Fragility-based assessment of typical mid-rise and low-rise RC buildings in Turkey

Engineering Structures

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1360-1374

  Erberik, M Altuǧ ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Damage estimation; Fragility curve; Probabilistic limit states; Reinforced concrete buildings; Sampling techniques; Structural variability

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; PROBABILITY; REINFORCED CONCRETE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAMPLING; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

FRAGILITY CURVE; REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS; STRUCTURAL VARIABILITY;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

BUILDINGS; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; PROBABILITY; REINFORCED CONCRETE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAMPLING; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; BUILDING; DATABASE; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; ESTIMATION METHOD; LIMIT ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BALIKESIR [TURKEY]; EURASIA; MARMARA; TURKEY;

EID: 41549090834     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.016     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bogazici University Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Center. Earthquake risk assessment for Istanbul metropolitan area. Final report. May 2002
2. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (IBB). The study on a disaster prevention/mitigation basic plan in istanbul including seismic microzonation in the Republic of Turkey. Final report. December 2002
3. Akkar S., Sucuoǧlu H., and Yakut A. Displacement-based fragility functions for low and mid-rise ordinary concrete buildings. Earthquake Spectra 21 4 (2005) 901-927
4. Kirçil M.S., and Polat Z. Fragility analysis of mid-rise R/C frame buildings. Engineering Structures 28 9 (2006) 1335-1345
5. Ozcebe G, Yucemen MS, Yakut A, Aydoǧan V. Seismic vulnerability assessment procedure for low- to medium-rise reinforced concrete buildings. Structural Engineering Research Unit (SERU) report no: 03/02. TUBITAK-METU. Ankara. 2003
6. Aydoǧan V. Seismic vulnerability assessment of existing RC buildings in Turkey. Master thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University Ankara; 2003
7. Dimova S.L., and Negro P. Assessment of seismic fragility of structures with consideration of the quality of construction. Earthquake Spectra 22 4 (2006) 909-936
8. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 356). 2000
9. Computers and Structures, Inc. SAP2000 nonlinear, structural analysis program. Berkeley (CA). 2000
10. Mosalam K.M., Ayala G., White R.N., and Roth C. Seismic fragility of LRC frames with and without masonry infill walls. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1 4 (1997) 693-720
11. Erberik M.A., and Elnashai A.S. Fragility analysis of flat-slab structures. Engineering Structures 26 7 (2004) 937-948
12. Kwon O.S., and Elnashai A. The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure. Engineering Structures 28 2 (2006) 289-303
13. Cosmos Virtual Data Center. Consortium of organizations for strong motion observation systems. http://db.cosmos-eq.org [Last accessed June 2007]
14. Sucuoǧlu H, Erberik MA. Influence of ground motion intensity parameters on elastic response spectra. In: 11th European conference on earthquake engineering. 1998
15. Akkar S., and Ozen O. Effect of peak ground velocity on deformation demands for SDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 34 (2005) 1551-1571
16. Erberik MA, Elnashai AS. Seismic vulnerability of flat-slab structures. Mid-America Earthquake (MAE) Center. Report no. 03-06, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2003
17. Jeong S.H., and Elnashai A.S. Probabilistic fragility analysis parameterized by fundamental response quantities. Engineering Structures 29 6 (2007) 1238-1251
18. DiPasquale E, Cakmak AS. Detection and assessment of seismic structural damage. Technical report NCEER-87-0015. Buffalo (NY). State University of New York; 1987
19. Reinhorn A.M., Kunnath S.K., and Mander J.B. Seismic design of structures for damage control. In: Fajfar P., and Krawinkler H. (Eds). Nonlinear seismic analysis and design of reinforced concrete buildings (1992), Elsevier 63-76
20. Park Y.J., Ang A.H.S., and Wen Y.K. Seismic damage analysis of RC buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 111 4 (1995) 740-757
21. Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC). Performance based seismic engineering of buildings. Sacramento (CA): Vision 2000 Committee. 1995
22. Ghobarah A. On drift limits associated with different damage levels. In: Proceedings of the international workshop Bled, Slovenia. PEER report no. 04/05: 321-332. 2004
23. Booth E, Spence R, Bird J. Building vulnerability assessment using pushover methods - A Turkish case study. In: Proceedings of an international workshop on performance-based seismic design concepts and implementation, Bled Slovenia. PEER report no. 04/05: 397-408. 2004
24. Benjamin J.R., and Cornell C.A. Probability, statistics and decision for civil engineers (1970), McGraw Hill
25. Clough RW, Johnston SB. Effect of stiffness degradation on earthquake ductility requirements. In: Proceedings, second Japan national conference on earthquake engineering. 1996. p. 227-32
26. Moreno R, Pujades LG, Barbat AH, Aparicio AC. Influence of masonry infill walls on the seismic behavior of multi-story waffle slab RC buildings, In: Proceedings of 13th world conference on earthquake engineering. 2004. Paper no. 209
27. McKay M.D., Conover W.J., and Beckman R.J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 221 (1979) 239-245
28. Iman R.L., and Conover W.J. A distribution free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Communications in Statistics 11 3 (1982) 311-334
29. Erberik M.A., and Sucuoǧlu H. Seismic energy dissipation in deteriorating systems through low-cycle fatigue. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 33 (2004) 49-67
30. Sucuoǧlu H., and Erberik M.A. Energy based hysteresis and damage models for deteriorating systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 33 (2004) 69-88
31. Sucuoǧlu H, Erberik MA. Evaluation of inelastic displacements in deteriorating systems using an energy-based approach. In: Proceedings of the international workshop Bled, Slovenia, PEER report no. 04/05: 421-433. 2004
32. Wight JK, Sözen MA. Shear strength decay in reinforced concrete columns subjected to large deflection reversals. Structural Research Series No. 403, Civil Engineering Studies. Urbana-Champaign (IL): University of Illinois; 1973
33. Saatçioǧlu M., and Özcebe G. Response of reinforced concrete columns to simulated seismic loading. ACI Structural Journal (1989) 3-12
34. Pujol S. Drift capacity of reinforced concrete columns subjected to displacement reversals. Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University; 2002
35. Earthquake Engineering and Research Center. Marmara and Düzce earthquakes engineering report. Ankara (Turkey): Middle East Technical University, Civil Engineering Department; 2000
36. Campbell K.W. Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of PGA, PGV and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra. Seismological Research Letters 68 1 (1997) 154-179
37. Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y. Near-source attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration from worlwide accelerograms recorded from 1957 to 1993, In: Proceedings of the 5th US national conference on earthquake engineering. 1994. pp. 283-92
38. Lettis W., Bachhuber J., Barka A., Brankman C., Somerville P., and Witter R. Geology and seismicity (1999 Kocaeli Turkey Earthquake Reconnaissance Report). Earthquake Spectra 16 suppl. A (2000) 1-9 [chapter 1]
39. Ang A.H.S., and Tang W.H. Probability concepts in engineering planning and design: Basic principles vol. 1 (1975), John Wiley & Sons