Moving beyond total words written: The reliability, criterion validity, and time cost of alternate measures for curriculum-based measurement in writing

School Psychology Review

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 477-497

  Gansle, Kristin A ^a   Noell, George H ^a   VanDerHeyden, Amanda M ^a   Naquin, Gale M ^b   Slider, Natalie J ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036992474     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Afifi, A. A., & Clark, V. (1990). Computer-aided multivariate analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
2. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (1987). Applied behavior analysis. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
3. Deno, S. L., Marston, D., & Mirkin, P. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 48, 368-371.
4. Espin, C. A., Scierka, B. J., Skare, S., & Halverson, N. (1999). Criterion-related validity of curriculum-based measures in writing for secondary school students. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 15, 5-27.
5. Espin, C., Shin, J., Deno, S. L., Skare, S., Robinson, S., & Benner, B. (2000). Identifying indicators of written expression proficiency for middle school students. Journal of Special Education, 34, 140-153.
6. Fry, E. B. (1989). Reading formulas-Maligned but valid. Journal of Reading, 32, 292-297.
7. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 20-28.
8. Hoover, H. D., Hieronymus, A. N., Frisbie, D. A., & Dunbar, S. B. (1996). Iowa Tests of Basic Skills, Form M. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
9. Howell, J. F., & Memering, D. (1986). Brief handbook for writers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10. Howell, K. W., Fox, S. L., & Morehead, M. K. (1993). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
11. Jenkins, J. R., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1979). Measuring pupil progress toward the least restrictive environment. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 81-92.
12. Kazdin, A. E. (1997). Research design in clinical psychology (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 38-78). New York: Guilford Press.
14. Mitzel, H. C., & Borden, C. F. (2000). LEAP for the 21st century: 1999 operational final technical report. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.
15. Noell, G. H., & Gresham, F. M. (1993). Functional outcome analysis: Do the benefits of consultation and prereferral intervention justify the costs? School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 200-226.
16. Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
17. Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
18. Tindal, G., & Parker, R. (1989). Assessment of written expression for students in compensatory and special education programs. Journal of Special Education, 23, 169-183.
19. Watkinson, J. T., & Lee, S. W. (1992). Curriculum-based measures of written expression for learning-disabled and nondisabled students. Psychology in the Schools, 29, 184-191.