Tailoring communications for primary care settings

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 171-177

  Rimer, Barbara K ^a,c   Glassman, B ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer screening; New media; Primary care; Tailored print communications

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA BASE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PATIENT INFORMATION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0031866377     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634520     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Prochaska JO, Goldstein MG. Process of smoking cessation: Implications for clinicians. Clin Chest Med 1991; 12 (4): 727-35.
2. Harris L. Differences that make a difference. In: Harris L, ed. Health and The New Media. New Jersey: Erlbaum 1995.
3. Smigel K. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1994; 86(17).
4. Voelker R. Personalized messages invite more mammography [news]. J Am Med Assoc 1994; 271 (10): 733-5.
5. Vickery D. Demand management, self-care. and the new media. In: Harris L. ed. Health and The New Media. New Jersey: Erlbaum 1995; 45-65.
6. Wennberg J. Shared decision making and multimeda. In: Harris L. ed. Health and The New Media. New Jersey: Erlbaum 1995; 109-12.
7. Woolf Brian P. Customer Specific Marketing. New York: Rand McNally 1992.
8. Skinner CS, Strecher VJ, Hospers H. Physician recommendations for mammography: Do tailored messages make a difference? Am J Public Health 1994; 84(1): 43-9.
9. Prochaska JO, DiClememe CC, Velicer WF, Rossi JS. Standardized. individualized, interactive and personalized selfhelp programs for smoking cessation. Health Psychol 1993; 12 (5): 399-405.
10. Strecher VJ, Kreuier MW, DenBoer CH, Kobnn SC, Hospers HJ, Skinner CS. The effects of computer-tailored smoking cessation messages in family practice settings. J Fam Pract 1994, 39 (1): 262-70.
11. Campbell MK, DeVellis BM, Strecher VJ, Ammerrnan AS, DeVellis RF, Sandler RS. The impact of message tailoring on dietary behavior change for disease prevention in primary care settings. Am J Public Health 1994; 84 (5): 783-7.
12. Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ. Changing inaccurate perception of health risk: results from a randomized trial. Health Psychol 1995; 14 (1): 56-63.
13. Brug J, Steenhuis I, Van Assema P, De Vries H. The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. Prev Med 1996; 25: 236-42.
14. Rimer BK. Mammography use in the U.S.: Trends and the impact of interventions. Ann of Behav Med 1995; 14 (4): 317-26.
15. Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Evers KE. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. 1996; 60-84.
16. Rimer BK, Conaway MR, Lyna PR, Rakowski W, Woods-Powell CT, Tessaro I, Yarnall K, Barber LT. Cancer screening practices among women in a community health center population. Am J Prev Med 1996; 12 (5): 351-7.
17. Tessaro I, Lyna PR, Rimer BK, Heisler J, Woods-Powell CT, Yarnall KSJ, Barber LT. Readiness to change smoking behavior in a community health center population. J Comm Health, (in press).
18. Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D et al. A strong candidate for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility eene BRCAJ. Science 1994; 266: 66-71.
19. McGmnis JM, Deering MJ. Patrick. Public health information and the new media. In: Harris L. ed. Health and the New Media. New Jersey: Erlbaum 1995; 127-45.
20. Consumer Health Informatics. United States General Accounting Office. Washington. DC, July 1996.
21. Henderson J, Meditation on the new media and professional education. In. Harris L, ed. Health and the New Madia. New Jersey: Erlbaum 1995; 185-209.
22. Tuttle MS, Nelson SJ. A poor precedent. Meth Inform Med 1996; 35: 211-7.