Prediction of seismic-induced structural damage using artificial neural networks

Engineering Structures

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 600-606

  de Lautour, Oliver Richard ^a   Omenzetter, Piotr ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Damage prediction; Seismic damage; Structural vulnerability

Indexed keywords

BACKPROPAGATION; BUILDING MATERIALS; CONCRETE BEAMS AND GIRDERS; CONCRETES; DAMAGE DETECTION; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; EARTHQUAKES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FORECASTING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMOLOGY; STEEL STRUCTURES;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS; DAMAGE ESTIMATIONS; DAMAGE INDICES; DAMAGE PREDICTION; DAMAGE PROGNOSIS; DYNAMIC STRUCTURAL RESPONSES; FEM ANALYSES; GENERAL METHODS; GROUND MOTIONS; NONLINEAR FINITE ELEMENT METHODS; NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS; SEISMIC DAMAGE; SEISMIC EXCITATIONS; SEISMIC VULNERABILITY CURVES; SHORT-COMINGS; STRUCTURAL DAMAGES; STRUCTURAL VULNERABILITY;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; DAMAGE MECHANICS; DAMPING; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GROUND MOTION; REINFORCED CONCRETE; STIFFNESS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 57849094451     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ramos L.F., and Lourenco P.B. Modeling and vulnerability of historical city centers in seismic areas: A case study in Lisbon. Eng Struct 26 (2004) 1295-1310
2. Elnashai A.S. Analysis of the damage potential of the Kocaeli (Turkey) earthquake of 17 August 1999. Eng Struct 22 (2000) 746-754
3. Magliulo G., Fabbrocino G., and Manfredi G. Seismic assessment of existing precast industrial buildings using static and dynamic nonlinear analyses. Eng Struct 30 (2008) 2580-2588
4. Chi W.-M., El-Tawil S., Deierlein G.G., and Abel J.F. Inelastic analyses of a 17-story steel framed building damaged during Northridge. Eng Struct 20 (1998) 481-495
5. Jeong S.-H., and Elnashai A.S. Probabilistic fragility analysis parameterized by fundamental response quantities. Eng Struct 29 (2007) 1238-1251
6. Kwon O.-S., and Elnashai A. The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure. Eng Struct 28 (2006) 289-303
7. Benedetti D., Benzoni G., and Parisi M.A. Seismic vulnerability and risk evaluation for old urban nuclei. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 16 (1988) 183-201
8. Hassan A.F., and Sozen M.A. Seismic vulnerability assessment of low-rise buildings in regions with infrequent earthquakes. ACI Struct J 94 (1997) 31-39
9. Dowrick D.J., Rhoades D.A., and Davenport P.N. Damage ratios for domestic property in the magnitude 7.2 1968 Inangahua, New Zealand, earthquake. Bull New Zealand Soc Earthq Eng 34 (2001) 191-213
10. Rossetto T., and Elnashai A. Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Eng Struct 25 (2003) 1241-1263
11. Lagomarsino S., and Podestá S. Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches: II. Statistical analysis of surveyed data and methods for risk analysis. Earthq Spectra 20 (2004) 395-412
12. Dolce M., Kappos A., Masi A., Penelis G., and Vona M. Vulnerability assessment and earthquake damage scenarios of the building stock of Potenza (southern Italy) using Italian and Greek methodologies. Eng Struct 28 (2006) 357-371
13. Li Q., and Ellingwood B.R. Damage inspection and vulnerability analysis of existing buildings with steel moment-resisting frames. Eng Struct 30 (2008) 338-351
14. D'Ayala D., Spence R., Oliveira C., and Pomonis A. Earthquake loss estimation for Europe's historic town centres. Earthq Spectra 13 (1997) 773-792
15. Calvi G.M. A displacement-based approach for vulnerability evaluation of classes of buildings. J Earthq Eng 3 (1999) 411-438
16. Dymiotis C., Kappos A.J., and Chryssanthopoulos M.K. Seismic reliability of RC frames with uncertain drift and member capacity. J Struct Eng 125 (1999) 1038-1047
17. Dymiotis C., Kappos A.J., and Chryssanthopoulos M.K. Seismic reliability of masonry-infilled RC frames. J Struct Eng 127 (2001) 296-305
18. Porter K.A., Kiremidjian A.S., and LeGure J.S. Assembly-based vulnerability of building and its use in performance evaluation. Earthq Spectra 17 (2001) 291-312
19. Lang K., and Bachmann H. On the seismic vulnerability of existing buildings: A case study of the city of Basel. Earthq Spectra 20 (2004) 43-66
20. Choi E., DesRoches R., and Nielson B. Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones. Eng Struct 26 (2004) 187-199
21. Rossetto T., and Elnashai A. A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacement-based vulnerability curves for populations of RC structures. Eng Struct 27 (2005) 397-409
22. Borzi B., Pinho R., and Crowley H. Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis for large-scale assessment of RC buildings. Eng Struct 30 (2008) 804-820
23. Erberik M.A. Fragility-based assessment of typical mid-rise and low-rise RC buildings in Turkey. Eng Struct 30 (2008) 1360-1374
24. Serdar Kircil M., and Polat Z. Fragility analysis of mid-rise R/C frame buildings. Eng Struct 28 (2006) 1335-1345
25. Elenas A., and Meskouris K. Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of structures. Eng Struct 23 (2001) 698-704
26. Riddell R. On ground motion intensity indices. Earthq Spectra 23 (2007) 147-173
27. Yücemen M.S., Özcebe G., and Pay A.C. Prediction of potential damage due to severe earthquakes. Struct Safety 26 (2004) 349-366
28. Yakut A., Özcebe G., and Yücemen M.S. Seismic vulnerability assessment using regional empirical data. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 35 (2006) 1187-1202
29. Adeli H. Neural networks in civil engineering: 1989-2000. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 16 (2001) 126-142
30. Wu X., Ghaboussi J., and Garrett J.H. Use of neural networks in detection of structural damage. Comput Struct 42 (1992) 649-659
31. Nakamura M., Masri S.F., Chassiakos A.G., and Caughey A.K. A method for non-parametric damage detection through the use of neural networks. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 27 (1998) 997-1010
32. Zang C., and Imregun M. Structural damage detection using artificial neural networks and measured FRF data reduced via principal component projection. J Sound Vibr 242 (2001) 813-827
33. Molas G.L., and Yamazaki F. Neural networks for quick earthquake damage estimation. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 24 (1995) 505-516
34. De Stefano A., Sabia D., and Sabia L. Probabilistic neural networks for seismic damage mechanisms prediction. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 28 (1999) 807-821
35. Aoki T., Ceravolo R., De Stefano A., Genovese C., and Sabia D. Seismic vulnerability assessment of chemical plants through probabilistic neural networks. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 77 (2002) 263-268
36. Erkus B. Utilization of artificial neural networks in building damage prediction. Ankara (Turkey): Middle East Technical University; 1999
37. Sánchez-Silva M., and García L. Earthquake damage assessment based on fuzzy logic and neutral networks. Earthq Spectra 17 (2001) 89-112
38. In: Anderson J.A., and Rosenfeld E. (Eds). Neurocomputing: Foundations of research (1988), MIT Press, Cambridge (MA)
39. Rumelhart D.E., Hinton G.E., and Williams R.J. Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart D.E., and McClelland J.L. (Eds). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructures of cognition (1986), MIT Press, Cambridge (MA) 318-362
40. Hagan M.T., Demuth H.B., and Beale M.H. Neural network design (1996), PWS Pub., Boston (MA)
41. Marquardt D. An algorithm for least squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 11 (1963) 431-441
42. Howard D., Beale M., and Hagan M. Neural network toolbox: User's guide version 4 (2005), Mathworks, Natick (MA)
43. Demuth H.B., Beale M.H., and Hagan M.T. Neural network toolbox 5: User's guide (2006), Mathworks, Natick (MA)
44. Standards New Zealand. NZS 3101:1995 concrete structures standard. Wellington: Standards New Zealand; 1995
45. Chopra A.K. Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 2nd ed. (2001), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (NJ)
46. Katayama T, Sato N, Saito K. SI-sensor for the identification of destructive earthquake ground motion. In: The 9th world conference on earthquake engineering, 1988. p. 667-72
47. Trifunac M.D., and Brady A.G. A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 68 (1975) 1487-1520
48. Carr AJ. Ruaumoko-Program for inelastic dynamic analysis. Christchurch: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury; 1998
49. Otani S. Sake, a computer program for inelastic response of R/C frames to earthquakes. UILU-Eng-74-2029: University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; 1974
50. Park Y.J., and Ang A.H. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. J Struct Eng, ASCE 111 (1985) 722-739
51. Stone WC, Taylor AW. Seismic performance of circular bridge columns designed in accordance with AASHTO/CALTRANS standards. Gaithersburg (MD). 1993