Teacher educators’ teaching methods, assessments, and grading: A comparison of higher education faculty's instructional practices

Teacher Educator

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-16

  Goubeaud, Karleen ^a   Yan, Wenfan ^b  

^a LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57849083177     PISSN: 08878730     EISSN: 19388101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08878730409555348     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. American Association of State Colleges and Universities, & Teacher Education Council of State Colleges and Universities. 1995. Changing course:Teacher education reform at state colleges and universities, Washington, DC:American Association of State Colleges and Universities.
2. American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & National Education Association. 1990. Standards far teacher competence in educational assessment of students, Washington, DC:Authors.
3. Bandura, A., 1977. Social learning theory, Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
4. Barnes, L. L. B., Agago, M. O., and Coombs, W. T., 1998. Effects of job‐related stress on faculty intention to leave academia. Research in Higher Education, 39:457–469.
5. Bellas, M. L., and Toutkoushian, R. K., 1999. Faculty time allocations and research productivity:Gender, race and family effects. The Review of Higher Education, 22:367–390.
6. Benjamin, E., 1998. Declining faculty availability to students is the problem‐ But tenure is not the explanation. American Behavioral Scientist, 41:716–735.
7. Bess, J. L., 1998. Contract systems, bureaucracies, and faculty motivation:The probable effects of a no‐tenure policy. Journal of Higher Education, 69:1–22.
8. Biggs, J., 1996. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32:347–364.
9. Brookhart, S. M., 1999. The art and science of classroom assessment:The missing part of pedagogy, Washington, DC:George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Institute for Education Policy Studies. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED432938)
10. 1986. “ Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy ”. In A nation prepared:Teachers for the 21” century, New York:Carnegie Corporation.
11. Chappuis, S., and Stiggins, R. J., 2002. Classroom assessment for learning. Educational Leadership, 60:40–43.
12. Darling‐Hammond, L., 1989. Accountability for professional practice. Teachers College Record, 91:59–80.
13. Darling‐Hammond, L., 1997. The right to learn and the advancement of teaching:Research, policy, and practice for democratic education. Educational Researcher, 25:5–17.
14. Darling‐Hammond, L., and McLaughlin, M. W., 1995. Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76:597–604.
15. Earl, L. M., 2003. “ Assessment as learning:Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning ”. In Experts in assessment series:Move your students to a higher level, Edited by:Guskey, T. R., and Marzano, R. J., Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
16. Engeldinger, E. A., and Love, M. G., 1998. Taking instruction to where it will be used:Tutoring faculty in their offices. Cause/Effect, 21:54–58.
17. Farmer, D. W., 1999. Institutional improvement and motivated faculty:A case study. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 78:87–95.
18. Faseyitan, S., Libii, J. N., and Hirschbuhl, J., 1996. An inservice model for enhancing faculty computer self‐efficacy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 27:214–226.
19. Finn, C. E., Jr., ed. 2002. Five Year Report 1997–2001, Washington, DC:Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
20. Goodlad, J., 1994. Educational renewal:Better teachers, better schools, San Francisco:Jossey‐Bass.
21. Goodlad, J. I., 1999. Whither schools ofeducation?. Journal of Teacher Education, 50:325–338.
22. Gronlund, N. E., 2003. Assessment of student achievement, Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
23. Haeger, J. D., 1998. Part‐time faculty, quality programs, and economic realities. New Directions for Higher Education, 104:81–88.
24. Henke, R. R., Chen, X., and Goldman, G., 1999. What happens in classrooms? Instructional practices in elementary and secondary schools, 1994–95, Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (NCES Publication No. 1999348)
25. Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P. R., and Winters, L., 1992. A practical guide to alternative assessment, Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision andCurriculum Development.
26. Holmes Group. 1986. Tomorrow's teachers, East Lansing, MI:Author.
27. Holmes Group. 1990. Tomorrows schools:Principles for the design of professional development schools, East Lansing, MI:Author.
28. Holmes Group. 1995. Tomorrow's schools of education, East Lansing, MI:Audior.
29. Lieberman, A., 1995. Practices that support teacher development Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76:591–596.
30. Light, G., and Cox, P., 2001. Learning & teaching in higher education:The reflective professional, London, England:Paul Chapman.
31. National ommission of Excellence in Education. 1983. A nation at risk:The imperative for educational reform, Washington, DC:U.S. Government Printing Office.
32. Pierce, J. W., and Kalkman, D. L., 2003. Applying learner‐centered principles in teacher education. Theory into Practice, 42:127–131.
33. Popham, J., 2003. The seductive allure of data. Educational Leadership, 60:48–51.
34. Resnick, L. B., ed. 1989. Knowing, learning and instruction:Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Selfa, L. A., Suter, N., Myers, S., Koch, S., Johnson, R. A., Zahs, D. A., Kuhr, B. D., and Abraham, S. Y., 1997. User's manual public‐use faculty and institution data [1993 national study of postsecondary faculty (NSOPF‐93)], Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (NCES Publication No. 98287)
36. Serow, R. C., Brawner, C. E., and Demery, J., 1999. Instructional reform atN research universities:Studying faculty motivation. The Review of Higher Education, 22:411–423.
37. Shapson, S. M., and Smith, N., 1999. Transformative teaching:An agenda for faculties of education. Education Canada, 39:4–6.
38. Shepard, L. A., 2000. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29:4–14.
39. Steffe, L., and Gale, J., eds. 1995. Constructivism in education, Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
40. Stiggins, R. J., 2002. Assessment crisis:The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83:758–765.
41. U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Deputy Secretary. 2004. No child left behind:A toolkit for teachers, Jessup, MD:Education Publications Center.
42. Valli, L., and Rennert‐Ariev, P. L., 2000. Identifying consensus in teacher education reform documents:A proposed framework and action implications. Journal of Teacher Education, 51:5–17.
43. Wiggins, G., 1998. Educative assessment:Designing assessments to inform and improve students’ performance, San Francisco, CA:Jossey‐Bass.
44. Wiske, M. S., ed. 1998. Teaching for understanding, San Francisco, CA:Jossey‐Bass.
45. Wolverton, M., 1998. Treading the tenure‐track tightrope:Finding balance between research excellence and quality teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 23:61–79.
46. Yager, R. E., 1991. The constructivist learning model:Towards real reform in science education. The Science Teacher, 58:52–57.