The development of computer-generated tailored interventions

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 193-203

  Dijkstra, Arie ^a   De Vries, Hein ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computer tailoring; Effectiveness; Intervention development

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION; COMPUTER; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIAL PROBLEM; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COGNITION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; MOTIVATION; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SELF CARE; SELF CONCEPT; TEACHING;

COGNITION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; FEEDBACK; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTIVATION; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT EDUCATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CARE; SELF EFFICACY; SMOKING CESSATION;

EID: 0033083533     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00135-9     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. De Vries H., Willemsen M., Brug J., Dijkstra A., Berben J. Voorlichting op maat; een nieuwe interactieve voorlichtingsmethode [tailored education; a new interactive method of health education]. Tijdschr Gezondheidsbevord. 16:1995;59-70.
2. Strecher V.J., Kreuter M., Den Boer D.J., Kobrin S., Hospers H.J., Skinner C.S. The effect of computer-tailored smoking cessation messages in family practice settings. J Family Pract. 39:1994;262-268.
3. Velicer W.F., Prochaska J.O., Bellis J.B.et al. An expert system intervention for smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 18:1993;269-290.
4. Dijkstra A., De Vries H., Roijackers J., Van Breukelen G. Tailored interventions to communicate stage-matched information to smokers in different motivational stages. J Consult Clin Psychol. 66:1998;549-557.
5. Prochaska J.O., DiClemente C.C., Norcross J.C. In search of how people change, applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 47:1992;1102-1114.
6. Rimer B.K., Orleans C.T., Fleisher L.et al. Does tailoring matter? The impact of a tailored quide on ratings and short-term smoking-related outcomes for older smokers. Health Educ Res. 9:1994;69-84.
7. Pallonen U.E., Leskinen L., Prochaska J.O., Willey C.J., Kääriäinen R., Salonen J.T. A 2-year self-help smoking cessation manual intervention among middle-aged Finnish men: An application of the Transtheoretical model. Prev Med. 23:1994;507-514.
8. Campbell M.K., De Vellis B.M., Strecher V.J., Ammerman A.S., De Vellis R.F., Sandler R.S. Improving dietary behavior: The effectivesness of tailored messages in primary care settings. Am J Public Health. 84:1994;783-787.
9. Brug J., Glanz K., Van Assema P., Kok G., Van Breukelen G.J.P. The impact of computer-tailored feedback and iterative feedback on fat, fruit, and vegetable intake. Health Educ Behav. 25:1998;357-371.
10. Brug J., Steenhuis I., Van Assema P., De Vries H. The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. Prev Med. 25:1995;236-242.
11. Skinner C.S., Strecher V.J., Hospers H. Physicians' recommendations for mammography: Do tailored messages make a difference? Am J Public Health. 84:1994;43-49.
12. Kreuter M.W., Strecher V.J. Do tailored behavior change messages enhance the effectiveness of health risk appraisal? Results from a randomized trial. Health Educ Res. 11:1996;97-105.
13. Dijkstra A., De Vries H., Roijackers J. Computerized tailored feed-back to change cognitive determinants of smoking: A Dutch field experiment. Health Educ Res. 13:1998;197-206.
14. Dijkstra A., De Vries H., Roijackers J. Long-term effectiveness of computer-generated tailored feed-back in smoking cessation. Health Educ Res. 13:1998;207-214.
15. Dijkstra A, De Vries H, Roijackers J, Van Breukelen G. Computerized tailored feed-back to stimulate precontemplators to quit smoking: Three basic efficacy questions. Health Psychol, 1999:in press.
16. Rosenstock I. The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Educ Monogr. 2:1974;354-386.
17. Ajzen I. Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1988.
18. De Vries H., Dijkstra M., Kuhlman P. Self-efficacy: The third factor besides attitude and subjective norm as a predictor of behavior intention. Health Educ Res. 3:1988;273-282.
19. Maddux J.E., Rogers R.W. Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J Exp Soc Psychol. 19:1983;469-479.
20. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
21. Bandura A. The exercise of control. New York: Freeman, 1997.
22. Dijkstra A., Roijackers J., De Vries H. Smokers in four stages of readiness to change. Addict Behav. 23:1998;339-350.
23. Velicer W.F., DiClemente C.C., Rossi J.S., Prochaska J.O. Relapse situations and self-efficacy: An integrative model. Addict Behav. 15:1990;271-283.
24. Dijkstra A., Bakker M., De Vries H. Subtypes within a precontemplating sample of smokers: A preliminary extension of the stages of change. Addict Behav. 22:1997;327-337.
25. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing. New York: The Guilford Press, 1991.
26. Von Bertalanfy L. General system theory; foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller, 1968.
27. Powers W.T. Feedback: Beyond Behaviorism. Science. 179:1973;351-356.
28. Kazdin AE. The evaluation of psychotherapy: Research design and methodology. In: Garfield SL, Bergin AE, editors. Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: Wiley, 1986.