123575     PISSN: 15248399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1524839906289042     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Abrams, D.B., Milne, B.J., & Bulger, D. (1999). Challenges and future directions for tailored communication research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 299-306.
2. Baker, A.H., & Wardle, J. (2002). Increasing fruit and vegetable intake among adults attending colorectal cancer screening: The efficacy of a brief tailored intervention. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 11, 203-206.
3. Bartholomew, L.K., Parcel, G.S., & Kok, G. (1998). Intervention mapping: A process for developing theory- and evidence-based health education programs. Health Education & Behavior, 25, 545-563.
4. Bartholomew, L.K., Parcel, G.S., Kok, G., & Gottlieb, N.H. (2001). Intervention mapping: Designing theory- and evidence-based health promotion programs. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
5. Boslaugh, S.E., Kreuter, M.W., Nicholson, R.A., & Naleid, K. (2005). Comparing demographic, health status and psychosocial strategies of audience segmentation to promote physical activity. Health Education Research, 20, 430-438.
6. Brug, J., Campbell, M.K., & van Assema, P. (1999). The application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: A review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 36, 145-156.
7. Brug, J., Oenema, A., & Campbell, M.K. (2003). Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 77, 1028S-1034S.
8. de Vries, H., & Brug, J. (1999). Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: Introduction to a new approach. Patient Education and Counseling, 36, 99-105.
9. DiClemente, C.C., & Prochaska, J.O. (1985). Process and stages of self-change: Coping and competence in smoking behavioral change. In S. Shiffman & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Coping and substance abuse (pp. 319-343). New York: Academic Press.
10. Dijkstra, A., & de Vries, H. (1999). The development of computer-generated tailored interventions. Patient Education and Counseling, 36, 193-203.
11. Eakin, B.L., Brady, J.S., & Lusk, S.L. (2001). Creating a tailored, multimedia, computer-based intervention. Computers in Nursing, 19, 152-160.
12. Glasgow, R.E., Marcus, A.C., Bull, S.S., & Wilson, K.M. (2004). Disseminating effective cancer screening interventions. Cancer, 101, 1239-1250.
13. Institute of Medicine. (2002). New communication applications and technologies and diverse populations. In Institute of Medicine (Ed.), Speaking of health: Assessing health communication strategies for diverse populations (pp. 179-223). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
14. Kreuter, M.W., Farrell, D., Olevitch, L., & Brennan, L. (2000). Tailoring health messages: Customizing communication with computer technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Kreuter, M.W., Oswald, D.L., Bull, F.C., & Clark, E.M. (2000). Are tailored health education materials always more effective than non-tailored materials? Health Education Research, 15, 305-315.
16. Kreuter, M.W., & Skinner, C.S. (2001a). Response to Pasick (Comment). Health Education Research, 16, 507-508.
17. Kreuter, M.W. & Skinner, C.S. (2001b). Tailoring: what’s in a name? Health Education Research, 15, 1-4.
18. Kreuter, M.W., Strecher, V.J., & Glassman, B. (1999). One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materials. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 276-283.
19. Kreuter, M.W., & Wray, R.J. (2003). Tailored and targeted health communications: Strategies for enhancing information relevance. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27, S227-S232.
20. Lairson, D.R., Newmark, G.R., Rakowski, W.A., Tiro, J.A., & Vernon, S.W. (2004). Development costs of a computer-generated tailored intervention. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27, 161-169.
21. National Cancer Institute. (2003). Cancer control planet [On-line]. Retrieved July 7, 2005, from http://cancercontrolplanet.cancer.gov/index.html
22. Oenema, A., Brug, J., & Lechner, L. (2001). Web-based tailored nutritional education: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Health Education Research, 16, 647-660.
23. Oenema, A., Tan, F., & Brug, J. (2005). Short-term efficacy of a web-based computer-tailored nutrition intervention: Main effects and mediators. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 54-63.
24. Pasick, R.J. (2001). Response to Kreuter and Skinner [Letter]. Health Education Research, 16, 503-505.
25. Rakowski, W.A., Andersen, M.R., Stoddard, A.M., Urban, N., Rimer, B.K., Lane, D.S., et al. (1997). Confirmatory analysis of opinions regarding the pros and cons of mammography. Health Psychology, 16, 433-441.
26. Rakowski, W.A., Dube, C.A., & Goldstein, M.G. (1996). Considerations for extending the transtheoretical model of behavior change to screening mammography. Health Education Research, 11, 77-96.
27. Rakowski, W.A., Dube, C.A., Marcus, B.H., Prochaska, J.O., Velicer, W.F., & Abrams, D.B. (1992). Assessing elements of women’s decisions about mammography. Health Psychology, 11, 111-118.
28. Rakowski, W.A., Ehrich, B., Dube, C.A., Pearlman, D.N., Goldstein, M.G., Peterson, K.K., et al. (1996). Screening mammography and constructs from the transtheoretical model: Associations using two definitions of the stages-of-adoption. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 91-100.
29. Rakowski, W.A., Fulton, J.P., & Feldman, J.P. (1993). Women’s decision making about mammography: A replication of the relationship between stages of adoption and decisional balance. Health Psychology, 12, 209-214.
30. Revere, D., & Dunbar, P.J. (2001). Review of computer-generated outpatient health behavior interventions: Clinical encounters “in absentia.” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 8, 62-79.
31. Rimer, B.K. (2000). Response to Kreuter and Skinner [Letter]. Health Education Research, 15, 503.
32. Rimer, B.K., Conaway, M.R., Lyna, P.R., Glassman, B., Yarnall, K.S., Lipkus, I.M., et al. (1999). The impact of tailored interventions on a community health center population. Patient Education and Counseling, 37, 125-140.
33. Rimer, B.K., & Glassman, B. (1998). Tailoring communications for primary care settings. Methods of Information in Medicine, 37, 171-176.
34. Rimer, B.K., & Glassman, B. (1999). Is there a use for tailored print communications in cancer risk communication? Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 25, 140-148.
35. Rimer, B.K., Halabi, S., Skinner, C.S., Kaplan, E.B., Crawford, Y., Samsa, G.P., et al. (2001). The short-term impact of tailored mammography decision-making interventions. Patient Education and Counseling, 43, 271-287.
36. Ryan, G.L., Skinner, C.S., Farrell, D., & Champion, V.L. (2001). Examining the boundaries of tailoring: The utility of tailoring versus targeting mammography interventions for two distinct populations. Health Education Research, 16, 555-566.
37. Ryan, P., & Lauver, D.R. (2002). The efficacy of tailored interventions. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34, 331-337.
38. Skinner, C.S., Campbell, M.K., Rimer, B.K., Curry, S.J., & Prochaska, J.O. (1999). How effective is tailored print communication? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 290-298.
39. Stoddard, A.M., Rimer, B.K., Lane, D.S., Fox, S.A., Lipkus, I.M., Luckmann, R., et al. for the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. (1998). Underusers of mammogram screening: Stage of adoption in five U.S. subpopulations. Preventive Medicine, 27, 478-487.
40. Strecher, V.J. (1999). Computer-tailored smoking cessation materials: A review and discussion. Patient Education and Counseling, 36, 107-117.
41. Strecher, V.J., Kreuter, M.W., den Boer, D.-J., Kobrin, S., Hospers, H., & Skinner, C.S. (1994). The effects of computer-tailored smoking cessation materials in family practice settings. Journal of Family Practice, 39, 262-270.
42. Vernon, S.W., Lairson, D.R., del Junco, D.J., Perz, C.A., Chan, W., Rakowski, W.A., et al. (2000). Early detection of breast cancer among women veterans: A study to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of new methods to improve compliance with mammography screening guidelines. Oncology Economics, 1, 32-37.