Technical features of curriculum-based measures for beginning writers

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 41-60

  Mcmaster, Kristen L ^a   Xiaoqing Du, ^a   Pétursdéttir, Anna Lind ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

Author keywords

Curriculum based measures; Elementary age; Written language

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CHILD; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING DISORDER; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; TEACHING; WRITING;

ACHIEVEMENT; CHILD; CUES; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, SPECIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING DISORDERS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; TEACHING; WRITING;

EID: 58049141432     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022219408326212     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Berninger, V.W. (2000). Development of language by hand and its connections with language by ear, mouth, and eye. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 65-84.
2. Berninger, V.W., Abbott, R.D., Abbott, S.P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 39-56.
3. Berninger, V.W., Nielsen, K.H., Abbott, R.D., Wijsman, E., & Raskind, W. (2008). Writing problems in developmental dyslexia: Under-recognized and under-treated. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 1-21.
4. Berninger, V.W., Rutberg, J.E., Abbott, R.D., Garcia, N., Anderson-Youngstrom, M., Brooks, A., et al. (2006). Tier 1 and Tier 2 early intervention for handwriting and composing. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 3-30.
5. Berninger, V.W., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R.D., Begay, K., Coleman, K.B., Curtain, G., et al. (2002). Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 291-304.
6. Berninger, V., Yates, C., Cartwright, A., Rutberg, J., Remy, E., & Abbott, R. (1992). Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 257-280.
7. Brigance, A.H. (1999). Comprehensive inventory of basic skills-Revised. North Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates. Cooper, D., & Pikulski, J. (2005). Here we go! Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
8. Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
9. Deno, S., Marston, D., Mirkin, P., Lowry, L., Sindelar, P., & Jenkins, J. (1982). The use of standard tasks to measure achievement in reading, spelling, and written expression: A normative and developmental study (Report No. IRLD-RR-87). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
10. Deno, S.L., Mirkin, P., & Marston, D. (1980). Relationships among simple measures of written expression and performance on standardized achievement tests (Report No. IRLD-RR-22). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
11. Deno, S.L., Mirkin, P., & Marston, D. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children Special Education and Pediatrics: A New Relationship, 48, 368-371.
12. Espin, C.A., De La Paz, S., Scierka, B.J., & Roelofs, L. (2005). The relationship between curriculum-based measures in written expression and quality and completeness of expository writing for middle school students. Journal of Special Education, 38, 208-217.
13. Espin, C.A., Scierka, B.J., Skare, S., & Halverson, N. (1999). Criterion-related validity of curriculum-based measures in writing for secondary school students. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 15, 5-27.
14. Espin, C., Shin, J., Deno, S.L., Skare, S., Robinson, S., & Benner, B. (2000). Identifying indicators of written expression proficiency for middle school students. Journal of Special Education, 34, 140-153.
15. Foegen, A., Jiban, C., & Deno, S. (2007). Progress monitoring measures in mathematics: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education, 41, 121-139.
16. Gansle, K.A., Noell, G.H., VanDerHeyden, A.M., Naquin, G.M., & Slider, N.J. (2002). Moving beyond total words written: The reliability, criterion validity, and time cost of alternative measures for curriculum-based measurement in writing. School Psychology Review, 31, 477-497.
17. Gansle, K.A., Noell, G.H., VanDerHeyden, A.M., Slider, N.J., Hoffpauir, L.D., & Whitmarsh, E.L., et al. (2004). An examination of the criterion validity and sensitivity to brief intervention of alternate curriculum-based measures of writing skill. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 291-300.
18. Good, R.H., III, & Kaminski, R.A. (1996). Assessment for instructional decisions: Toward a proactive/prevention model of decision-making for early literacy skills. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 326-336.
19. Graham, S., Berninger, V.W., Abbott, R.D., Abbott, S.P., & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 170-182.
20. Graham, S., Berninger, V., Weintraub, N., & Schafer, W. (1998). Development of handwriting speed and legibility in grades 1-9. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 42-52.
21. Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (2005). Improving the writing performance of young struggling writers: Theoretical and programmatic research from the center on accelerating student learning. Journal of Special Education, 39, 19-33.
22. Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Chorzempa, B.F. (2002). Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 669-686.
23. Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Fink, B. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 620-633.
24. Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Larsen, L. (2001). Prevention and intervention of writing difficulties for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 16, 74-84.
25. Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99 (3). 445-476.
26. Hammill, D.D., & Hresko, W.P. (1994). Comprehensive scales of student abilities. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
27. Hammill, D.D., & Larsen, S.C. (1996). Test of written language- Third edition. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
28. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
29. Jewell, J., & Malecki, C.K. (2005). The utility of CBM written language indices: An investigation of production-dependent, production- independent, and accurate-production scores. School Psychology Review, 34, 27-44.
30. Jones, D., & Christensen, C.A. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students' ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44-49.
31. Lembke, E., Deno, S., & Hall, K. (2003). Identifying an indicator of growth in early writing proficiency for elementary school students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28, 23-35.
32. Malecki, C.K., & Jewell, J. (2003). Developmental, gender, and practical considerations in scoring Curriculum-Based Measurement writing probes. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 379-390.
33. Marston, D. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford.
34. Marston, D., & Deno, S. (1981). The reliability of simple, direct measures of written expression (Report No. IRLD-RR-50). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
35. Marston, D., Deno, S.L., & Tindal, G. (1983). A comparison of standardized achievement tests and direct measurement techniques in measuring pupil progress (Report No. IRLD-RR-126). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
36. McMaster, K.L., & Campbell, H. (in press). Technical features of new and existing measures of written expression: An examination within and across grade levels. School Psychology Review.
37. McMaster, K.L., & Espin, C.A. (2007). Technical features of curriculum-based measurement in writing: A literature review. Journal of Special Education, 41, 68-84.
38. National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Nation's report card: Writing. Retrieved April 23, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/ writing/
39. National Commission on Writing. (2003). The neglected "R": The need for a writing revolution. Retrieved March 16, 2007, from http://www.writingcommission.org/
40. No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. (2002).
41. Parker, R.I., Tindal, G., & Hasbrouck, J. (1991). Countable indices of writing quality: Their suitability for screening-eligibility decisions. Exceptionality, 2, 1-17.
42. Reid, K., Hresko, W., & Hammill, D. (2001). The test of early reading ability (3 rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
43. Ritchey, K.D. (2006). Learning to write: Progress-monitoring tools for beginning and at-risk writers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39, 22-27.
44. Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. (2001). Assessment in special and remedial education (8 th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
45. Taylor, R.L. (2003). Assessment of exceptional students: Educational and psychological procedures (6 th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
46. Tindal, G., Marston, D., & Deno, S.L. (1983). The reliability of direct and repeated measurement (Report No. IRLD-RR-109). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
47. Tindal, G., & Parker, R. (1991). Identifying measures for evaluating written expression. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 211-218.
48. VanDerHeyden, A.M., Witt, J.C., Naquin, G., & Noell, G. (2001). The reliability and validity of curriculum-based measurement readiness probes for kindergarten students. School Psychology Review, 30, 363-382.
49. Videen, J., Deno, S.L., & Marston, D. (1982). Correct word sequences: A valid indicator of proficiency in written expression (Report No. IRLD-RR-84). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
50. Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
51. Wallace, T., Espin, C.A., McMaster, K., Deno, S.L., & Foegen, A. (2007). CBM progress monitoring within a standards-based system: Introduction to the special series. Journal of Special Education, 41, 66-67.
52. Wayman, M.M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H.I., Ticha, R., & Espin, C.A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. Journal of Special Education, 41, 85-120.
53. Woodcock, R. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery test-revised/ normative update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.